What children say and clinicians hear: accounts relating to incisor hypomineralisation of cosmetic concern.

AIM: To explore the range of impacts relating to incisor opacities as described by children, their general dental practitioners and paediatric dentists. METHODS: Participants included 50 children, aged 7-16 years, referred to a UK hospital paediatric dentistry service for management of incisor opacities. All children were subsequently diagnosed with molar incisor hypomineralisation. Following ethical approval, data were recorded as follows: patient demographics, distance travelled, waiting times, nature of any impacts relating to incisor opacities documented in referral letters and/or in subsequent paediatric dentistry assessment records. Additionally, children completed the short form Child Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire (COHIP-SF19) as a self-report measure of their oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). RESULTS: Nearly, half (48%, n = 24) of the referral letters mentioned that the child was experiencing one or more negative social and/or functional impacts. Mean COHIP score was significantly lower (indicating poorer OHRQoL) for children whose referring dentist had identified a negative impact (COHIP = 42.9) compared to those with no documented impact (COHIP = 50.5; p = 0.018, independent t test). At the hospital consultation, negative impacts were elicited by a paediatric dentist in 86% (n = 43) of cases. Again, mean COHIP score was significantly lower for children whose assessment records noted a negative impact (COHIP = 44.5) compared to those with no recorded impact (COHIP = 60.2; p = 0.001). Families travelled a mean distance of 57 km (range 3-218 km) to the hospital service, with an average waiting time of 75 days from referral. CONCLUSION: It is encouraging that dental professionals seem to be aware of the negative psychosocial impacts experienced by some children with enamel opacities, and that children feel able to describe them.

Effects of environmental tobacco smoke on the oral health of preschool children.

AIMS: This study investigated the association between the prevalence of oral health problems (caries, gingivitis, mucosal pigmentation and enamel defects in one to 5 year-old children exposed and not exposed to environmental tobacco smoke before and/or after birth. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) in childhood may have significant health effects. METHODS: A structured questionnaire was used to collect data on a child's current and previous illnesses, oral health behaviours, dietary habits, parental smoking behaviours and parents' dental history. The intraoral examination recorded dental caries (dmfs), enamel defects, gingival health, melanin pigmentation and soft tissue health. Stimulated saliva was collected. Total sIgA levels were quantified using indirect competitive ELISA with a SalimetricsTM kit. RESULTS: The 44 children (aged 15-69 months) recruited were divided into two groups: ETS and non-ETS (control). There were 22 children in each: 16 who were exposed to ETS during and after gestation were identified as the ETSB subgroup. Participants exposed to ETS were more likely to have had upper respiratory tract and middle ear infections during the neonatal period and had higher mean dmft, mean dmfs, mean percent of surfaces with demarcated opacities and mean GI than the non-ETS participants. The children exposed to ETS before and after birth had the highest occurrence of enamel opacities showed a higher risk for dental caries even though more children in this group used the recommended fluoride toothpaste (1000 ppm fluoride). Mothers who smoked either never breastfed their children or breastfed their children for less than the recommended period of 6 months. Children exposed to ETS were shown to have higher mean total sIgA (µg/ml) than the children in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Associations between ETS exposure before and after gestation and oral health, including salivary changes in young children were shown in the present study. Dental health professionals should include a question about household smoking in children's dental histories, which would allow opportunities to discuss the impact of smoking on child oral health. Longitudinal oral health studies should include a history of maternal smoking during pregnancy and afterwards.