Burden of grade 3 or 4 liver injury associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Background & Aims: There is concern about the burden of liver injury in patients with cancer exposed to immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the likelihood of grade 3/4 liver injury, of grade 3/4 cholestatic liver injury, and of liver failure, as per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5, following treatment with ICIs. We compared these occurrences with a group of cancer patients who were propensity-matched and treated with conventional chemotherapy. For all ICI patients experiencing grade 3/4 liver injury, we conducted a causality assessment using the RUCAM method and examined patient outcomes. Results: Among 952 patients (median [IQR] age 66 [57-73] years, 64% males) who were treated with ICI between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, a total of 86 (9%) progressed to grade 3/4 liver injury, and liver failure was not observed. Anti-PD-(L)1/anti-CTLA-4 antibodies combinations (adjusted hazard ratio 3.36 [95% CI: 1.67-6.79]; p <0.001), and chronic hepatitis B (adjusted hazard ratio 5.48 [95% CI: 1.62-18.5]; p = 0.006], were independent risk factors. Liver injury was attributed to ICI treatment in 19 (2.0%) patients. Patients with ICI toxicity typically presented with granulomatous hepatitis or cholangiocyte inflammation. ICI withdrawal was associated with cancer progression and mortality. Re-introduction of ICI was not associated with recurrent grade 3/4 liver injury. Compared with matched patients treated with conventional, non-ICI-based chemotherapy, anti-PD-(L)1/anti-CTLA-4 combinations (p <0.001) and anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapies (p = 0.053) increased the risk of grade 3/4 liver injury and of grade 3/4 cholestatic liver injury, respectively. Conclusions: An increased risk of grade 3/4 liver injury under anti-PD-(L)1/anti-CTLA-4 antibodies was observed, whereas no substantial increase in the likelihood of liver failure occurred even after treatment reintroduction. Impact and implications: There is concern about liver injury in patients with cancer exposed to immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs). We investigated the burden of grade 3/4 liver injury after treatment with ICIs in a multicentric cohort of patients with cancer. Overall, a 9% incidence of grade 3/4 liver injury was detected after ICIs, and direct ICI hepatotoxicity was demonstrated in 2% of patients. Anti-PD-(L)1/Anti-CTLA-4 antibody combinations, and chronic HBV infection were independent risk factors. ICI withdrawal for grade 3/4 liver injury was associated with cancer progression. Re-introduction of ICI treatment was not associated with recurrent grade 3/4 liver injury.

FOLFIRI in advanced platinum-resistant/refractory small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 15% of lung cancer and is associated with poor prognosis. In platinum-refractory or -resistant SCLC patients, few treatment options are available. Topotecan is one of the standards of care for these patients, however, due to its high toxicity, several different approaches are employed. FOLFIRI (folinate, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan) is a chemotherapy regimen used in digestive neuroendocrine carcinoma, which shares pathological similarities with SCLC. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI in patients with platinum-resistant/refractory SCLC. METHODS: Medical records from all consecutive SCLC patients treated with FOLFIRI in a French University Hospital from 2013 to 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate according to RECIST v1.1 or EORTC criteria (ORR); secondary endpoints included duration of response, disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety profile. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with metastatic platinum-resistant (n = 14) or -refractory (n = 20) SCLC were included. Twenty-eight were evaluable for response, with a partial response observed in 5 patients for an overall ORR in the evaluable population of 17.9% (5/28) and 14.7% (5/34) in the overall population. The disease control rate was 50% (14/28) in the evaluable population. The median PFS and OS were 2.8 months (95%CI, 2.0-5.2 months) and 5.3 months (95%CI, 3.5-8.9 months), respectively. All patients were included in the safety analysis. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 13 (38.2%) patients. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were asthenia, neutropenia, thrombopenia and diarrhea. There was no adverse event leading to discontinuation or death. CONCLUSION: FOLFIRI showed some activity for platinum-resistant/refractory SCLC in terms of overall response and had an acceptable safety profile. However, caution is needed in interpreting this result. FOLFIRI could represent a potential new treatment for platinum-resistant/refractory SCLC patients. Further prospective studies are needed to assess the benefits of this chemotherapy regimen.HIGHLIGHTSFOLFIRI showed some activity for platinum-resistant/refractory SCLC in terms of overall response.FOLFIRI was well-tolerated in platinum resistant/refractory SLCL patients.FOLFIRI could represent a potential new treatment for SCLC, prospective studies are needed.

Therapeutic Treatment Plan Optimization during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comprehensive Physicochemical Compatibility Study of Intensive Care Units Selected Drugs.

BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has resulted in a dramatic rise of the demand for medical devices and drugs. In this context, an important shortage of programmable syringe pumps, used to administrate different drugs in intensive care units, was seen. The opportunity of administrating combinations of five intensive care units selected drugs (Sufentanil, Clonidine, Loxapine, Midazolam, and Ketamine) was considered. METHODS: The drug mixtures were studied in a pure form or diluted in NaCl 0.9% or G5%. Twenty-six possible combinations of the five drugs were produced in glass vials or polypropylene syringes and stored at 25 °C for 14 days. The LC method was implemented to study drugs combinations in the presence of the degradation products. The clearness and pH were also monitored. RESULTS: All the 26 possible combinations displayed adequate physicochemical stability at 25 °C: at least 3 days and 7 days, respectively, for the dilution in 0.9% NaCl or glucose 5%, and the pure drug products mixtures. CONCLUSIONS: The study provided sufficient stability results, covering the medication administration period of at least three days. The combination of more than two drugs offers the advantage of minimizing the individual doses and reduces unwanted side-effects. Hence, this study opens up the possibility of combining the five drugs in one single syringe, which is useful especially under the current circumstances associated with an important shortage of programmable syringe pumps and pharmaceuticals.

Physical and chemical stability of a generic etoposide formulation as an alternative to etoposide phosphate.

The generic Mylan® etoposide (ETP) has been investigated as an alternative for Etopophos®, in part due to a global shortage of the latter. The generic alternative is different both in its formulation and in its very limited stability (6 h at 25 °C against 4 days for Etopophos®) once reconstituted in ready-to-use chloride or glucose solutions. Its intrinsic stability has been thoroughly studied under various conditions. Two degradation products resulting from hydrolysis were characterized by LC-HR-MSn and supported by density functional theory calculations of the frontier molecular orbitals energies, molecular electrostatic potential mapping, and Mulliken charge analysis. Chemical degradation increases with temperature and can be fitted to a zero order kinetic model with a half-life of 119 days and a kinetic constant of 0.0028 mM day-1. Precipitation was only observed in solutions at 5 °C and -20 °C indicating that at these temperatures the reconstituted solutions are thermodynamically metastable. In conclusion, ETP at concentrations of 0.68 and 1 mM prepared and stored at 25 °C under good manufacturing practices remained unchanged over a period of 21 days irrespective of the nature of the solvents or the type of container.

[Monitoring and evaluation tools for irinotecan and bevacizumab in glioblastoma: from prescription to patient's information]. / Outils de suivi et d'autoévaluation de l'irinotécan et du bévacizumab dans les glioblastomes : de la prescription à l'information du patient.

In 2007, the use of a new therapeutic association that included two expensive drugs (bevacizumab and irinotecan), used in second line treatment for progressive glioblastoma, led to the increase of the monitoring and self-evaluation of the medical prescriptions. Methodological tools have been designed by neuro-oncologists together with pharmacists of the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital in order to be consistent with the "good use economic contract". Those drugs have not been approved by European authorities in this indication and, moreover, this combination presents adverse effects and contraindications that need to be known by the professionals, the patient and his family. Some documents have been created in order to facilitate prescriptions for neuro-oncologists and others provide monitoring tools for the physicians and nurses. A letter of information targets the patient and his family, another one targets the general practitioner. This is useful for a better coordination between these ones and the hospital. The patient receives a document and a monitoring book in order to inform him about his treatment and help him to prevent and react in time in case of side effects occurrence. Those measures have been designed to put a frame around the prescriptions and to decrease iatrogenic events as well as the economic costs.