RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: It is unclear whether hydroxyapatite (HA) coating of uncemented cups used in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) improves bone ingrowth and reduces the risk of aseptic loosening. We therefore investigated survival of different uncemented cups that were available with or without HA coating. METHOD: We investigated three different cup types used with or without HA coating registered in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database that were inserted due to osteoarthritis (n = 28,605). Cumulative survival rates and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for the risk of revision were calculated. RESULTS: Unadjusted 13-year survival for cup revision due to aseptic loosening was 97.9% (CI: 96.5-99.4) for uncoated and 97.8% (CI: 96.3-99.4) for HA-coated cups. Adjusted HRs were 0.66 (CI 0.42-1.04) for the presence of HA coating during the first 10 years and 0.87 (CI 0.14-5.38) from year 10-13, compared with uncoated cups. When considering the endpoint cup revision for any reason, unadjusted 13-year survival was similar for uncoated (92.5% [CI: 90.1-94.9]) and HA-coated (94.7% [CI: 93.2-96.3]) cups. The risk of revision of any component due to infection was higher in THA with HA-coated cups than in THA with uncoated cups (adjusted HR 1.4 [CI 1.1-1.9]). CONCLUSIONS: HA-coated cups have a similar risk of aseptic loosening as uncoated cups, thus the use of HA coating seems to not confer any added value in terms of implant stability. The risk of infection seemed higher in THA with use of HA-coated cups, an observation that must be investigated further.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos/uso terapéutico , Durapatita/uso terapéutico , Prótesis de Cadera , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugía , Diseño de Prótesis , Falla de Prótesis , Sistema de Registros , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , ReoperaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To estimate and compare the lifetime risk of total knee replacement surgery (TKR) for osteoarthritis (OA) between countries, and over time. METHOD: Data on primary TKR procedures performed for OA in 2003 and 2013 were extracted from national arthroplasty registries in Australia, Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. Life tables and population data were also obtained for each country. Lifetime risk of TKR was calculated for 2003 and 2013 using registry, life table and population data. RESULTS: Marked international variation in lifetime risk of TKR was evident, with females consistently demonstrating the greatest risk. In 2013, Finland had the highest lifetime risk for females (22.8%, 95%CI 22.5-23.1%) and Australia had the highest risk for males (15.4%, 95%CI 15.1-15.6%). Norway had the lowest lifetime risk for females (9.7%, 95%CI 9.5-9.9%) and males (5.8%, 95%CI 5.6-5.9%) in 2013. All countries showed a significant rise in lifetime risk of TKR for both sexes over the 10-year study period, with the largest increases observed in Australia (females: from 13.6% to 21.1%; males: from 9.8% to 15.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Using population-based data, this study identified significant increases in the lifetime risk of TKR in all five countries from 2003 to 2013. Lifetime risk of TKR was as high as 1 in 5 women in Finland, and 1 in 7 males in Australia. These risk estimates quantify the healthcare resource burden of knee OA at the population level, providing an important resource for public health policy development and healthcare planning.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/tendencias , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Australia , Dinamarca , Femenino , Finlandia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , SueciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The disease course of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has become milder in recent years. In this study we investigated the incidence of orthopaedic surgery in patients with RA. METHOD: From the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register we selected joint replacement procedures conducted during the years 1994-2012 (n = 11 337), and from the Norwegian Patient Register we obtained data on synovectomies (n = 4782) and arthrodeses (n = 6022) during 1997-2012. Using Poisson regression we analysed the time trends in the incidence of procedures performed. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in the incidence of arthroplasty surgery (coefficient of -0.050 per year) and synovectomies (coefficient of -0.10) and a declining trend of arthrodeses in patients with RA in the study periods. The greatest reduction was found in procedures involving the wrist and hand. CONCLUSIONS: We found a decrease in orthopaedic surgery in patients with RA that continued into the biologic era and throughout the study period. The general increasing trend in the use of synthetic and biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) thus coincides with less joint destruction and an improved long-term prognosis of patients with RA.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Outcome after total hip arthroplasty (THA) depends on several factors related to the patient, the surgeon and the implant. It has been suggested that the annual number of procedures per hospital affects the prognosis. We aimed to examine if hospital procedure volume was associated with the risk of revision after primary THA in the Nordic countries from 1995 to 2011. DESIGN: The Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database provided information about primary THA, revision and annual hospital volume. Hospitals were divided into five volume groups (1-50, 51-100, 101-200, 201-300, >300). The outcome of interest was risk of revision 1, 2, 5, 10 and 15 years after primary THA. Multivariable regression was used to assess the relative risk (RR) of revision. RESULTS: 417,687 THAs were included. For the 263,176 cemented THAs no differences were seen 1 year after primary procedure. At 2, 5, 10 and 15 years the four largest hospital volume groups had a reduced risk of revision compared to group 1-50. After 10 years RR was for volume group 51-100 0.79 (CI 0.65-0.95), group 101-200 0.76 (CI 0.61-0.95), group 201-300 0.74 (CI 0.57-0.96) and group >300 0.57 (CI 0.46-0.71). For the uncemented THAs an association between hospital volume and risk of revision were only present for hospitals producing 201-300 THAs per year, beginning at years 2 through 5 and in all subsequent time intervals to 15 years. CONCLUSION: Hospital procedure volume was associated with a long term risk of revision after primary cemented THA. Hospitals operating 50 procedures or less per year had an increased risk of revision after 2, 5, 10 and 15 years follow up.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Cementación , Niño , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugía , Falla de Prótesis , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Países Escandinavos y Nórdicos , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
We report the five-year outcome of a randomised controlled trial which used radiostereometric analysis (RSA) to assess the influence of surface oxidised zirconium (OxZr, Oxinium) on polyethylene wear in vivo. A total of 120 patients, 85 women and 35 men with a mean age of 70 years (59 to 80) who were scheduled for primary cemented total hip arthroplasty were randomly allocated to four study groups. Patients were blinded to their group assignment and received either a conventional polyethylene (CPE) or a highly cross-linked (HXL) acetabular component of identical design. On the femoral side patients received a 28 mm head made of either cobalt-chromium (CoCr) or OxZr. The proximal head penetration (wear) was measured with repeated RSA examinations over five years. Clinical outcome was measured using the Harris hip score. There was no difference in polyethylene wear between the two head materials when used with either of the two types of acetabular component (p = 0.3 to 0.6). When comparing the two types of polyethylene there was a significant difference in favour of HXLPE, regardless of the head material used (p < 0.001). In conclusion, we found no advantage of OxZr over CoCr in terms of polyethylene wear after five years of follow-up. Our findings do not support laboratory results which have shown a reduced rate of wear with OxZr. They do however add to the evidence on the better resistance to wear of HXLPE over CPE.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/instrumentación , Cabeza Femoral/cirugía , Prótesis de Cadera , Circonio , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Cementación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Falla de Prótesis , Análisis Radioestereométrico/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
In this study we report the results of thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint replacements in the Norwegian population over a 17-year period. In total, 479 primary replacements performed from 1994 to 2011 were identified in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Implant survival and risk of revision were analyzed using Cox regression analyses. Four different implant designs were compared and time trends were analyzed. The overall 5 and 10 year survivals were 91% and 90%, respectively. The newer metal total arthroplasties did not outperform the older silicone and mono-block implants. At 5 years, the implant survival ranged from 90% to 94% for the different implant brands. Gender, age, and diagnosis did not influence the risk of revision. The incidence of thumb CMC joint replacement did not change during the study period. Despite relatively satisfactory implant survivorship in our register study, current evidence does not support widespread implementation of thumb CMC replacements.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia para la Sustitución de Dedos/estadística & datos numéricos , Articulaciones Carpometacarpianas/cirugía , Pulgar/cirugía , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artritis/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Prótesis Articulares/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega/epidemiología , Falla de Prótesis , Sistema de Registros , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución por Sexo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
We performed a randomised controlled trial comparing computer-assisted surgery (CAS) with conventional surgery (CONV) in total knee replacement (TKR). Between 2009 and 2011 a total of 192 patients with a mean age of 68 years (55 to 85) with osteoarthritis or arthritic disease of the knee were recruited from four Norwegian hospitals. At three months follow-up, functional results were marginally better for the CAS group. Mean differences (MD) in favour of CAS were found for the Knee Society function score (MD: 5.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3 to 11.4, p = 0.039), the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales for 'pain' (MD: 7.7, 95% CI 1.7 to 13.6, p = 0.012), 'sports' (MD: 13.5, 95% CI 5.6 to 21.4, p = 0.001) and 'quality of life' (MD: 7.2, 95% CI 0.1 to 14.3, p = 0.046). At one-year follow-up, differences favouring CAS were found for KOOS 'sports' (MD: 11.0, 95% CI 3.0 to 19.0, p = 0.007) and KOOS 'symptoms' (MD: 6.7, 95% CI 0.5 to 13.0, p = 0.035). The use of CAS resulted in fewer outliers in frontal alignment (> 3° malalignment), both for the entire TKR (37.9% vs. 17.9%, p = 0.042) and for the tibial component separately (28.4% vs 6.3%, p = 0.002). Tibial slope was better achieved with CAS (58.9% vs. 26.3%, p < 0.001). Operation time was 20 minutes longer with CAS. In conclusion, functional results were, statistically, marginally in favour of CAS. Also, CAS was more predictable than CONV for mechanical alignment and positioning of the prosthesis. However, the long-term outcomes must be further investigated.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/rehabilitación , Desviación Ósea/etiología , Desviación Ósea/prevención & control , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Prótesis de la Rodilla , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Ajuste de Prótesis/métodos , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Recuperación de la Función , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/efectos adversos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/rehabilitación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
To achieve pain control after arthroscopic shoulder surgery, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a complement to other analgesics. However, experimental studies have raised concerns that these drugs may have a detrimental effect on soft tissue-to-bone healing and, thus, have a negative effect on the outcome. We wanted to investigate if there are any differences in the clinical outcome after the arthroscopic Bankart procedure for patients who received NSAIDs prescription compared with those who did not. 477 patients with a primary arthroscopic Bankart procedure were identified in the Norwegian shoulder instability register and included in the study. 32.5% received prescription of NSAIDs post-operatively. 370 (78%) of the patients answered a follow-up questionnaire containing the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index (WOSI). Mean follow-up was 21 months. WOSI at follow-up were 75% in the NSAID group and 74% in the control group. 12% of the patients in the NSAID group and 14% in the control group reported recurrence of instability. The reoperation rate was 5% in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups. Prescription of short-term post-operative NSAID treatment in the post-operative period did not influence on the functional outcome after arthroscopic Bankart procedures.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Artroscopía , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/cirugía , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Artroscopía/efectos adversos , Niño , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Reoperación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate implant survival following primary total hip replacement (THR) in younger patients. To describe the diversity in use of cup-stem implant combinations. DESIGN: 29,558 primary THRs osteoarthritis (OA) patients younger than 55 years of age performed from 1995 through 2011 were identified using the Nordic Arthroplasty Registry Association database. We estimated adjusted relative risk (aRR) of revision with 95% confidence interval (CI) using Cox regression. RESULTS: In general, no difference was observed between uncemented and cemented implants in terms of risk of any revision. Hybrid implants were associated with higher risk of any revision (aRR = 1.3, CI: 1.1-1.5). Uncemented implants led to a reduced risk of revision due to aseptic loosening (aRR = 0.5, CI: 0.5-0.6), whereas the risk was similar for hybrid and cemented implants. Compared with cemented implants, both uncemented and hybrid implants led to elevated risk of revision due to other causes, as well as elevated risk of revision due to any reason within 2 years. 183 different uncemented cup-stem implant combinations were registered in Denmark, of these, 172 were used in less than 100 operations which is similar to Norway, Sweden and Finland. CONCLUSIONS: Uncemented implants perform better in relation to long-term risk of aseptic loosening, whereas both uncemented and hybrid rather than cemented implants in patients younger than 55 years had more short-term revisions because problems due to dislocation, periprosthetic fracture and infection has not yet been completely solved. The vast majority of cup-stem combinations were used in very few operations.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Prótesis de Cadera , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugía , Falla de Prótesis/etiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/instrumentación , Cementación , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Sistema de Registros , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Países Escandinavos y NórdicosRESUMEN
We evaluated the rates of survival and cause of revision of seven different brands of cemented primary total knee replacement (TKR) in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register during the years 1994 to 2009. Revision for any cause, including resurfacing of the patella, was the primary endpoint. Specific causes of revision were secondary outcomes. Three posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) fixed modular-bearing TKRs, two fixed non-modular bearing PCR TKRs and two mobile-bearing posterior cruciate-sacrificing TKRs were investigated in a total of 17 782 primary TKRs. The median follow-up for the implants ranged from 1.8 to 6.9 years. Kaplan-Meier 10-year survival ranged from 89.5% to 95.3%. Cox's relative risk (RR) was calculated relative to the fixed modular-bearing Profix knee (the most frequently used TKR in Norway), and ranged from 1.1 to 2.6. The risk of revision for aseptic tibial loosening was higher in the mobile-bearing LCS Classic (RR 6.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8 to 12.1)), the LCS Complete (RR 7.7 (95% CI 4.1 to 14.4)), the fixed modular-bearing Duracon (RR 4.5 (95% CI 1.8 to 11.1)) and the fixed non-modular bearing AGC Universal TKR (RR 2.5 (95% CI 1.3 to 5.1)), compared with the Profix. These implants (except AGC Universal) also had an increased risk of revision for femoral loosening (RR 2.3 (95% CI 1.1 to 4.8), RR 3.7 (95% CI 1.6 to 8.9), and RR 3.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 11.0), respectively). These results suggest that aseptic loosening is related to design in TKR.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Prótesis de la Rodilla , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Cementos para Huesos , Femenino , Humanos , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Falla de Prótesis , Sistema de Registros , ReoperaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The incidence of joint replacements is considered an indicator of symptomatic end-stage osteoarthritis (OA). We analysed data from two national joint replacement registries in order to investigate whether evidence of a pattern of progression of end-stage hip and knee OA could be found in data from large unselected populations. DESIGN: We obtained data on 78,634 hip and 122,096 knee arthroplasties from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry and 19,786 hip and 12,082 knee arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. A multi-state model was developed where individuals were followed from their first recorded hip or knee arthroplasty for OA to receiving subsequent hip and/or knee arthroplasties. We used this model to estimate relative hazard rates and probabilities for each registry separately. RESULTS: The hazard rates of receiving subsequent arthroplasties in non-cognate joints were higher on the contralateral side than on the ipsilateral side to the index arthroplasty, especially if the index was a hip arthroplasty. After 5 years, the estimated probabilities of having received a knee contralateral to the index hip were more than 1.7 times the probabilities of having received a knee ipsilateral to the index hip. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that there is an association between the side of the first hip arthroplasty and side of subsequent knee arthroplasties. Further studies are needed to investigate whether increased risk of receiving an arthroplasty in the contralateral knee is related to having a hip arthroplasty and/or preoperative factors such as pain and altered gait associated with hip OA.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Estadísticos , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/epidemiología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/epidemiología , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Australia/epidemiología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega/epidemiología , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/complicaciones , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugía , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/complicaciones , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
In this prospective study we studied the effect of the inclination angle of the acetabular component on polyethylene wear and component migration in cemented acetabular sockets using radiostereometric analysis. A total of 120 patients received either a cemented Reflection All-Poly ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene or a cemented Reflection All-Poly highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular component, combined with either cobalt-chrome or Oxinium femoral heads. Femoral head penetration and migration of the acetabular component were assessed with repeated radiostereometric analysis for two years. The inclination angle was measured on a standard post-operative anteroposterior pelvic radiograph. Linear regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between the inclination angle and femoral head penetration and migration of the acetabular component. We found no relationship between the inclination angle and penetration of the femoral head at two years' follow-up (p = 0.9). Similarly, our data failed to reveal any statistically significant correlation between inclination angle and migration of these cemented acetabular components (p = 0.07 to p = 0.9).
Asunto(s)
Acetábulo/patología , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Prótesis de Cadera , Falla de Prótesis/etiología , Acetábulo/diagnóstico por imagen , Acetábulo/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cementación , Femenino , Cabeza Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Cabeza Femoral/patología , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/etiología , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polietilenos , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Análisis Radioestereométrico/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To study the association between change in the body mass index (BMI) at different ages and the risk of a later total hip replacement (THR) due to primary osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: A total of 265,725 individuals who had two repeated measurements of weight and height were included from national health screenings. These individuals were followed prospectively. The data were matched with the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and 4,442 of these individuals were identified as having received a THR for primary OA. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to calculate sex-specific relative risks for having a THR according to age at screening and BMI change. RESULTS: Men and women aged 20 years or younger at the first screening in the quartile with the greatest BMI change per year had more than twice the risk of later having a THR compared with those in the quartile with the smallest BMI change per year. For men older than 30 years at the first screening, there was no relationship between BMI gain, or weight gain, and later risk of THR. For older women, BMI gain was associated with risk of THR, but to a lesser degree than in younger women. CONCLUSION: There was a clear relationship between change in BMI and the risk of later THR in young men and women, whereas the association was absent in older men and weaker in older women. It is important to focus on weight control to prevent future OA, and the preventive strategy should be focused on the young population.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugía , Aumento de Peso/fisiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Internal fixation and arthroplasty are the two main options for the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. The optimal treatment remains controversial. Using data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register, we compared the results of hemiarthroplasty and internal screw fixation in displaced femoral neck fractures. METHODS: Data from 4335 patients over seventy years of age who had internal fixation (1823 patients) or hemiarthroplasty (2512 patients) to treat a displaced femoral neck fracture were compared at a minimum follow-up interval of twelve months. One-year mortality, the number of reoperations, and patient self-assessment of pain, satisfaction, and quality of life at four and twelve months were analyzed. Subanalyses of patients with cognitive impairment and reduced walking ability were done. RESULTS: In the arthroplasty group, only contemporary bipolar prostheses were used and uncemented prostheses with modern stems and hydroxyapatite coating accounted for 20.8% (522) of the implants. There were no differences in one-year mortality (27% in the osteosynthesis group and 25% in the arthroplasty group; p = 0.76). There were 412 reoperations (22.6%) performed in the osteosynthesis group and seventy-two (2.9%) in the hemiarthroplasty group during the follow-up period. After twelve months, the osteosynthesis group reported more pain (mean score, 29.9 compared with 19.2), higher dissatisfaction with the operation result (mean score, 38.9 compared with 25.7), and a lower quality of life (mean score, 0.51 compared with 0.60) than the arthroplasty group. All differences were significant (p < 0.001). For patients with cognitive impairment, hemiarthroplasty provided a better functional outcome (less pain, higher satisfaction with the result of the operation, and higher quality of life as measured on the EuroQol visual analog scale) at twelve months (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly should be treated with hemiarthroplasty.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia/métodos , Tornillos Óseos , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Actividades Cotidianas , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Trastornos del Conocimiento/epidemiología , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Femenino , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/mortalidad , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Humanos , Masculino , Noruega/epidemiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Sistema de Registros , Reoperación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register has shown that several designs of uncemented femoral stems give good or excellent survivorship. The overall findings for uncemented total hip replacement however, have been disappointing because of poor results with the use of metal-backed acetabular components. In this study, we exclusively investigated the medium-to long-term performance of primary uncemented metal-backed acetabular components. A total of 9113 primary uncemented acetabular components were implanted in 7937 patients between 1987 and 2007. These were included in a prospective, population-based observational study. All the implants were modular and metal-backed with ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene liners. The femoral heads were made of stainless steel, cobalt-chrome (CoCr) alloy or alumina ceramic. In all, seven different designs of acetabular component were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier survivorship method and Cox regression analysis. Most acetabular components performed well up to seven years. When the endpoint was revision of the acetabular component because of aseptic loosening, the survival ranged between 87% and 100% at ten years. However, when the endpoint was revision for any reason, the survival estimates were 81% to 92% for the same implants at ten years. Aseptic loosening, wear, osteolysis and dislocation were the main reasons for the relatively poor overall performance of the acetabular components. Prostheses with alumina heads performed slightly better than those with stainless steel or CoCr alloy in subgroups. Whereas most acetabular components performed well at seven years, the survivorship declined with longer follow-up. Fixation was generally good. None of the metal-backed uncemented acetabular components with ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene liners in our study had satisfactory long-term results because of high rates of wear, osteolysis, aseptic loosening and dislocation.
Asunto(s)
Acetábulo/cirugía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Prótesis de Cadera , Anciano , Cementos para Huesos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Metales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polietileno , Diseño de Prótesis , Falla de Prótesis , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Primary uncemented femoral stems reported to the Norwegian arthroplasty register between 1987 and 2005 were included in this prospective observational study. There were 11 516 hips (9679 patients) and 14 different designs of stem. Kaplan-Meier survival probabilities and Cox regression were used to analyse the data. With aseptic loosening as the end-point, all currently used designs performed excellently with survival of 96% to 100% at ten years. With the end-point as stem revision for any cause, the long-term results of the different designs varied from poor to excellent, with survival at 15 years ranging between 29% and 97%. Follow-up for longer than seven years was needed to identify some of the poorly-performing designs. There were differences between the stems; the Corail, used in 5456 hips, was the most frequently used stem with a survival of 97% at 15 years. Male gender was associated with an increased risk of revision of x 1.3 (95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.52), but age and diagnosis had no influence on the results. Overall, modern uncemented femoral stems performed well. Moderate differences in survival between well-performing stems should be interpreted with caution since the differences may be caused by factors other than the stem itself.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Prótesis de Cadera , Cementos para Huesos , Cementación , Femenino , Fémur/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Falla de Prótesis , Sistema de Registros , Factores Sexuales , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
We analysed the results of different strategies in the revision of primary uncemented acetabular components reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. The aim was to compare the risk of further acetabular revision after isolated liner exchange and complete component revision. The results of exchanging well-fixed components were also compared with those of exchanging loose acetabular components. The period studied was between September 1987 and April 2005. The following groups were compared: group 1, exchange of liner only in 318 hips; group 2, exchange of well-fixed components in 398; and group 3, exchange of loose components in 933. We found that the risk of a further cup revision was lower after revision of well-fixed components (relative risk from a Cox model (RR) = 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.37% to 0.87%) and loose components (RR = 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.39% to 0.80%), compared with exchange of the liner in isolation. The most frequent reason for a further acetabular revision was dislocation, accounting for 61 (28%) of the re-revisions. Other reasons for further revision included pain in 27 (12%), loosening in 24 (11%) and infection in 20 (9%). Re-revisions because of pain were less frequent when complete component (fixed or loose) revision was undertaken compared with isolated exchange of the liner (RR = 0.20 (95% confidence interval 0.06% to 0.65%) and RR = 0.10 (95% confidence interval 0.03% to 0.30%), respectively). The risk of further acetabular revision for infection, however, did not differ between the groups. In this study, exchange of the liner only had a higher risk of further cup revision than revision of the complete acetabular component. Our results suggest that the threshold for revising well-fixed components in the case of liner wear and osteolysis should be lowered.
Asunto(s)
Acetábulo/cirugía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Luxación de la Cadera/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Falla de Prótesis , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Sistema de Registros , Reoperación/métodos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de TiempoAsunto(s)
Artritis/cirugía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Artrodesis/estadística & datos numéricos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , SinovectomíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Concern exists regarding the durability of unicompartmental knee replacements. The purpose of the present study was to compare the early failure rates and failure mechanisms of primary cemented unicompartmental knee replacements with those of primary cemented tricompartmental total knee replacements. METHODS: The rates of failure of primary cemented unicompartmental knee replacements (n = 2288) and tricompartmental total knee replacements (n = 3032) as reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from January 1994 through December 2004 were compared with use of Kaplan-Meier estimated survival rates and Cox multiple regression. RESULTS: The ten-year survival probability was 80.1% (95% confidence interval, 76.0% to 84.2%) for unicompartmental knee replacements, compared with 92.0% (95% confidence interval, 90.4 to 93.6%) for total knee replacements, with a relative risk of revision of 2.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.6 to 2.5) (p < 0.001). This increased risk of revision following unicompartmental knee replacement was seen in all age-categories. Unicompartmental knee replacement was associated with an increased risk of revision due to pain (relative risk, 11.3 [95% confidence interval, 4.8 to 26.8]; p < 0.001), aseptic loosening of the tibial component (relative risk, 1.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 3.0]; p = 0.01) and of the femoral component (relative risk, 4.8 [95% confidence interval, 2.3 to 10.3]; p < 0.001), and periprosthetic fracture (relative risk, 3.2 [95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 8.9]; p = 0.02) as compared with total knee replacement. Unicompartmental knee replacement was associated with a lower risk of infection compared with total knee replacement (relative risk, 0.28 [95% confidence interval, 0.10 to 0.74]; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The survival of cemented unicompartmental knee replacements is inferior to that of cemented tricompartmental total knee replacements in all age-categories.