Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Infect Dis ; 223(3): 381-388, 2021 02 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32889532

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Care homes have experienced a high number of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related deaths among residents since the onset of the pandemic. However, up to May 2020, there has been a lack of information about the extent of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among residents and staff in care homes and limited testing in this setting. METHODS: Combined nose and throat swab testing for SARS-CoV-2 RNA was carried out in 2455 residents and staff across 37 care homes in the London Borough of Bromley across a 3-week period. Results were reported within 24 hours of sample delivery, and data were collected on the presence or absence of symptoms. RESULTS: Overall, the point prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 6.5%, with a higher rate in residents (9.0%) than in staff (4.7%). A key finding was the high proportion of asymptomatic infection detected in staff (69%) and residents (51%), with evidence of underdetection of symptoms by care home staff. CONCLUSIONS: The high proportion of asymptomatic infection combined with underdetection of symptoms by care home staff indicates that offering a test to all residents and staff in care homes with rapid reporting of results would assist accurate identification of infected individuals, facilitating prompt infection prevention and control action.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/virología , Hogares para Ancianos/estadística & datos numéricos , ARN Viral/genética , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Asintomáticas/epidemiología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Prueba de COVID-19/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Londres/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Prevalencia , ARN Viral/aislamiento & purificación , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Adulto Joven
2.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 139(6): 1830-1839.e13, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27773851

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Repeated low-dose grass pollen intradermal allergen injection suppresses allergen-induced cutaneous late-phase responses comparably with conventional subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of grass pollen intradermal immunotherapy in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. METHODS: We randomly assigned 93 adults with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis to receive 7 preseasonal intradermal allergen injections (containing 7 ng of Phl p 5 major allergen) or a histamine control. The primary end point was daily combined symptom-medication scores during the 2013 pollen season (area under the curve). Analysis was by intention to treat. Skin biopsy specimens were collected after intradermal allergen challenges, and late-phase responses were measured 4 and 7, 10, or 13 months after treatment. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the primary end point between treatment arms (active, n = 46; control, n = 47; median difference, 14; 95% CI, -172.5 to 215.1; P = .80). Among secondary end points, nasal symptoms were worse in the intradermal treatment group, as measured based on daily (median difference, 35; 95% CI, 4.0-67.5; P = .03) and visual analog scale (median difference, 53; 95% CI, -11.6 to 125.2; P = .05) scores. In a per-protocol analysis intradermal immunotherapy was further associated with worse asthma symptoms and fewer symptom-free days. Intradermal immunotherapy increased serum Phleum pratense-specific IgE levels (P = .001) compared with those in the control arm. T cells cultured from biopsy specimens of subjects undergoing intradermal immunotherapy had higher expression of the TH2 surface marker CRTH2 (P = .04) and lower expression of the TH1 marker CXCR3 (P = .01), respectively. Late-phase responses remained inhibited 7 months after treatment (P = .03). CONCLUSION: Intradermal allergen immunotherapy suppressed skin late-phase responses but was not clinically effective and resulted in worsening of respiratory allergic symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Phleum/inmunología , Polen/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/terapia , Adulto , Alérgenos/inmunología , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Inyecciones Intradérmicas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/sangre , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/patología , Piel/patología , Células Th2/inmunología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA