Combined ethinylestradiol/gestodene contraceptive patch: two-center, open-label study of ovulation inhibition, acceptability and safety over two cycles in female volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: Determination of the ovulation inhibition efficacy of a new, transparent, transdermal, combined hormonal contraceptive patch (area 10 cm2) containing 0.9 mg ethinylestradiol and 1.9 mg gestodene in an open-label study of healthy, female volunteers (aged 18-35 years). METHODS: A total of 199 volunteers from two centers were requested to use the contraceptive patch (one patch/week for 3 weeks, followed by 1 week of no treatment), throughout two menstrual cycles. Ovarian activity was monitored by transvaginal ultrasonography and serum hormone determinations, and classified according to the Hoogland score. RESULTS: Ovulation inhibition was achieved in all participants (Hoogland score < 6). Secondary efficacy measures, including suppression of serum concentrations of estradiol and progesterone, and of the mid-cycle luteinizing hormone surge, confirmed ovulation inhibition. Ovulation returned in 85.7% of participants during the first cycle after cessation of treatment. There were no abnormal changes in safety parameters. A large majority of users rated the contraceptive patch as 'very convenient'. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the new, combined ethinylestradiol/gestodene contraceptive patch was highly effective in reversibly inhibiting ovulation, well tolerated and regarded as 'very convenient' by the majority of users. This new, transparent, transdermal matrix patch is an attractive alternative form of contraception.

Discussion on early clinical drug development in the target population with respect to the field of reproductive endocrinology.

The study populations taking part in early clinical drug development of reproductive endocrine treatments are discussed. After having compared subjects in phase I studies with subsequent target populations, the question was posed as to whether the inclusion of the later target population could accelerate the developmental process. This applies only to certain specific clinical questions that are posed in phase I studies. From the authors' perspective, the key goal of rapid and well-structured early drug development is to be attained by using reliable surrogate markers that are able to reflect the clinical effects.

Short-term treatment with levonorgestrel does not antagonize the ethinyl estradiol-induced increase of uterine blood flow in postmenopausal women.

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of a short-term ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel medication on blood flow in the uterine arteries in postmenopausal women in a prospective placebo-controlled double-blind study. Twenty-one healthy postmenopausal woman at least 2 years after menopause received 60 micrograms ethinyl estradiol (EE) for 14 days followed by 40 micrograms EE plus 125 micrograms levonorgestrel (LNG) for 12 days (total treatment period 26 days). Sonographically, uterine volume, endometrial thickness, and blood flow in the uterine arteries [as reflected by pulsatility (PI) and resistance indices (RI)] were measured. Uterine size increased from 44 to 80 mL (day 14, p < 0.001) and 87 mL (day 26, p = NS). Endometrium grew from 3 to 8 mm (day 14, p < 0.001) and 11 mm (day 26, p = NS). Uterine arterial PI fell from 2.76 to 1.37 (day 14, p < 0.001) and 1.34 (day 26, p = NS), whereas RI fell from 0.9 to 0.68 (day 14 and day 26, p < 0.001). In conclusion, short-term treatment with LNG does not antagonize the vascular effect of EE on the uterine arteries as reflected by PI and RI. This result might have clinical significance in the selection of the progestin used in hormonal replacement therapy.

PIP: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of a short-term ethinyl estradiol (EE)/levonorgestrel (LNG) medication on blood flow in the uterine arteries in postmenopausal women in a prospective placebo-controlled double-blind study. 21 healthy postmenopausal women, at least 2 years after menopause, received 60 mcg EE for 14 days followed by 40 mcg EE plus 125 mcg LNG for 12 days (total treatment period: 26 days). Sonographically, uterine volume, endometrial thickness, and blood flow in the uterine arteries [as reflected by the pulsatility index (PI) and the resistance index (RI)] were measured. Uterine volume increased from 44 to 80 ml (day 14, p 0.001) and 87 ml (day 26, p = NS). Endometrial thickness increased from 3 to 8 mm (day 14, p 0.001) and 11 mm (day 26, p = NS). Uterine arterial PI fell from 2.76 to 1.37 (day 14, p 0.001) and 1.34 (day 26, p = NS), whereas RI fell from 0.9 to 0.68 (day 14 and day 26, p 0.001). In conclusion, short-term treatment with LNG does not antagonize the vascular effect of EE on the uterine arteries as reflected by PI and RI. This result might have clinical significance in the selection of the progestin used in hormonal replacement therapy.

Adverse events and discomfort in studies on healthy subjects: the volunteer's perspective. A survey conducted by the German Association for Applied Human Pharmacology.

OBJECTIVE: The various good clinical practice (GCP) guidelines do not define the volunteering subject as an active party. The present survey addresses the volunteer's perception of study-related inconvenience and risk and its impact on their decision to enroll. METHODS: The survey consisted of a questionnaire to be filled out voluntarily and anonymously by healthy subjects who volunteered for enrollment in human pharmacology studies and who had participated in at least one previous study. Twenty-five categorised multiple-choice questions covered previous study experience, motives for volunteering, perception of and compliance with study directives and restrictions, past experience with adverse events, impact of the study environment on perceived well-being and the nature of adverse events likely to discourage them from enrollment. RESULTS: Seven centres contributed by providing at least 30 (range 30-100) evaluable questionnaires. The database consists of a total of 440 healthy subjects (30.5% females, 69.5% males), from 18 to over 60 years of age. Two hundred and seven subjects (47.1%) were company employees and 233 (52.9%) were external volunteers. Eighty nine percent only participated in studies at one particular centre. Some 53.3% indicated financial motives, 27.8% 'contribution to an improvement of pharmacotherapy', 12.7% 'social responsibility', while 6.2% indicated other motives, mainly the opportunity of a free medical check-up. Thirteen subjects (3%) admitted to not answering correctly to the recruitment questions; this limited reliability is suspected to be even larger when the answer might preclude enrollment. From the volunteers' perspective, the environmental study conditions clearly appeared to have a highly relevant impact on their personal well-being. Some 17.1% of the subjects reported to have suffered adverse events occasionally and 2.7% frequently; but 14% admitted not reporting adverse events promptly and about 20% indicated that, with respect to previous adverse events, they first sought advice from other volunteers rather than from the investigator. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events and inconveniences are inherent to nontherapeutic studies in healthy subjects. From the volunteer's perspective it appears that the incidence of adverse experiences in such studies exceeds the reported frequencies from investigators considerably. This finding suggests that investigators are usually not aware or able to ascertain the true incidence of adverse events. The present survey also confirms that pertinent information on the personal history may be unreliable. Volunteers are reluctant to answer questions regarding, in particular, their smoking habits, caffeine and alcohol consumption. Regarding the matter of informed consent, a noteworthy contradiction between the volunteers' attitude and behaviour became apparent. Although the volunteers admit that even rather minor adverse events ordinarily would discourage them, they still consent to enrollment. In view of this apparent contradiction, there is no alternative to the investigator's personal responsibility to counsel and protect the subject. Surveys such as this one may contribute to the awareness that the explicitness of GCP guidelines merely define the format, but not the content quality of these fundamental ethical values, which remain the unique burden and challenge of the investigator.

[Estrogenic effects after 14-days administration of 0.06 mg ethinyl estradiol in postmenopausal women]. / Ostrogene Effekte nach 14tägiger Gabe von 0.06 mg Ethinylestradiol bei postmenopausalen Frauen.

The effect of a 26 day oestrogen-gestogene sequence therapy on double endometrium thickness, uterus size, blood flow in the uterine blood vessels (pulsatility and resistance index), serum concentration of FSH, LH and SHBG and on vaginal cytology of postmenopausal women was tested double-blind in a placebo-controlled trial. Thirteen postmenopausal women received 0.06 mg ethinyloestradiol (EE2) over 14 days and then a 12 day combination treatment with 0.04 mg EE2 and 0.125 mg levonorgestrel. Eight women received placebo treatment over 26 days. In each group, half the women were less, and half were more than 10 years postmenopausal. The above parameters were unchanged in the placebo group. However, in the verum group, the double endometrium thickness increased from 2 mm to about 6 mm after a 7 day treatment with EE2 and after a further treatment week with EE2, increased another millimeter. There was no obvious difference in the treatment groups between women less than ten years after menopause or more than ten years after menopause. Blood flow in the uterine artery increased significantly (decrease in pulsatility and resistance index by about 50%). Again, there did not seem to be any obvious connection with the menopausal interval. FSH decreased after the first treatment week by about 50% and 65% after the second treatment week. There was no significant decrease in LH. SHBG increased by about a factor of 5. An oestrogen effect could be demonstrated in the vaginal cytology of all cases in the verum group.

A single-dose and 3-month clinical-pharmacokinetic study with a new combination oral contraceptive.

The study was performed in 14 young women. The combination oral contraceptive contained 75 microgram gestodene (GSD) and 20 microgram ethinyl estradiol (EE2) per dosage unit. The volunteers received a single dose on day 21 of a treatment-free precycle (PCd21) and, after a washout period of 7 days, used the preparation in a 21 d/7 d schedule for three months. Daily drug serum level profiles were taken on PCd21 and on days 1 and 21 of treatment cycles 1 and 3. In addition, trough drug serum levels were followed every other day during treatment cycles 1 and 3. Serum levels of GSD, EE2, CBG, SHBG and testosterone (T) were determined by means of specifically developed or commercially available RIAs. Pharmacokinetic evaluation was carried out with TOPFIT and parameters were evaluated for differences with the t-test. Main target variables were Cmax, tmax and AUC for EE2, GSD and unbound GSD on day 21, cycle 3 vs. PCd21. EE2 pharmacokinetics were in agreement with a dose of 20 microgram/unit. Single-dose Cmax of 65 pg/ml and AUC of 612 pg h ml(-1) increased by 40-60% during treatment cycles as a result of accumulation EE2 induced basal SHBG (102nmol/L) and CBG (42 microgram/ml) serum levels to about 220 nmol/L and 87 microgram/ml, respectively, at the end of treatment cycles 1 and 3. Serum T levels dropped to 50% of baseline levels during treatment cycles and free T concentrations were reduced by 60-70%. GSD pharmacokinetics at the end of treatment cycles 1 and 3 were different from single-dose pharmacokinetics. Single-dose Cmax of 3.5 ng/ml and AUC 0-24 h of 22 ng h ml(-1) increased to steady-state levels of 8-8.7 ng/ml and 90-106 ng h ml(-1), respectively. The increase in GSD levels under treatment is the result of two parallel processes, i.e. accumulation and enlargement of the specific binding compartment. This was shown by protein-binding experiments, demonstrating an increase in specific (SHBG) binding from 69% to 80% and a reduction in the free fraction of GSD by 40% during treatment. The results of GSD and EE2 pharmacokinetics obtained in the present study confirm previous results with Femodene, when the reduction in the EE2 dose by 10 microgram/d is taken into account.

[Dealing with adverse effects in phase I trials]. / Umgang mit Unerwünschten Ereignissen in Phase-I-Prüfungen.

A questionnaire was completed by members of the Association for Applied Human Pharmacology (AGAH) in Germany with the aim of assessing the present situation regarding management of adverse events (AEs). A recommendation for documentation and evaluation of AEs was to be presented after discussion within the AGAH. The questionnaire referred to general questions, documentation of AEs, intensity and causality, coding and serious adverse events (SAE). Percentage return of answered questionnaires was 54.5%. Of the people contacted, 9.1% said they did not carry out phase I trials, and 36.4% did not reply. The survey in the 24 institutes convers an estimated 11200 volunteers who are included in clinical trials each year. The discussion about commencement of AEs documentation and its duration was contentious. Of the respondents, 38.5% AEs only after application of the trial substance, while 61.5% also make a documentation during the pre-trial phase (recruitment, pre-examination, supervision before application). 13.6% document only up to the post-examination and half of those questioned until AE symptoms have disappeared. 22.7% document until disappearance of symptoms only when AEs are definitely associated with the trial substance. A 3-point scale is used by most people questioned for evaluation of the intensity of an AE. Evaluation of causality, mostly undertaken by the examining physician and the director of the clinical trial, is not carried out homogeneously. There are several categories, but four classifications are most commonly used. 62.5% of codings of AEs are carried out according to the WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of the local and systemic side effects of methylprednisolone aceponate and mometasone furoate applied as ointments with equal antiinflammatory activity.

BACKGROUND: The therapy for skin diseases with topical glucocorticoids is limited by their local and systemic side effects. A glucocorticoid with an improved benefit-to-risk ratio is desirable. OBJECTIVE: A new topical corticoid, methylprednisolone aceponate (MPA) 0.1% ointment, was compared with the same formulation of mometasone furoate. METHODS: The two ointments were compared with respect to suppression of UVB light-induced erythema (n = 20) and with respect to atrophogenicity and appearance of telangiectasia (n = 20) in two double-blind trials with intraindividual comparisons in healthy volunteers. In a third trial, serum cortisol levels were measured in volunteers receiving extensive (60% of body surface) cutaneous application of MPA (n = 10) or mometasone furoate (n = 11). RESULTS: MPA and mometasone furoate were equally effective in suppressing UVB light-induced erythema. Atrophogenicity, as well as the incidence and severity of telangiectasia, were significantly more pronounced with mometasone furoate than with MPA. Both ointments decreased serum cortisol levels and did not differ significantly in this respect. However, the incidence of serum cortisol level suppression was higher in the mometasone furoate group than in the MPA group. CONCLUSION: MPA ointment has equal antiinflammatory activity and similar cortisol suppression but significantly fewer local side effects than mometasone furoate.