Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Chirurg ; 77(4): 352-9, 2006 Apr.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16477431

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The medical faculty of Heidelberg University implemented a new problem-based clinical curriculum (Heidelberg Curriculum Medicinale, or Heicumed) in 2001. The present study analyses the evaluation data of two student cohorts prior to the introduction of Heicumed. Its aim was to specify problems of the traditional training and to draw conclusions for implementation of a new curriculum. METHODS: The evaluation instrument was the Heidelberg Inventory for the Evaluation of Teaching (HILVE-I). The data were analysed calculating differences in the means between defined groups, with the 13 primary scales of the HILVE I-instrument as dependent variables. RESULTS: Teaching method and subject had no systematic influence on evaluation results. Thus, didactic lecture in orthopedic surgery achieved better results than small group tutorials, while the data on vascular and general surgery showed opposite results. Major factors for success were continuity and didactic training of lecturers and tutors. This is convincingly reflected by the results of the lecture course "Differential diagnosis in general surgery". The good evaluation data on small group tutorials resulted largely from the "participation" and "discussion" scales, which represent interactivity in learning. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest the importance of two major pedagogic ideas: continuity and didactic training of lecturers and tutors. These principles were widely implemented in Heicumed and have contributed to the success of the new curriculum.


Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Cirugía General/educación , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Estudios de Cohortes , Curriculum , Evaluación Educacional , Docentes Médicos , Alemania , Humanos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Facultades de Medicina , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/educación
6.
Br J Surg ; 85(9): 1260-5, 1998 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9752872

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Emergency surgery for colorectal cancer has become more aggressive and radical over the past decade. This retrospective review analyses the impact on outcome. METHODS: The results of emergency surgery within 24 h of admission were compared between 1982 and 1987 (77 patients) and 1988 and 1993 (75 patients). Patient and tumour characteristics were similar in both groups. RESULTS: Right colonic obstruction or perforation was treated by primary resection and anastomosis in 11 of 12 patients before 1988 and in all 19 patients thereafter. Primary resection was also the treatment of choice for perforated cancer of the left colon and rectum before 18 of 20) and after (20 of 21) 1988. The rate of primary resection for obstructing cancer of the left colon and rectum increased from 17 of 45 to 30 of 35. One-stage resections for obstructing cancer were performed in ten of 45 and 22 of 35 patients before and after 1988 respectively. The overall mortality rate declined from 14 of 77 to three of 75 after 1988 (P< 0.01). The rate of radical lymphadenectomy rose from six of 46 patients to 42 of 69 after 1988. The 3-year survival rate increased from 50 to 74 per cent (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The data support further efforts towards improving the immediate and late outcome of emergency surgery in complicated colorectal cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Neoplasias del Colon/etiología , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Urgencias Médicas , Femenino , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/patología , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Perforación Intestinal/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Neoplasias del Recto/etiología , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 103(18): 773-7, 1978 May 05.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-648347

RESUMEN

Among 947 patients operated on for gastric carcinoma between 1961 and 1976 there were 60 with early (superficial) gastric carcinoma. All but two patients consulted their doctor for diverse complaints. In one third of them treatment was delayed for a year or longer. In 26 of the 64 cancer foci it was limited to the mucosa. The correct diagnosis was made radiologically in 60%, gastroscopically in 70%. Selective endoscopic biopsy increased accuracy to 90%. The remaining false-negative findings occurred in the ulcerative form, which was the most frequent one. Improved radiological techniques (double-contrast) and obligatory gastroscopy with biopsy increased the relative proportion of early (superficial) carcinoma from under 4% in 1961 to 15%. The diagnosis of this type of carcinoma can be made only by careful histological study of the surgical specimens. Here as elsewhere in the surgery of carcinoma, multicentricity (in 5%) and possible lymph node metastases (10-20%) must be taken consideration in the surgical management.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Biopsia , Medios de Contraste , Errores Diagnósticos , Femenino , Gastroscopía , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía , Factores Sexuales , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...