Pain Associated With Continuous Intravenous Infusion of Bumetanide: A Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: Bumetanide can induce generalized musculoskeletal pain when administered as a continuous infusion, an effect that may be underrecognized. The purpose of this case series is to educate health care providers about the incidence and presentation of pain associated with bumetanide infusions, adding to the existing literature describing this adverse event. CLINICAL FINDINGS: Of 40 critically ill patients, 15 (38%) had increased pain scores after initiation of a continuous infusion of bumetanide, with symptoms commonly occurring 12 to 24 hours after initiation of the infusion. Reported descriptions of the pain included generalized aching, soreness, burning, allodynia, headaches, and exacerbation of underlying pain in localized areas. Increases in patient-reported pain correlated directly with initiation of the continuous infusion of bumetanide. DIAGNOSIS: Four of the 15 bumetanide-associated pain events (27%) were recognized as such by the health care team. INTERVENTIONS: Bumetanide was promptly discontinued in the 4 identified cases. The 11 patients (73%) whose pain was not recognized as related to bumetanide remained on a continuous infusion of bumetanide and received pain medications including opioids. Infusions were stopped when patients transitioned to dialysis (n = 8 [53%]), began receiving comfort care (n = 5 [33%]), or completed diuresis therapy (n = 2 [13%]). OUTCOMES: For all patients, pain symptoms resolved within 24 to 48 hours after discontinuation of bumetanide infusion with no significant electrolyte abnormalities. CONCLUSION: Bumetanide-induced pain is more common than previously described. Early recognition of this adverse event can prevent patient discomfort and escalation of treatment.

Effect of Postdismissal Pharmacist Visits for Patients Using High-Risk Medications.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a pharmacist visit after hospital dismissal for patients taking at least 1 medication that places patients at high risk for emergent hospital admissions (termed high-risk medication) would decrease the risk of hospital readmission at 30 days compared with usual care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study at a tertiary care center conducted from July 26, 2013, through April 1, 2016. We reviewed outcomes among patients who did or did not have a post-hospital dismissal pharmacist visit immediately before a clinician visit. We included patients who were at least 18 years old and were taking at least 10 total medications at hospital dismissal, 1 or more of which were high-risk medications. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the risk of 30-day readmission between the groups. RESULTS: The study cohort included 502 patients in each group (pharmacist + clinician group and clinician-only group). After adjusting for differences in background demographic characteristics, patients in the pharmacist + clinician group were significantly less likely to be readmitted to the hospital within 30 days postdismissal compared with the clinician-only group (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35-0.69; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Patients seen by a pharmacist immediately before a clinician visit after hospital dismissal had a lower risk of readmission than patients who had a clinician-only visit. Patients taking high-risk medications for hospital admissions are ideal candidates for pharmacist involvement.