Development and psychometric evaluation of a novel tool for assessing patient perception and preference for haemophilia treatment (HaemoPREF).

Prophylactic use of treatment is important for good outcomes in haemophilia, yet adherence can be suboptimal. To better understand the relationship between treatment adherence and patients' beliefs about treatment there is a need to quantify patients' treatment attitudes. The aim of this study was to develop a brief, clinically relevant, patient-reported outcome (PRO) to measure ease of use and patients' preference for haemophilia treatment. A 40-item questionnaire was completed by male adults with haemophilia A from Austria, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. Robust statistical methods for item evaluation including item-level statistics, dimensionality analyses and input from clinical and outcomes experts were used to inform item reduction. Retained items were subjected to psychometric evaluation including exploratory factor analysis (EFA), known-groups validity and internal consistency reliability. 273 patients completed the questionnaire. Of the 40 items, 28 items were flagged for possible deletion based on item-level statistics, three of which were retained due to clinical relevance. Two items had acceptable statistical performance but were deleted based on low clinical relevance. A total of 13 items were retained. EFA produced a conceptually defined 5-factor solution. The survey had acceptable known-groups validity and internal consistency. Refinements were made to wording and scoring, and one new item was added to assess general ease of use, resulting in a 14-item questionnaire - the HaemoPREF. Preliminary measurement properties of the HaemoPREF support the instrument to evaluate patient perception and preference for haemophilia treatment. Further psychometric evaluation is required to examine and confirm the measurement properties of the scale.

Polyunsaturated fatty acid status of Dutch vegans and omnivores.

We compared the polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) status of Dutch vegans and omnivores to investigate whether disparities can be explained by different diets and long chain PUFA (LCP) synthesis rates. Dietary intakes and fatty acid compositions of erythrocytes (RBC), platelets (PLT), plasma cholesterol esters (CE) and plasma triglycerides (TG) of 12 strict vegans and 15 age- and sex-matched omnivores were determined. Vegans had higher omega 6 (CE, TG), 18:2 omega 6 (RBC, CE, TG), 18:3 omega 6 (TG), 20:3 omega 6 (TG), 22:4 omega 6 (TG), 22:5 omega 3 (RBC, PLT), 22:5 omega 3/22:6 omega 3 (RBC, PLT) and 22:5 omega 6/22:6 omega 3 (RBC, PLT), and lower 22:4 omega 6 (RBC, PLT), 22:4 omega 6/22:5 omega 6 (RBC, PLT), omega 3 (CE), LCP omega 3 (CE, TG), 20:5 omega 3 (RBC, PLT, CE), 22:5 omega 3 (TG) and 22:6 omega 3 (all compartments). Vegans had lower 20:4 omega 6 (TG) after normalization of PUFA to 100%, and normalization of eicosanoid precursors to 100% revealed similar 20:4 omega 6 (all), higher 20:3 omega 6 (TG) and lower 20:5 omega 3 (all). High omega 6 (notably 18:2 omega 6) and low omega 3 (notably 20:5 omega 3, 22:6 omega 3) status in Dutch vegans derives from low dietary LCP omega 3 and 18:3 omega 3/18:2 omega 6 ratio. Higher 18:3 omega 6 and 20:3 omega 6 in their TG may reflect higher hepatic 20:4 omega 6 production rate, whereas higher 20:4 omega 6 and 22:4 omega 6 in omnivores indicates 20:4 omega 6 intake from meat.

Gamma-linolenic acid does not augment long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid omega-3 status.

Augmentation of long chain polyunsaturated omega3 fatty acid (LCPUFA omega3) status can be reached by consumption of fish oil or by improvement of the conversion of alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) to LCPUFA omega3. Since gamma-linolenic acid (GLA) might activate the rate-limiting delta-6 desaturation, we investigated whether GLA augments LCPUFA omega3 status. Eight adults received 1.4 g GLA for 4 weeks and subsequently 2.2 g ALA+1.4 g GLA daily during another 4 weeks. Another seven adults received a daily oral dose of 2.2 g ALA for 4 weeks, and subsequently 2.2 g ALA+1.4 g GLA during another 4 weeks. ALA, or ALA+GLA, did not significantly augment EPA and DHA contents. We conclude that the LCPUFA omega3 status can not be improved by supplementation of low dose GLA, neither by co-supplementation of ALA. Poor conversion of ALA to LCPUFA omega3 may be caused by preferential beta-oxidation of ALA, negative feedback of arachidonic acid from the omnivorous diet, or by the low dietary ALA/LA ratio.