Through the Looking Glass: How the COVID-19 Pandemic Changed International Branch Campuses' Academic Experience and Home Campus Relationship.

This study examines how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the academic experience at international branch campuses (IBCs) and has changed the relationship between the IBC and the home campus. Semi-structured interviews with 26 leaders, academic staff, and students at seven IBCs in Malaysia revealed that the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the experience at IBCs in unique ways, including collaboration and communication with the home campus; increasing campus-specific resources for student wellbeing; and playing a larger role in student enrollment, recruitment, and mobility initiatives. Findings provide useful insights for higher education institutions (HEIs) engaged in transnational education (TNE).

Influence of PBL with open-book tests on knowledge retention measured with progress tests.

The influence of problem-based learning (PBL) and open-book tests on long-term knowledge retention is unclear and subject of discussion. Hypotheses were that PBL as well as open-book tests positively affect long-term knowledge retention. Four progress test results of fifth and sixth-year medical students (n = 1,648) of three medical schools were analyzed. Two schools had PBL driven curricula, and the third one had a traditional curriculum (TC). One of the PBL schools (PBLob) used a combination of open-book (assessing backup knowledge) and closed-book tests (assessing core knowledge); the other two schools (TC and PBLcb) only used closed-book tests. The items of the progress tests were divided into core and backup knowledge. T tests (with Bonferroni correction) were used to analyze differences between curricula. PBL students performed significantly better than TC students on core knowledge (average effect size (av ES) = 0.37-0.74) and PBL students tested with open-book tests scored somewhat higher than PBL students tested without such tests (av ES = 0.23-0.30). Concerning backup knowledge, no differences were found between the scores of the three curricula. Students of the two PBL curricula showed a substantially better long-term knowledge retention than TC students. PBLob students performed somewhat better on core knowledge than PBLcb students. These outcomes suggest that a problem-based instructional approach in particular can stimulate long-term knowledge retention. Distinguishing knowledge into core and backup knowledge and using open-book tests alongside closed-book tests could enhance long-term core knowledge retention.

Directing students to profound open-book test preparation: the relationship between deep learning and open-book test time.

BACKGROUND: Considering the growing amount of medical knowledge and the focus of medical education on acquiring competences, using open-book tests seems inevitable. A possible disadvantage of these tests is that students underestimate test preparation. AIMS: We examined whether students who used a deep learning approach needed less open-book test time, and how students performed on open-book questions asked in a closed-book setting. METHOD: Second- (N = 491) and third-year students (N = 325) prepared half of the subject matter to be tested closed-book and half to be tested open-book. In agreement with the Board of Examiners, some questions in the closed-book test concerned open-book subject matter, and vice versa. Data were gathered about test time, deep learning and preparation time. Repeated measurement analysis, t-tests and partial correlations were used to analyse the data. RESULTS: We found a negative relationship between deep learning and open-book test time for second-year students. Students scored the lowest on closed-book questions about open-book subject matter. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of the available test time might force students to prepare longer and deeper for open-book tests. Further research is needed to identify variables that influence open-book test time and to determine how restrictive this time should be.