RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The patients with unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma require biliary drainage to relieve symptoms and allow for palliative systemic chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to establish the success, complication, and mortality rates of the initial biliary drainage in patients with unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma at presentation. METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, patients with unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent initial endoscopic or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage between 2002 and 2014 were included. The success of drainage was defined as a successful biliary stent or drain placement, no unscheduled reintervention within 14 days, and serum bilirubin levels <50 µmol/L (ie, 2.9 mg/dL) or a >50% decrease in serum bilirubin after 14 days. Severe complications, and 90-day mortality were recorded. RESULTS: Included were 186 patients: 161 (87%) underwent initial endoscopic biliary drainage and 25 (13%) underwent initial percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. The success of initial drainage was observed in 73 patients (45%) after endoscopic biliary drainage and 6 (24%) after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. The reasons for an unsuccessful initial drainage were: the failure to place a drain or stent in 39 patients (21%), an unplanned reintervention within 14 days in 52 patients (28%), and the bilirubin level >50 µmol/L (or not halved) after 14 days of initial drainage in 16 patients (9%). Severe drainage-related complications occurred in 19 patients (12%) after endoscopic biliary drainage and in 3 (12%) after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Overall, 66 patients (36%) died within 90 days after initial biliary drainage. CONCLUSION: Initial biliary drainage in patients with unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma had a success rate of 45% and a 90-day mortality rate of 36%. Future studies for patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma should focus on improving biliary drainage.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares , Colangiocarcinoma , Tumor de Klatskin , Humanos , Tumor de Klatskin/cirugía , Tumor de Klatskin/complicaciones , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/complicaciones , Colangiocarcinoma/cirugía , Drenaje/efectos adversos , Stents/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Conductos Biliares Intrahepáticos/patología , Bilirrubina , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiología , Espera Vigilante/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis. Best practices for the use of chemotherapy, enzyme replacement therapy, and biliary drainage have been identified but their implementation in daily clinical practice is often suboptimal. We hypothesized that a nationwide program to enhance implementation of these best practices in pancreatic cancer care would improve survival and quality of life. METHODS/DESIGN: PACAP-1 is a nationwide multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled superiority trial. In a per-center stepwise and randomized manner, best practices in pancreatic cancer care regarding the use of (neo)adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, and metal biliary stents are implemented in all 17 Dutch pancreatic centers and their regional referral networks during a 6-week initiation period. Per pancreatic center, one multidisciplinary team functions as reference for the other centers in the network. Key best practices were identified from the literature, 3 years of data from existing nationwide registries within the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Project (PACAP), and national expert meetings. The best practices follow the Dutch guideline on pancreatic cancer and the current state of the literature, and can be executed within daily clinical practice. The implementation process includes monitoring, return visits, and provider feedback in combination with education and reminders. Patient outcomes and compliance are monitored within the PACAP registries. Primary outcome is 1-year overall survival (for all disease stages). Secondary outcomes include quality of life, 3- and 5-year overall survival, and guideline compliance. An improvement of 10% in 1-year overall survival is considered clinically relevant. A 25-month study duration was chosen, which provides 80% statistical power for a mortality reduction of 10.0% in the 17 pancreatic cancer centers, with a required sample size of 2142 patients, corresponding to a 6.6% mortality reduction and 4769 patients nationwide. DISCUSSION: The PACAP-1 trial is designed to evaluate whether a nationwide program for enhanced implementation of best practices in pancreatic cancer care can improve 1-year overall survival and quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03513705. Trial opened for accrual on 22th May 2018.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidad , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/terapia , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Biliar , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Análisis por Conglomerados , Drenaje , Terapia de Reemplazo Enzimático , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Cuidados Paliativos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiología , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Cooperación del Paciente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The number of patients diagnosed with cystic pancreatic neoplasms (CPN) has increased significantly during the last decade due to the widespread use of cross-sectional imaging. These CPN consist of a heterogeneous group of neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions with variable histopathological features, clinical presentation, and outcome. Until now we are not able to reliably identify all CPNs that require additional analysis, surgical resection or surveillance. Hence, physicians and surgeons are confronted with a difficult dilemma as they do not want to miss a diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma, but this often leads to the risk of over- or misuse of diagnostic examinations with a risk of complications and increased health care costs. Currently, four expert consensus guidelines on cystic lesions of the pancreas are available. Unfortunately, recommendations vary considerably between these guidelines. The purpose of this review therefore was to compare the different guidelines and elaborate upon the topics where these guidelines disagree.
Asunto(s)
Quiste Pancreático/diagnóstico , Quiste Pancreático/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Cistoadenoma Mucinoso/diagnóstico , Cistoadenoma Mucinoso/terapia , Cistadenoma Seroso/diagnóstico , Cistadenoma Seroso/terapia , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Uptake is an important determinant of the effectiveness of population-based screening. Uptake of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening generally remains sub-optimal. AIM: To determine factors influencing the decision whether to participate or not among individuals invited for faecal occult blood test (FOBT) or flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to a stratified random sample of individuals aged 50-74, previously invited for a randomised CRC screening trial offering FOBT or FS, and a reference group from the same population not previously invited (screening naïve group). The questionnaire assessed reasons for (non)-participation, individuals' characteristics associated with participation, knowledge, attitudes and level of informed choice. RESULTS: The response rate was 75% (n=341/452) for CRC screening participants, 21% (n=676/3212) for non-participants and 38% (n=192/500) for screening-naïve individuals. The main reasons for FOBT and FS participation were acquiring certainty about CRC presence and possible early CRC detection. Anticipated regret and positive attitudes towards CRC screening were strong predictors of actual participation and intention to participate in a next round. The main reason for non-participation in FOBT screening was lack of abdominal complaints. Non-participation in FS screening was additionally influenced by worries about burden. Eighty-one percent of participants and 12% of non-participants made an informed choice on participation. CONCLUSION: Only 12% of non-participants made an informed choice not to participate. These results imply that governments and/or organizations offering screening should focus on adequately informing and educating target populations about the harms and benefits of CRC screening. This may impact uptake of CRC screening.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Sangre Oculta , Sigmoidoscopía/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anciano , Conducta de Elección , Neoplasias Colorrectales/psicología , Toma de Decisiones , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/psicología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/psicología , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The population benefit of screening depends not only on the effectiveness of the test, but also on adherence, which, for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening remains low. An advance notification letter may increase adherence, however, no population-based randomized trials have been conducted to provide evidence of this. METHOD: In 2008, a representative sample of the Dutch population (aged 50-74 years) was randomized. All 2493 invitees in group A were sent an advance notification letter, followed two weeks later by a standard invitation. The 2507 invitees in group B only received the standard invitation. Non-respondents in both groups were sent a reminder 6 weeks after the invitation. RESULTS: The advance notification letters resulted in a significantly higher adherence (64.4% versus 61.1%, p-value 0.019). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed no significant interactions between group and age, sex, or socio-economic status. Cost analysis showed that the incremental cost per additional detected advanced neoplasia due to sending an advance notification letter was 957. CONCLUSION: This population-based randomized trial demonstrates that sending an advance notification letter significantly increases adherence by 3.3%. The incremental cost per additional detected advanced neoplasia is acceptable. We therefore recommend that such letters are incorporated within the standard CRC-screening invitation process.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistemas Recordatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Sistemas Recordatorios/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Perceived burden of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is an important determinant of participation in subsequent screening rounds and therefore crucial for the effectiveness of a screening programme. This study determined differences in perceived burden and willingness to return for a second screening round among participants of a randomised population-based trial comparing a guaiac-based faecal occult blood test (gFOBT), a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening. METHODS: A representative sample of the Dutch population (aged 50-74years) was randomised to be invited for gFOBT, FIT and FS screening. A random sample of participants of each group was asked to complete a questionnaire about test burden and willingness to return for CRC screening. RESULTS: In total 402/481 (84%) gFOBT, 530/659 (80%) FIT and 852/1124 (76%) FS screenees returned the questionnaire. The test was reported as burdensome by 2.5% of gFOBT, 1.4% of FIT and 12.9% of FS screenees (comparing gFOBT versus FIT p=0.05; versus FS p<0.001). In total 94.1% of gFOBT, 94.0% of FIT and 83.8% of FS screenees were willing to attend successive screening rounds (comparing gFOBT versus FIT p=0.84; versus FS p<0.001). Women reported more burden during FS screening than men (18.2% versus 7.7%; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FIT slightly outperforms gFOBT with a lower level of reported discomfort and overall burden. Both FOBTs are better accepted than FS screening. All three tests have a high level of acceptance, which may affect uptake of subsequent screening rounds and should be taken into consideration before implementing a CRC screening programme.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/psicología , Guayaco , Indicadores y Reactivos , Sangre Oculta , Satisfacción del Paciente , Anciano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/psicología , Costo de Enfermedad , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Pruebas Inmunológicas/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Dolor/etiología , Vergüenza , Sigmoidoscopía/métodos , Sigmoidoscopía/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Guidelines underline the role of individual preferences in the selection of a screening test, as insufficient evidence is available to recommend one screening test over another. We conducted a study to determine the preferences of individuals and to predict uptake for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes using various screening tests. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) questionnaire was distributed among naive subjects, yet to be screened, and previously screened subjects, aged 50-75 years. Subjects were asked to choose between scenarios on the basis of faecal occult blood test (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), total colonoscopy (TC) with various test-specific screening intervals and mortality reductions, and no screening (opt-out). RESULTS: In total, 489 out of 1498 (33%) screening-naïve subjects (52% male; mean age+/-s.d. 61+/-7 years) and 545 out of 769 (71%) previously screened subjects (52% male; mean age+/-s.d. 61+/-6 years) returned the questionnaire. The type of screening test, screening interval, and risk reduction of CRC-related mortality influenced subjects' preferences (all P<0.05). Screening-naive and previously screened subjects equally preferred 5-yearly FS and 10-yearly TC (P=0.24; P=0.11), but favoured both strategies to annual FOBT screening (all P-values <0.001) if, based on the literature, realistic risk reduction of CRC-related mortality was applied. Screening-naive and previously screened subjects were willing to undergo a 10-yearly TC instead of a 5-yearly FS to obtain an additional risk reduction of CRC-related mortality of 45% (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: These data provide insight into the extent by which interval and risk reduction of CRC-related mortality affect preferences for CRC screening tests. Assuming realistic test characteristics, subjects in the target population preferred endoscopic screening over FOBT screening, partly, due to the more favourable risk reduction of CRC-related mortality by endoscopy screening. Increasing the knowledge of potential screenees regarding risk reduction by different screening strategies is, therefore, warranted to prevent unrealistic expectations and to optimise informed choice.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Prioridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Algoritmos , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Carcinoma/mortalidad , Conducta de Elección/fisiología , Colonoscopía/psicología , Colonoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sangre Oculta , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Sigmoidoscopía/psicología , Sigmoidoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In many countries uptake of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening remains low. AIM: To assess how procedural characteristics of CRC screening programmes determine preferences for participation and how individuals weigh these against the perceived benefits from participation in CRC screening. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was conducted among subjects in the age group of 50-75 years, including both screening-naïve subjects and participants of a CRC screening programme. Subjects were asked on their preferences for aspects of CRC screening programmes using scenarios based on pain, risk of complications, screening location, preparation, duration of procedure, screening interval and risk reduction of CRC-related death. RESULTS: The response was 31% (156/500) for screening-naïve and 57% (124/210) for CRC screening participants. All aspects proved to significantly influence the respondents' preferences. For both groups combined, respondents required an additional relative risk reduction of CRC-related death by a screening programme of 1% for every additional 10 min of duration, 5% in order to expose themselves to a small risk of complications, 10% to accept mild pain, 10% to undergo preparation with an enema, 12% to use 0.75l of oral preparation combined with 12h fasting and 32% to use an extensive bowel preparation. Screening intervals shorter than 10 years were significantly preferred to a 10-year screening interval. CONCLUSION: This study shows that especially type of bowel preparation, risk reduction of CRC related death and length of screening interval influence CRC screening preferences. Furthermore, improving awareness on CRC mortality reduction by CRC screening may increase uptake.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Comportamiento del Consumidor , Tamizaje Masivo/psicología , Anciano , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Conducta de Elección , Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/efectos adversos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Dolor/etiología , Dolor/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Clase Social , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) is widely accepted, but there is no consensus on the preferred strategy. We conducted a randomised trial comparing participation and detection rates (DR) per screenee of guaiac-based faecal occult blood test (gFOBT), immunochemical FOBT (FIT), and flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) for CRC screening. METHODS: A representative sample of the Dutch population (n = 15 011), aged 50-74 years, was 1:1:1 randomised prior to invitation to one of the three screening strategies. Colonoscopy was indicated for screenees with a positive gFOBT or FIT, and for those in whom FS revealed a polyp with a diameter > or = 10 mm; adenoma with > or = 25% villous component or high grade dysplasia; serrated adenoma; > or = 3 adenomas; > or = 20 hyperplastic polyps; or CRC. RESULTS: The participation rate was 49.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 48.1 to 50.9%) for gFOBT, 61.5% (CI, 60.1 to 62.9%) for FIT and 32.4% (CI, 31.1 to 33.7%) for FS screening. gFOBT was positive in 2.8%, FIT in 4.8% and FS in 10.2%. The DR of advanced neoplasia was significantly higher in the FIT (2.4%; OR, 2.0; CI, 1.3 to 3.1) and the FS arm (8.0%; OR, 7.0; CI, 4.6 to 10.7) than the gFOBT arm (1.1%). FS demonstrated a higher diagnostic yield of advanced neoplasia per 100 invitees (2.4; CI, 2.0 to 2.8) than gFOBT (0.6; CI, 0.4 to 0.8) or FIT (1.5; CI, 1.2 to 1.9) screening. CONCLUSION: This randomised population-based CRC-screening trial demonstrated superior participation and detection rates for FIT compared to gFOBT screening. FIT screening should therefore be strongly preferred over gFOBT screening. FS screening demonstrated a higher diagnostic yield per 100 invitees than both FOBTs.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Sangre Oculta , Sigmoidoscopía/métodos , Adenoma/diagnóstico , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Guayaco , Humanos , Indicadores y Reactivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Participación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución por Sexo , Clase SocialRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of CT colonography (CTC) as a triage technique in faecal occult blood test (FOBT)-positive screening participants. METHODS: Consecutive guaiac (G-FOBT) and immunochemical (I-FOBT) FOBT-positive patients scheduled for colonoscopy underwent CTC with iodine tagging bowel preparation. Each CTC was read independently by two experienced observers. Per patient sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated based on double reading with different CTC cut-off lesion sizes using segmental unblinded colonoscopy as the reference standard. The acceptability of the technique to patients was evaluated with questionnaires. RESULTS: 302 FOBT-positive patients were included (54 G-FOBT and 248 I-FOBT). 22 FOBT-positive patients (7%) had a colorectal carcinoma and 211 (70%) had a lesion >or=6 mm. Participants considered colonoscopy more burdensome than CTC (p<0.05). Using a 6 mm CTC size cut-off, per patient sensitivity for CTC was 91% (95% CI 85% to 91%) and specificity was 69% (95% CI 60% to 89%) for the detection of colonoscopy lesions >or=6 mm. The PPV of CTC was 87% (95% CI 80% to 93%) and NPV 77% (95% CI 69% to 85%). Using CTC as a triage technique in 100 FOBT-positive patients would mean that colonoscopy could be prevented in 28 patients while missing >or=10 mm lesions in 2 patients. CONCLUSION: CTC with limited bowel preparation has reasonable predictive values in an FOBT-positive population and a higher acceptability to patients than colonoscopy. However, due to the high prevalence of clinically relevant lesions in FOBT-positive patients, CTC is unlikely to be an efficient triage technique in a first round FOBT population screening programme.
Asunto(s)
Adenoma/diagnóstico , Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Sangre Oculta , Adenoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Carcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Catárticos , Conducta de Elección , Pólipos del Colon/diagnóstico , Pólipos del Colon/diagnóstico por imagen , Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Lipoma/diagnóstico , Lipoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Grabación en VideoRESUMEN
Immunochemical faecal occult blood testing (FIT) provides quantitative test results, which allows optimisation of the cut-off value for follow-up colonoscopy. We conducted a randomised population-based trial to determine test characteristics of FIT (OC-Sensor micro, Eiken, Japan) screening at different cut-off levels and compare these with guaiac-based faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) screening in an average risk population. A representative sample of the Dutch population (n=10 011), aged 50-74 years, was 1 : 1 randomised before invitation to gFOBT and FIT screening. Colonoscopy was offered to screenees with a positive gFOBT or FIT (cut-off 50 ng haemoglobin/ml). When varying the cut-off level between 50 and 200 ng ml(-1), the positivity rate of FIT ranged between 8.1% (95% CI: 7.2-9.1%) and 3.5% (95% CI: 2.9-4.2%), the detection rate of advanced neoplasia ranged between 3.2% (95% CI: 2.6-3.9%) and 2.1% (95% CI: 1.6-2.6%), and the specificity ranged between 95.5% (95% CI: 94.5-96.3%) and 98.8% (95% CI: 98.4-99.0%). At a cut-off value of 75 ng ml(-1), the detection rate was two times higher than with gFOBT screening (gFOBT: 1.2%; FIT: 2.5%; P<0.001), whereas the number needed to scope (NNscope) to find one screenee with advanced neoplasia was similar (2.2 vs 1.9; P=0.69). Immunochemical faecal occult blood testing is considerably more effective than gFOBT screening within the range of tested cut-off values. From our experience, a cut-off value of 75 ng ml(-1) provided an adequate positivity rate and an acceptable trade-off between detection rate and NNscope.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Guayaco , Sangre Oculta , Anciano , Colonoscopía , Femenino , Hemoglobinas/análisis , Humanos , Inmunoquímica , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Low birth weight and postnatal catch-up growth have been associated with an increased risk for diabetes mellitus type II (DMII). We evaluated the contribution of birth and adult size, body composition, and waist-to-hip ratio to DMII risk factors in young adulthood. METHODS: In a group of 136 young adults, aged 18-24 yr, insulin sensitivity and disposition index were determined by frequent sampling iv glucose tolerance test. The association of clinical parameters with these variables was analyzed with multiple regression modeling. In addition, differences in insulin sensitivity and disposition index, a measure for beta-cell function, were analyzed in four subgroups, young adults either born small for gestational age SGA with short stature (n = 25) or SGA with catch-up growth (n = 23) or born appropriate for gestational age with idiopathic short stature (n = 23) or with normal stature (controls) (n = 26). RESULTS: Fat mass was the only significant predictor of insulin sensitivity, whereas birth length and birth weight were not significant. After correction for age, gender, and adult body size, insulin sensitivity was significantly lower in subjects born SGA with catch-up growth compared with controls. None of the variables had a significant influence on disposition index, and there was no significant difference in disposition index between the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that a higher body fat mass at 21 yr is associated with reduced insulin sensitivity, independent of birth size. These findings have important implications for public health practice.