REpeated AutoLogous Infusions of STem cells In Cirrhosis (REALISTIC): a multicentre, phase II, open-label, randomised controlled trial of repeated autologous infusions of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) mobilised CD133+ bone marrow stem cells in patients with cirrhosis. A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Liver disease mortality and morbidity are rapidly rising and liver transplantation is limited by organ availability. Small scale human studies have shown that stem cell therapy is safe and feasible and has suggested clinical benefit. No published studies have yet examined the effect of stem cell therapy in a randomised controlled trial and evaluated the effect of repeated therapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients with liver cirrhosis will be randomised to one of three trial groups: group 1: Control group, Standard conservative management; group 2 treatment: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; lenograstim) 15 µg/kg body weight daily on days 1-5; group 3 treatment: G-CSF 15 µg/kg body weight daily on days 1-5 followed by leukapheresis, isolation and aliquoting of CD133+ cells. Patients will receive an infusion of freshly isolated CD133+ cells immediately and frozen doses at days 30 and 60 via peripheral vein (0.2×10(6) cells/kg for each of the three doses). Primary objective is to demonstrate an improvement in the severity of liver disease over 3 months using either G-CSF alone or G-CSF followed by repeated infusions of haematopoietic stem cells compared with standard conservative management. The trial is powered to answer two hypotheses of each treatment compared to control but not powered to detect smaller expected differences between the two treatment groups. As such, the overall α=0.05 for the trial is split equally between the two hypotheses. Conventionally, to detect a relevant standardised effect size of 0.8 point reduction in Model for End-stage Liver Disease score using two-sided α=0.05(overall α=0.1 split equally between the two hypotheses) and 80% power requires 27 participants to be randomised per group (81 participants in total). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial is registered at Current Controlled Trials on 18 November 2009 (ISRCTN number 91288089, EuDRACT number 2009-010335-41). The findings of this trial will be disseminated to patients and through peer-reviewed publications and international presentations.

Cryopreservation of allogeneic PBSC from related and unrelated donors is associated with delayed platelet engraftment but has no impact on survival.

Cryopreservation of PBSC for allo-SCT offers potential advantages; however, its impact on engraftment and outcomes remains unclear. A total of 76 allo-SCT performed using cryopreserved PBSC from HLA identical related (n=57) and unrelated donors (n=19) were compared with 123 fresh PBSC allo-SCT. Median neutrophil engraftment was on day 12 for both cryopreserved and fresh PBSC; in multivariate analysis, there was a slight but significant delay in neutrophil engraftment after the median date (hazard ratio (HR)=1.44, P=0.003). Platelet engraftment was significantly delayed in cryopreserved PBSC recipients (median time 19 vs 14 days). In multivariate analysis cryopreservation (HR=1.85, P<0.001), earlier date of transplant and lower CD34+ cell dose were associated with delayed platelet engraftment. Two-year OS and relapse and 1-year TRM rates did not differ significantly. Acute GVHD incidence was comparable, and extensive chronic GVHD at 1 year was higher in cryopreserved PBSC recipients (40.3 vs. 28.3%), but not significantly so (P=0.13). Cryopreservation of related and unrelated donor allogeneic PBSC is safe and effective where its benefits outweigh the risks of delayed platelet engraftment; its impact on chronic GVHD incidence requires further assessment.

An internal positive control for the enumeration of CD45(+) and CD34(+) cells by flow cytometry allows monitoring of reagent and operator performance.

BACKGROUND: Three-color flow cytometry assays are used to determine CD34(+) cell doses prior to stem cell transplantation. These assays require high-quality reagents that are dispensed accurately to ensure reproducible results. We have developed a flow cytometry assay for CD34(+) cells with an integral positive control (KG1a cells) for monitoring reagent and operator performance. METHODS: The method was validated using samples from 127 allogeneic donations (42 BM, 85 PBSC) from healthy donors and 195 autologous donations (46 BM, 149 PBSC) from patients in remission from hematologic malignancies. The mean, SD and range of CD45(+) and CD34(+)cell counts were determined for each donation type. An internal control was used to assess performance of reagents and operators by comparison with a predetermined target value and an experienced operator. RESULTS: Replicate studies showed the method to be accurate and precise, with KG1a cells at 97.7+/-3.9% of the target value and a CV of 4.0%. In routine use over 322 samples, the accuracy was 91.7+/-17.7% of the target value, with a CV of 19.3%. Investigations into the cause of the reduced precision showed that reagents performed consistently well but operator performance was variable, with two of six operators significantly under-dispensing KG1a cells. DISCUSSION: This study validates our three-color flow cytometry assay and demonstrates that KG1a cells may be used to monitor test performance in the routine working environment. In addition to monitoring performance within a single laboratory, its wider use in multicenter studies may be helpful regarding standardization of methods.