Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39033782

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between timing of indwelling catheter removal and urinary retention after cesarean. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Eight hospitals in suburban, rural, and urban Colorado and Montana. PARTICIPANTS: Women who gave birth by cesarean from January 1, 2021, to April 30, 2022 (N = 3,496). METHODS: We categorized participants who gave birth between January 1, 2021, and June 29, 2021, (before implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery initiative) into Group A and participants who gave birth between July 1, 2021, and April 30, 2022, (after implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery initiative) into Group B. We used descriptive statistics to report the proportion of participants in both groups who experienced urinary retention after birth. We performed chi-square tests to determine the association between the time of catheter removal and incidence of urinary retention. We used the Wilcoxon rank sum test to determine the association between length of stay and urinary retention. RESULTS: Urinary retention rates were 5.8% in Group A and 12.6% in Group B (p < .001). In both groups, participants who received epidural anesthesia experienced significantly more urinary retention than those who received spinal anesthesia (p < .001). Participants who received epidural anesthesia and experienced urinary retention pushed 16.9% longer than those without urinary retention (p < .001). The proportion of participants who experienced urinary retention after catheter removal was 19.4% at 7 hours, 4.6% at 16 hours, and 9.9% at 12 hours after birth. Length of stay was determined to be inconclusive. CONCLUSION: We determined that the optimal time of catheter removal to minimize the rate of urinary retention was 12 to 16 hours after cesarean among women who received morphine sulfate as the spinal anesthesia.

2.
Nurs Womens Health ; 26(1): 30-37, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35032465

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare levels of postoperative oxycodone use and incisional pain between two randomized groups-an intervention and a control. DESIGN: Mixed-methods design; quantitative data achieved via a randomized controlled trial, with qualitative data collected on binder use. The primary variable was oxycodone (in milligrams) required during the first 48 hours after birth, and the secondary variable was incisional pain levels measured on Postoperative Days 1 and 2. SETTING: Acute-care community hospital in Wheat Ridge, Colorado, and an acute care urban hospital in Denver, Colorado. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 220 individuals in the postpartum period after having cesarean birth. INTERVENTIONS/MEASUREMENTS: Participants were randomized to the intervention group (binder) or the control group (no binder). Data were collected on opioid usage for the first 48 hours. Participants in both groups were asked to rate their incisional pain on Postoperative Day 1 (24 hours after birth) and Postoperative Day 2 (48 hours after birth). Participants in the binder group were also asked to provide feedback on their experience wearing the binder. RESULTS: A total of 196 participants completed the study. The overall amount of oxycodone taken by individuals in the binder group was lower than that in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = .10). Pain scores in the binder group were significantly lower on Day 2 compared with the control group (p = .002). The majority of individuals in the binder group provided positive feedback about their experience wearing the binder. CONCLUSION: Individuals routinely receive medications to assist with pain management postoperatively. Because of growing concerns related to the nation's opioid addiction crisis, there is interest in using multimodal treatments to achieve adequate pain control for individuals postoperatively. Abdominal binders are a low-cost intervention to assist with pain management and, given the results of this study, seem like a reasonable option to consider.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/prevención & control , Manejo del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Embarazo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...