RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many Japanese patients with hepatic disorders confirmed on diagnostic imaging and coexisting upper gastrointestinal (GI) peptic lesions receive treatment with proton pump inhibitors. Some pharmacotherapies used to treat peptic ulcers have been associated with adverse drug reactions (ADRs), including elevated liver enzyme levels. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the tolerability and effectiveness of rabeprazole sodium in treating peptic lesions in patients with coexisting hepatic disorders. METHODS: This open-label, practice-based, postmarketing surveillance investigation was conducted at 15 centers across Japan. Male and female patients aged ≥18 years with peptic lesions confirmed on upper GI endoscopy and with underlying hepatic disease were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to receive rabeprazole 10 or 20 mg PO (tablet) QD after a meal for up to 8 weeks. Tolerability was assessed using monitoring of the incidence of ADRs determined by direct patient questioning, spontaneous reporting, and laboratory assessment. All patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug were included in the tolerability assessment. Effectiveness was assessed at baseline and study end using the rates of achievement of improvement on endoscopy, relief of subjective/objective symptoms (rates of improvement in epigastric pain and heartburn), and global improvement. The effectiveness analysis included all patients with complete data before and after treatment. Subanalyses were conducted to determine the effectiveness of drug by identification of the proportion of patients with coexisting hepatic disorders (cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis, and other hepatic diseases [eg, alcoholic hepatitis, fatty liver]) and by peptic lesion (gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, stomal ulcer, and reflux esophagitis) who achieved improvement. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients were enrolled; 108 patients were included in the tolerability analysis (81 men, 27 women; mean age, 59.9 years; 10-mg dose, 90 patients; 20-mg dose, 18 patients) and 98 patients were included in the analysis of effectiveness. Twenty-one ADRs occurred in 11 (10.2%) patients. Serious ADRs occurred in 2 patients (elevated bilirubin level and hepatic encephalopathy, 1 patient each). Administration of rabeprazole was discontinued in 5 patients due to the occurrence of the following ADRs: constipation (1 patient); epigastric pain (1); dyslalia, disorientation, tremor, sleep disorder, and hepatic encephalopathy (1); diarrhea (1); and elevated alkaline phosphatase and y-glutamyl transpeptidase levels (1). On endoscopy, the proportion of patients achieving improvement with either dose was 30/33 (90.9%). The relief rates assessed using subjective symptoms were 47/55 (85.5%) and 47/56 (83.9%) for epigastric pain and heartburn, respectively. The proportion of patients achieving global improvement with either dose was 80/98 (81.6%) patients (49/62 [79.0%] for cirrhosis, 11/16 [68.8%] for chronic hepatitis, and 20/20 [100.0%] for other hepatic diseases [alcoholic hepatitis, fatty liver]). CONCLUSION: In this study in Japanese patients with hepatic disorders, rabeprazole was well tolerated and appeared effective for the treatment of upper GI peptic lesions.
RESUMEN
There is limited information on the molecular changes involved in the pathogenesis of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). The Fragile Histidine Triad (FHIT) gene, encompassing the FRA3B fragile site at chromosome 3p14.2, is a candidate tumor suppressor gene in a variety of human malignancies. Recent studies have suggested that Fhit inactivation can be a consequence of defects in mismatch repair proteins. We analyzed Fhit and Mlh1 protein expressions using immunohistochemical methods in 20 GBCs and three gallbladder adenomas (GBAs) to elucidate the role of Fhit protein in gallbladder carcinogenesis. In addition, we examined whether Fhit and Mlh1 protein expressions correlated with P53 expression and clinicopathological findings. Significant loss or reduction in Fhit expression was noted in nine (45%) of the GBCs and one of the GBAs. Loss of Mlh1 protein expression was detected in six (30%) of the GBCs and one of the GBAs. Reduced Fhit expression was significantly associated with the absence of Mlh1 protein expression in the GBCs and the GBAs (p=0.0186). P53 overexpression was present in 11 (55%) of the GBCs, but none of the GBAs. Fhit and Mlh1 protein expressions were not significantly associated with P53 expression and clinicopathological findings. These results suggested that reduced Fhit expression might be involved in the development of GBC and be correlated with Mlh1 expression.