Intra-articular implantation of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells to treat knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1/2 clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The intra-articular implantation of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) as a treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA) is an emerging new therapy. In this study, patients with knee OA received intra-articular implantations of autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs. We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of this implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a phase 1/2 single-center, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a placebo control. The subjects consisted of patients with knee OA randomly assigned to either an intra-articular implantation of MSCs (40 × 106 cells) or 5 mL normal saline (placebo). Patients were followed up for 6 months after the implantations. The pain level and function improvements for patient-reported outcomes were assessed based on a visual analog scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and its subscales, walking distance, painless walking distance, standing time and knee flexion compared with the placebo group at 3 and 6 months following the implantations. RESULTS: Overall, 43 patients (Kellgren-Lawrence grades 2, 3 and 4) were assigned to either the MSCs (n = 19) or placebo (n = 24) group. Patients who received MSCs experienced significantly greater improvements in WOMAC total score, WOMAC pain and physical function subscales and painless walking distance compared with patients who received placebo. There were no major adverse events attributed to the MSC therapy. CONCLUSION: This randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled RCT demonstrated the safety and efficacy of a single intra-articular implantation of 40 × 106 autologous MSCs in patients with knee OA. Intra-articular implantation of MSCs provided significant and clinically relevant pain relief over 6 months versus placebo and could be considered a promising novel treatment for knee OA. We propose that further investigations should be conducted over an extended assessment period and with a larger cohort.

Intra-articular knee implantation of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in rheumatoid arthritis patients with knee involvement: Results of a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1/2 clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we intend to assess the safety and tolerability of intra-articular knee implantation of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to determine the preliminary clinical efficacy data in this population. The trial registration numbers are as follows: Royan Institute Ethics Committee: AC/91/1133; NCT01873625. METHODS: This single-center, randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1/2 clinical trial randomized RA patients with knee involvement to receive either an intra-articular knee implantation of 40 million autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs per joint or normal saline (placebo). Patients were followed up for 12 months to assess therapy outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients, 15 in the MSC group and 15 in the placebo group, enrolled in this study. There were no adverse effects reported after MSC administration or during follow-up. Patients who received MSCs had superior findings according to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analogue scale (VAS), time to jelling and pain-free walking distance. However, this improvement could not be significantly sustained beyond 12 months. The MSC group exhibited improved standing time (P = 0.01). In addition, the MSCs appeared to contribute to reductions in methotrexate and prednisolone use. CONCLUSION: Intra-articular knee implantation of MSCs appeared to be safe and well tolerated. In addition, we observed a trend toward clinical efficacy. These results, in our opinion, have justified the need for further investigations over an extended assessment period with larger numbers of RA patients who have knee involvement.

Safety and Efficacy of Repeated Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cell Therapy in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia in a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Critical limb ischemia is a manifestation of peripheral arterial disease characterized by insufficient arterial blood flow for maintaining tissue viability in the lower extremities. Therapeutic angiogenesis is used for peripheral arterial disease patients who are not candidates for surgical revascularization or radiological intervention. There is accumulating evidence for the beneficial impact of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell transplantation for treatment of critical limb ischemia in humans. This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of repeated bone marrow mononuclear cell injections in comparison with a single bone marrow mononuclear cell injection in critical limb ischemia patients. METHODS: Patients with critical limb ischemia (n = 22) were randomized (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2 show/NCT01480414) to receive either a single (n = 11) or four (n = 11) intramuscular injections of bone marrow mononuclear cells as a cell therapy product. RESULTS: There were no reported adverse events during the 24-week follow-up period after cell delivery. Efficacy assessment indicated that after cell injections, there was significant improvement in Ankle-Brachial Index, Visual Analog Scale, pain-free walking distance, and Wagner stage as well as reduction in ulcer size. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of clinical parameters. However, by the 24th week the pain-free walking distance improved significantly in the group who received four injections of cells. CONCLUSION: Favorable clinical outcomes strongly indicate the long-term benefit of bone marrow mononuclear cell transplantation, either as one or several injections, for retrieval from critical limb ischemia. Repeated cell injections have shown increased improvement of pain-free walking distance in patients. These findings warrant further exploration in later-phase clinical trials with repeated injections.

Long-Term Follow-up of Intra-articular Injection of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients with Knee, Ankle, or Hip Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating disease that typically affects a large number of the middle-aged and elderly population. Current treatment strategies have had limited success in these patients. This study aims to investigate the safety of treatment with autologous bone marrow (BM)-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) transplanted in patients with OA of the knee, ankle, or hip. METHODS: We enrolled 18 patients with different joint involvements (knee, ankle, or hip OA) and one was lost to follow-up. BM samples were taken from the patients, after which BM-derived MSCs were isolated and cultured. Each patient received one MSC injection. Patients were followed with clinical examinations, MRI and laboratory tests at 2, 6, 12, and 30 months post-transplantation. RESULTS: We observed no severe adverse events such as pulmonary embolism, death, or systemic complications. A limited number of patients had very minor localized adverse effects such as rash and erythema. There were no changes in liver function, hematology, or biochemistry analyses before and after cell therapy. There was no evidence of tumor or neoplastic changes in the patients during the 30-month follow-up period. All patients exhibited therapeutic benefits such as increased walking distance, decreased visual analog scale (VAS), and total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC) scores which were confirmed by MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has shown that injection of MSCs in different OA affected joints is safe and therapeutically beneficial. However, further studies are needed with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods to confirm these findings.

Intrathecal injection of CD133-positive enriched bone marrow progenitor cells in children with cerebral palsy: feasibility and safety.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Recent studies have proposed that cellular transplantation may have some regenerative and functional efficacy in the treatment of cerebral palsy (CP); however, much remains to be understood regarding its safety, feasibility and efficacy. This study was initiated to evaluate the safety of autologous bone marrow-derived CD133(+) cell intrathecal injection. METHODS: Children (n = 12), aged 4 to 12 years, who were diagnosed with different types of CP underwent BM aspiration. CD133(+) cells were enriched from the BM samples and intrathecally injected. The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66), Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), UK FIM+FAM, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and Functional Assessment Measure (FAM) were assessed at baseline and 6 months after the procedure. Patients' ability to balance was measured by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and severity of spasticity was evaluated by the Modified Ashworth Scale. Magnetic resonance imaging was done at baseline and 6 months after therapy. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01404663). RESULTS: There were no adverse events detected by clinical and laboratory tests or imaging studies, with the exception of a seizure in 1 patient. A significant improvement was observed 6 months after cell transplantation versus baseline according to GMFM, GMFCS, FIM+FAM, Ashworth Scale, and BBS outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Subarachnoid injection of CD133-positive enriched bone marrow progenitor cells in children with CP is a safe approach. The results suggest a possible short-term improvement in neurological function.