Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1382417, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38966640

RESUMEN

Background: The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) has become an important predictive tool for assessing patients' nutritional status and immune competence. It is widely used in prognostic evaluations for various cancer patients. However, the prognostic relevance of the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients (GC/GEJC) undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the prognostic impact of PNI in this specific patient cohort. Methods: We conducted a thorough literature search, covering prominent databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SpringerLink, and the Cochrane Library. The search spanned from the inception of these databases up to December 5, 2023. Employing the 95% confidence interval and Hazard Ratio (HR), the study systematically evaluated the relationship between PNI and key prognostic indicators, including the objective remission rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in GC/GEJC patients undergoing ICI treatment. Results: Eight studies comprising 813 eligible patients were selected. With 7 studies consistently demonstrating superior Overall Survival (OS) in the high-Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) group compared to their low-PNI counterparts (HR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.47-0.71, P<0.001). Furthermore, the results derived from 6 studies pointed out that the significant correlation between he low-PNI and poorer progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.47-0.71, P<0.001). Subgroup analyses were performed to validate the robustness of the results. In addition, we conducted a meta-analysis of three studies examining the correlation between PNI and objective response rate/disease control rate (ORR/DCR) and found that the ORR/DCR was significantly superior in the high PNI group (ORR: RR: 1.24, P=0.002; DCR: RR: 1.43, P=0.008). Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates that the low-PNI in GC/GEJC patients undergoing ICI treatment is significantly linked to worse OS and PFS. Therefore, PNI can serve as a prognostic indicator of post-treatment outcomes in patients with GC receiving ICIs. Further prospective studies are required to assess the reliability of these findings. Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/, identifier INPLASY202450133.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Unión Esofagogástrica , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/inmunología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Unión Esofagogástrica/patología , Pronóstico , Evaluación Nutricional , Estado Nutricional
2.
Front Oncol ; 14: 1367990, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38912061

RESUMEN

Objectives: The prognostic relevance of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in gastric cancer (GC) patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the prognostic impact of PLR in this specific patient cohort. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and EMBASE databases, including literature published up to September 2023, to investigate the prognostic implications of PLR in patients with gastric cancer undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Outcome measures encompassed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rates (DCR). Results: Nine studies from seven articles comprising 948 eligible patients were selected. The results revealed a significant correlation between elevated PLR and poorer OS and progression-free survival (PFS) (OS: HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.39-2.00, p < 0.001; PFS: HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.29-1.76, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses were performed to validate the robustness of the results. Moreover, a meta-analysis of four studies investigating the correlation between the PLR in gastric cancer (GC) patients and the objective response rate/disease control rate (ORR/DCR), showed no significant association between the PLR and ORR/DCR (ORR: RR = 1.01, p = 0.960; DCR: RR = 0.96, p = 0.319). Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicates that elevated PLR in GC patients undergoing ICI treatment is significantly linked to worse OS and PFS. Therefore, PLR can serve as a prognostic indicator of post-treatment outcomes in patients with GC receiving ICIs. Further prospective studies are required to assess the reliability of these findings. Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/, identifier INPLASY2023120103.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA