Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Rheumatol ; 29(5): 465-72, 2010 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20033244

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Preference for a drug formulation is important in adherence to long-term medication for chronic illnesses such as osteoporosis. We investigated the preference for and acceptability of chewable tablet containing calcium and vitamin D (Calci Chew D(3), Nycomed) compared to that of a sachet containing calcium and vitamin D(3) (Cad, Will-Pharma). This open, randomised, cross-over trial was set up to compare the preference and acceptability of two calcium plus vitamin D(3) formulations (both with 500 mg calcium and 400/440 IU vitamin D3), given twice a day in patients with osteoporosis. Preference and acceptability were assessed by means of questionnaires. Preference was determined by asking the question, which treatment the patient preferred, and acceptability was measured by scoring five variables, using rating scales. Of the 102 patients indicating a preference for a trial medication, 67% preferred the chewable tablet, 19% the sachet with calcium and vitamin D(3,) and 15% stated no preference. The significant preference for Calci Chew D(3) (p < 0.0001) was associated with higher scores for all five acceptability variables. The two formulations were tolerated equally well. A significant greater number of patients considered the chewable tablet as preferable and acceptable to the sachet, containing calcium and vitamin D(3). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN18822358.


Asunto(s)
Colecalciferol/uso terapéutico , Suplementos Dietéticos , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Calcio/metabolismo , Colecalciferol/efectos adversos , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Prioridad del Paciente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 43(2): 140-6, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18797408

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Maintenance use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is often complicated by gastropathy. In non-NSAID users, eradication of Helicobacter pylori is associated with decreased mucosal inflammation, and may halt the progression to atrophy and intestinal metaplasia, but the continuous use of NSAIDs may interfere with these processes. GOAL: To investigate the effect of H. pylori eradication on gastric mucosal histology during long-term NSAID use, with and without gastroprotective therapy. STUDY: Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were on long-term NSAIDs and were H. pylori-positive on serologic testing. Patients were randomly assigned to either eradication or placebo. Gastritis was assessed according to the updated Sydney classification for activity, chronic inflammation, gastric glandular atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and H. pylori density. RESULTS: Biopsy specimens were available for histology of 305 patients. Of these, 48% were on chronic gastroprotective medication. Significant less active gastritis, inflammation, and H. pylori density was found in the eradication group compared with the placebo group in both corpus and antrum (P<0.001). In the corpus, less atrophy was found in the eradication group compared with the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication in patients on long-term NSAID therapy leads to healing of gastritis despite ongoing NSAID therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Anciano , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Antiulcerosos/uso terapéutico , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Mucosa Gástrica/microbiología , Mucosa Gástrica/patología , Gastritis/microbiología , Gastritis/patología , Gastritis/fisiopatología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Humanos , Masculino , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Omeprazol/uso terapéutico , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Helicobacter ; 12(5): 477-85, 2007 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17760715

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the major causes of gastroduodenal ulcers. Studies on the benefit of eradication of H. pylori in NSAID users yielded conflicting results. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether H. pylori eradication in patients on long-term NSAIDs reduces the incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers. METHODS: Patients on long-term NSAID treatment and who are H. pylori positive on serologic testing, were randomly assigned to either H. pylori eradication (omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin) or placebo. Primary endpoint was the presence of endoscopic gastric or duodenal ulcers 3 months after randomization. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-five (48%) of a total of 347 patients were on gastroprotective medication. At endoscopy, gastroduodenal ulcers were diagnosed in 6 (4%) and 8 (5%) patients in the eradication and placebo group, respectively (p = .65). During follow-up of 12 months, no symptomatic ulcers or ulcer complications developed. No significant differences were found in the development of gastroduodenal erosions, dyspepsia, or in quality of life. CONCLUSION: H. pylori eradication therapy in patients on long-term NSAID treatment had no beneficial effect on the occurrence of ulcers, erosions, or dyspepsia. Ulcer rates in both study arms are remarkably low, in both patients with and without gastroprotective therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Úlcera Péptica/epidemiología , Anciano , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Antiulcerosos/uso terapéutico , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Infecciones por Helicobacter/complicaciones , Infecciones por Helicobacter/epidemiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Omeprazol/uso terapéutico , Úlcera Péptica/complicaciones , Úlcera Péptica/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Med Teach ; 23(2): 138-144, 2001 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11371289

RESUMEN

To know what is going on in physicians' surgery hours, assessment of practice performance is important with regard to quality assessment activities. The incognito standardized patient (SP) method is a powerful method to assess this. However, until now no reports have been published about specialists' performance using this method. In this study, 27 rheumatologists in 16 hospitals were each visited by eight incognito SPs to study the feasibility of sending incognito SPs to specialists working in different hospitals, of follow-up consultations and of simulating additional investigations. SPs recorded performance on case-specific checklists. The different steps needed for these visits are described in detail. A total of 136 first and 32 follow-up visits took place. SPs remained undetected in 98% of the visits. It is concluded that this SP method is a feasible one, however, only to be used for very specific purposes. Use of incognito SPs for larger scale projects is not recommended.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA