Artificial intelligence for gastric cancer in endoscopy: From diagnostic reasoning to market.

Recognition of gastric conditions during endoscopy exams, including gastric cancer, usually requires specialized training and a long learning curve. Besides that, the interobserver variability is frequently high due to the different morphological characteristics of the lesions and grades of mucosal inflammation. In this sense, artificial intelligence tools based on deep learning models have been developed to support physicians to detect, classify, and predict gastric lesions more efficiently. Even though a growing number of studies exists in the literature, there are multiple challenges to bring a model to practice in this field, such as the need for more robust validation studies and regulatory hurdles. Therefore, the aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the current use of artificial intelligence applied to endoscopic imaging to evaluate gastric precancerous and cancerous lesions and the barriers to widespread implementation of this technology in clinical routine.

Addressing bias in preterm birth research: The role of advanced imputation techniques for missing race and ethnicity in perinatal health data.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding (BISG) and Bayesian Improved First Name Surname Geocoding (BIFSG) in estimating race and ethnicity, and how they influence odds ratios for preterm birth. METHODS: We analyzed hospital birth admission electronic health records (EHR) data (N = 9985). We created two simulation sets with 40 % of race and ethnicity data missing randomly or more likely for non-Hispanic black birthing people who had preterm birth. We calculated C-statistics to evaluate how accurately BISG and BIFSG estimate race and ethnicity. We examined the association between race and ethnicity and preterm birth using logistic regression and reported odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: BISG and BIFSG showed high accuracy for most racial and ethnic categories (C-statistics = 0.94-0.97, 95 % confidence intervals [CI] = 0.92-0.97). When race and ethnicity were not missing at random, BISG (OR = 1.25, CI = 0.97-1.62) and BIFSG (OR = 1.38, CI = 1.08-1.76) resulted in positive estimates mirroring the true association (OR = 1.68, CI = 1.34-2.09) for Non-Hispanic Black birthing people, while traditional methods showed contrasting estimates (Complete case OR = 0.62, CI = 0.41-0.94; multiple imputation OR = 0.63, CI = 0.40-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: BISG and BIFSG accurately estimate missing race and ethnicity in perinatal EHR data, decreasing bias in preterm birth research, and are recommended over traditional methods to reduce potential bias.