Comparación de distintas herramientas para la evaluación de la malnutrición y la sarcopenia en pacientes con cirrosis hepática / Comparison of different tools for the evaluation of malnutrition and sarcopenia in patients with liver cirrhosis

Introducción: la malnutrición y la sarcopenia son frecuentes en la población con cirrosis hepática y generan un impacto negativo en el estado funcional y la esperanza de vida de estos pacientes. Existen múltiples herramientas para la valoración de la malnutrición y la sarcopenia en los pacientes con cirrosis hepática. Objetivo: valorar la malnutrición y la sarcopenia en la cirrosis hepática y comparar distintas herramientas diagnósticas aplicables en esta población. Método: se realizó un estudio analítico de corte transversal con muestreo a conveniencia mediante inclusión continua de pacientes con cirrosis hepática en un hospital de tercer nivel durante diciembre de 2018 a mayo de 2019. Se realizó la valoración nutricional con la antropometría del brazo, el índice de masa corporal (IMC) y el algoritmo del Royal Free Hospital Subjetive Global Assessment (RFH-SGA). Para la valoración de la sarcopenia se aplicó la fuerza de agarre de la mano con un dinamómetro. Los resultados se reportaron en medidas de tendencia central expresadas en frecuencia y porcentaje. (AU)

Introduction: malnutrition and sarcopenia are frequent in the population with liver cirrhosis and have a negative impact on the performance status and life expectancy of these patients. There are multiple assessment tools for malnutrition and sarcopenia in cirrhosis. Some of these tools are reproducible and easy to apply, which facilitates their global application for screening malnutrition and sarcopenia. Objective: to assess malnutrition and sarcopenia in liver cirrhosis and to compare the accuracy of diagnostic tools in this population. Method: a cross-sectional analytical study was conducted with convenience sampling by using continuous inclusion of patients with liver cirrhosis in a tertiary care center during December 2018 to May 2019. The nutritional assessment was carried out with arm anthropometry, body mass index (BMI), and the algorithm of the Royal Free Hospital Subjective Global Assessment (RFH-SGA). For the evaluation of sarcopenia, the hand grip strength test with a hand dynamometer was applied. The results were reported in measures of central tendency expressed in frequency and percentage. A Kendall’s Tau-b rank correlation coefficient was performed with non-parametric variables, considering a p < 0.05 as a statistically significant value. (AU)

Multinational prospective cohort study of incidence and risk factors for central line-associated bloodstream infections in ICUs of 8 Latin American countries.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to identify central line (CL)-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) rates and risk factors in Latin-America. METHODS: From January 1, 2014 to February 10, 2022, we conducted a multinational multicenter prospective cohort study in 58 ICUs of 34 hospitals in 21 cities in 8 Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Mexico, Panama). We applied multiple-logistic regression. Outcomes are shown as adjusted-odds ratios (aOR). RESULTS: About 29,385 patients were hospitalized during 92,956 days, acquired 400 CLABSIs, and pooled CLABSI rate was 4.30 CLABSIs per 1,000 CL-days. We analyzed following 10 variables: Gender, age, length of stay (LOS) before CLABSI acquisition, CL-days before CLABSI acquisition, CL-device utilization (DU) ratio, CL-type, tracheostomy use, hospitalization type, intensive care unit (ICU) type, and facility ownership, Following variables were independently associated with CLABSI: LOS before CLABSI acquisition, rising risk 3% daily (aOR=1.03;95%CI=1.02-1.04; P < .0001); number of CL-days before CLABSI acquisition, rising risk 4% per CL-day (aOR=1.04;95%CI=1.03-1.05; P < .0001); publicly-owned facility (aOR=2.33;95%CI=1.79-3.02; P < .0001). ICU with highest risk was medical-surgical (aOR=2.61;95%CI=1.41-4.81; P < .0001). CL with the highest risk were femoral (aOR=2.71;95%CI=1.61-4.55; P < .0001), and internal-jugular (aOR=2.62;95%CI=1.82-3.79; P < .0001). PICC (aOR=1.25;95%CI=0.63-2.51; P = .52) was not associated with CLABSI risk. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings it is suggested to focus on reducing LOS, CL-days, using PICC instead of femoral or internal-jugular; and implementing evidence-based CLABSI prevention recommendations.

[Comparison of different tools for the evaluation of malnutrition and sarcopenia in patients with liver cirrhosis]. / Comparación de distintas herramientas para la evaluación de la malnutrición y la sarcopenia en pacientes con cirrosis hepática.

Introduction: Introduction: malnutrition and sarcopenia are frequent in the population with liver cirrhosis and have a negative impact on the performance status and life expectancy of these patients. There are multiple assessment tools for malnutrition and sarcopenia in cirrhosis. Objective: to assess malnutrition and sarcopenia in liver cirrhosis and to compare the accuracy of diagnostic tools in this population. Method: a cross-sectional analytical study was conducted with convenience sampling by using continuous inclusion of patients with liver cirrhosis in a tertiary care center during December 2018 to May 2019. The nutritional assessment was carried out with arm anthropometry, body mass index (BMI), and the algorithm of the Royal Free Hospital Subjective Global Assessment (RFH-SGA). For the evaluation of sarcopenia, the hand grip strength test with a hand dynamometer was applied. The results were reported in measures of central tendency expressed in frequency and percentage. Results: a total of 103 patients were included with a predominance of the male gender (79.6 %) and a mean age of 51 years (± 10). The etiology of liver cirrhosis corresponded more frequently to alcohol consumption (68 %) and most of the patients were Child-Pugh C (57.3 %) with a mean MELD of 21.9 (± 8.9). A mean BMI with dry weight of 25.2 kg/m2 was reported, and with respect to the WHO classification by BMI, 7.8 % were underweight and 59.2 % were malnourished by RFH-SGA. Sarcopenia was present in 88.3 % using the hand grip strength test, for which a mean of 18.99 kg was found. A Kendall's Tau-b rank correlation coefficient was performed between BMI and RFH-SGA, which showed no statistically significant association, as well as between mean arm muscle circumference percentiles and hand grip strength. Conclusions: global assessment in liver cirrhosis should include screening for malnutrition and sarcopenia, for which validated, accessible and safe application tools should be used, such as anthropometric assessment, RFH-SGA, and hand grip strength.

Introducción: Introducción: la malnutrición y la sarcopenia son frecuentes en la población con cirrosis hepática y generan un impacto negativo en el estado funcional y la esperanza de vida de estos pacientes. Existen múltiples herramientas para la valoración de la malnutrición y la sarcopenia en los pacientes con cirrosis hepática. Objetivo: valorar la malnutrición y la sarcopenia en la cirrosis hepática y comparar distintas herramientas diagnósticas aplicables en esta población. Método: se realizó un estudio analítico de corte transversal con muestreo a conveniencia mediante inclusión continua de pacientes con cirrosis hepática en un hospital de tercer nivel durante diciembre de 2018 a mayo de 2019. Se realizó la valoración nutricional con la antropometría del brazo, el índice de masa corporal (IMC) y el algoritmo del Royal Free Hospital Subjetive Global Assessment (RFH-SGA). Para la valoración de la sarcopenia se aplicó la fuerza de agarre de la mano con un dinamómetro. Los resultados se reportaron en medidas de tendencia central expresadas en frecuencia y porcentaje. Resultados: se incluyeron un total de 103 pacientes, predominando el género masculino (79,6 %), con una edad media de 51 años. La etiología más frecuente de la cirrosis hepática fue el consumo de alcohol (68 %), predominando la clase Child-Pugh C (57,3 %) con una media de MELD de 21,9 (± 8,9). Se reportó una media de IMC con peso seco de 25,2 kg/m2 y, respecto a la clasificación de la OMS, un 7,8 % se encontraban en bajo peso y un 59,2 % en malnutrición según la RFH-SGA. Un 88,3 % presentó sarcopenia al utilizar la fuerza de agarre de la mano, cuyo valor medio fue de 18,99 kg. Se realizó una correlación con Tau b de Kendall entre IMC y RFH-SGA sin evidenciarse ninguna asociación significativa, al igual que entre los percentiles de la circunferencia muscular media de brazo (MAMC) y la fuerza de agarre de la mano. Conclusiones: la valoración integral de la cirrosis hepática debe incluir el escrutinio de la malnutrición y la sarcopenia, existiendo herramientas de fácil acceso y aplicación segura validadas en esta población, como la valoración antropométrica, el RFH-SGA y la fuerza de agarre de la mano.

Multinational Prospective Cohort Study of Mortality Risk Factors in 198 ICUs of 12 Latin American Countries over 24 Years: The Effects of Healthcare-Associated Infections.

BACKGROUND: The International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) has found a high ICU mortality rate in Latin America. METHODS: A prospective cohort study in 198 ICUs of 96 hospitals in 46 cities in 12 Latin American countries to identify mortality risk factors (RF), and data were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Between 07/01/1998 and 02/12/2022, 71,685 patients, followed during 652,167 patient-days, acquired 4700 HAIs, and 10,890 died. We prospectively collected data of 16 variables. Following 11 independent mortality RFs were identified in multiple logistic regression: ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) acquisition (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.17; 95% CI: 1.06-1.30; p < 0.0001); catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) acquisition (aOR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.15-1.56; p < 0.0001); older age, rising risk 2% yearly (aOR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.02; p < 0.0001); longer indwelling central line(CL)-days, rising risk 3% daily (aOR = 1.03; 95% CI: 1.02-1.03; p < 0.0001); longer indwelling urinary catheter(UC)-days, rising risk 1% daily (aOR = 1.01; 95% CI: 1.01-1.26; p < 0.0001); higher mechanical ventilation (MV) (aOR = 6.47; 95% CI: 5.96-7.03; p < 0.0001) and urinary catheter-utilization ratio (aOR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.11-1.27; p < 0.0001); lower-middle level income country (aOR = 2.94; 95% CI: 2.10-4.12; p < 0.0001); private (aOR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.27-1.77; p < 0.0001) or public hospital (aOR = 1.47; 95% CI: 1.24-1.74; p < 0.0001) compared with university hospitals; medical hospitalization instead of surgical (aOR = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.59-1.75; p < 0.0001); neurologic ICU (aOR = 4.48; 95% CI: 2.68-7.50; p < 0.0001); adult oncology ICU (aOR = 3.48; 95% CI: 2.14-5.65; p < 0.0001); and others. CONCLUSION: Some of the identified mortality RFs are unlikely to change, such as the income level of the country, facility ownership, hospitalization type, ICU type, and age. But some of the mortality RFs we found can be changed, and efforts should be made to reduce CL-days, UC-days, MV-utilization ratio, UC-utilization ratio, and lower VAPs and CAUTI rates.

A 10-year experience with major burns from a non-burn intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review clinical data and outcomes of patients with burns in a Mexican non-burn intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: We did a retrospective analysis of our single-centre database of burn patients admitted to the ICU in the Hospital Civil Fray Antonio Alcalde (University Hospital). The sample was divided for analysis into two groups according to the outcome 'death' or 'discharge' from ICU. RESULTS: Overall mortality was 58.2%, without a decreasing trend in mortality rates through the years. We identified the presence of third-degree burns (odds ratio (OR) 1.5, p=0.003), and >49% total burned surface area (TBSA; OR 3.3, p≤0.001) was associated with mortality. Mean age was higher in deceased patients (38.2 years vs. 31.3 years, p=0.003) as was the TBSA (62.8% vs. 36.4%, p≤0.001). At multivariate analysis, inhalation injury was not associated with increased mortality, but it was with more mechanical ventilation days. Early surgical debridement/cleansing was performed in most patients; however, the mean of the procedures was 1.7 per patient in both groups. CONCLUSION: We identified significant factors associated with mortality. These variables and prognosis from non-burn ICUs differ broadly compared with burn intensive care units (BICUs); thus, more structured, multidisciplinary and specialised treatment strategies are still needed.