The different (sur)faces of Rap1p.

The DNA-binding protein Rap1p fulfills many different functions in the yeast cell. It targets 5% of the promoters, acting both as a transcriptional activator and as a repressor, depending on the DNA sequence context. In addition, Rap1p is an essential structural component of yeast telomeres, where it contributes to telomeric silencing. Here we review the evidence indicating that Rap1p function is modulated by the precise architecture of the its binding site and its surroundings: long tracts of telomeric repeats for telomeric functions, specific sequences and orientation for maximal transcriptional activation, and specific DNA recognition sequences for complementary factors in other cases. Many of these functions are probably related to chromatin organization around Rap1p DNA binding sites, resulting from the very tight binding of Rap1p to DNA. We propose that Rap1p alters its structure to bind to different versions of its DNA binding sequence. These structural changes may modulate the function of Rap1p domains, providing different interacting surfaces for binding to specific co-operating factors, and thus contributing to the diversity of Rap1p function.

Alternative mechanisms of transcriptional activation by Rap1p.

Single Rap1p DNA-binding sites are poor activators of transcription of yeast minimal promoters, even when fully occupied in vivo. This low efficiency is due to two independent repression mechanisms as follows: one that requires the presence of histones, and one that requires Hrs1p, a component of the RNA polymerase II mediator complex. Both repression mechanisms were greatly reduced for constructs with tandemly arranged sites. In these constructs, UASrpg sequences (ACACCCATACATTT) activated better than telomere-like sequences (ACACCCACACACCC) in an orientation-dependent manner. Both mutations in the SWI/SNF complex and a deletion of amino acids 597--629 of Rap1p (Tox domain) decreased synergistic effects of contiguous telomeric sites. Conversely, deletion of amino acids 700--798 of Rap1p (Sil domain) made UASrpg and telomeric sites functionally indistinguishable. We propose that the Sil domain masks the main transactivation domain of Rap1p in Rap1p-telomere complexes, where the Tox domain behaves as a secondary activation domain, probably by interacting with chromatin-remodeling complexes. Rap1p DNA-binding sites in ribosomal protein gene promoters are mainly UASrpg-like; their replacement by telomeric sequences in one of these promoters (RPS17B) decreased transcription by two-thirds. The functional differences between UASrpgs and telomeric sequences may thus contribute to the differential expression of Rap1p-regulated promoters in vivo.

Functional divergence between the half-sites of the DNA-binding sequence for the yeast transcriptional regulator Rap1p.

The yeast transcriptional regulator Rap1p binds to the DNA consensus sequence ACACCCAYACAYYY. We have previously shown that DNA-binding sites in which all four Y (Y=T or C) positions were Ts (UASrpg sequences) synergized more efficiently to activate transcription than sequences in which all Ys were Cs (telomere sequences) [F.-Z. Idrissi, J. Fernández-Larrea and B. Piña (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 284, 925-935]. Here we provide evidence that the DNA consensus sequence for Rap1p behaves as a combination of two ACAYYY half-sites with different functionality, the presence of Ts in the second half-site being the determinant for the transcriptional behaviour of the UASrpg sequences. DNA structure in the different complexes with Rap1p varied from being relatively uniform to appear rather distorted, this also being dependent on the presence of Ts in the second half-site. These distortions did not cause sharp bends or kinks in the DNA molecule. Computer analysis suggests that high-affinity binding of Rap1p to UASrpg sequences requires a rearrangement of the C-terminal Myb domain of the protein. We propose that the structural alterations in Rap1p-DNA complexes, both in the DNA and in the protein, affect the transcription potential of the complex in an allosteric manner. We also propose that the dimeric nature of the Rap1 DNA-binding domain is a key structural feature that explains the disparate functions of its DNA-binding sites in vivo.

Structural and functional heterogeneity of Rap1p complexes with telomeric and UASrpg-like DNA sequences.

Rap1p binds to a variety of related DNA sequences. We studied complexes of Rap1p and its DNA-binding domain with two of these sequences, the UASrpg sequence (5'-ACACCCATACATTT-3') and the Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomeric consensus (5'-ACACCCACACACCC-3'). When cloned in front of a minimal CYC1 promoter, the two sequences differed in their transcriptional potential. Whereas UASrpg or telomeric single binding sites activated transcription with approximately the same strength, adjacent UASrpg sequences showed higher synergistic activity and orientation-dependence than telomeric sequences. We also found different sequence requirements for Rap1p binding in vitro to both sequences, since a single base-pair that severely reduced binding of Rap1p to UASrpg sequences had very little effect on the telomeric sequence. The Rap1p binding domain distorted DNA molecules encompassing the UASrpg sequence or the telomeric-like sequence, as revealed by both KMnO4 hypersensitivity and by hydroxyl radical foot-printing analysis. We propose that Rap1p is able to form structurally and functionally different complexes, depending on the type of DNA sequence the complex is assembled from. This functional and structural heterogeneity may be responsible for the multiple functions that Rap1p binding sites appear to have in vivo.