Neurocognition in young offspring of individuals with bipolar disorder: The role of co-existing familial and clinical high-risk for bipolar disorder.

Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with cognitive dysfunction which has also been reported in offspring of individuals with BD (BDoff). However, it remains unclear whether cognitive underperformance in BDoff is associated with the presence of history of subclinical syndromes associated with risk for BD. To address this knowledge gap we assessed executive function, visual and verbal memory, working memory, processing speed and verbal fluency in 21 offspring with clinical high risk (CHR; BDoff+CHR), 54 offspring without CHR (BDoff-non-CHR), and 50 healthy individuals without familial risk of BD. BDoff underperformed compared to controls in most cognitive tasks. There was no significant neurocognitive difference between BDoff+CHR and BDoff-non-CHR except in the fluency/central executive domain (Cohen's d = 0.60, p = 0.03). Our results suggest that cognitive dysfunction in multiple domains is associated with familial predisposition to BD regardless of CHR status. On the other hand, abnormalities in central executive processes might be more pronounced in BDoff+CHR than BDoff-non-CHR. Further longitudinal studies investigating cognitive trajectory of BDoff and its interaction with the emergence of subclinical syndromes are needed to fully characterize the relationship between cognition and mood dysregulation in BD.

Neurocognitive heterogeneity in young offspring of patients with bipolar disorder: The effect of putative clinical stages.

BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with significant cognitive heterogeneity. In recent years, a number of studies have investigated cognitive subgroups in BD using data-driven methods and found that BD includes several subgroups including a severely impaired and a neurocognitively intact cluster. Studies in offspring of BD (BDoff) are particularly important to establish the timing of emergence of cognitive subgroups but studies investigating cognitive heterogeneity in BDoff are lacking. Our aim was to investigate cognitive heterogeneity in BDoff and the relationship between cognitive heterogeneity and putative clinical stages of BD. METHODS: Seventy-one euthymic BDoff and 50 healthy controls were assessed using clinical measures and a battery of neuropsychological tests. Neurocognitive subgroups were investigated using latent class analysis. RESULTS: Three neurocognitive subgroups, including a severe impairment group, a good performance cluster, and a subgroup characterized by intermediate/selective impairment was found. Both severe and intermediate level impairment subgroups underperformed healthy controls in processing speed, verbal fluency, visual memory and working memory. Deficits in verbal memory and executive functions were only evident in severe impairment subgroup. The putative stage of the illness had no significant effect on cognitive clustering of BDoff. Trait impulsivity scores were significantly increased in severe and intermediate impairment clusters but not in the cognitively good functioning subgroup of BDoff. LIMITATIONS: The cross-sectional nature of the study was the main consideration. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that cognitive heterogeneity is premorbid characteristic of BD and cognitive subgroups of BDoff emerge prior to the onset of illness and prodromal symptoms.