Assessment of enthesopathy in patients with fibromyalgia by using new sonographic enthesitis index.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to determine the frequency of enthesopathy in fibromyalgia (FM) by using a newly developed ultrasonography (US) method, the Madrid Sonography Enthesitis Index (MASEI). METHODS: This study was conducted on 38 consecutive patients with FM and 48 healthy sex- and age-matched controls. Six entheseal sites (olecranon tuberosity, superior and inferior poles of patella, tibial tuberosity, superior and inferior poles of calcaneus) on both lower limbs were evaluated. All US findings were identified according to MASEI. Scores of patients and controls were compared by Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test. Validity was analysed by receiver operating characteristic curve. Values of P < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Total enthesitis score was 7.39 ± 4.99 (mean ± SD) among FM patients and 3.7 ± 3.22 among healthy controls (P < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve established an ultrasound score of > 3.5 in the FM group as the best cut-off point to differentiate between cases and controls. No statistically significant correlation was found between the MASEI score and the FM disease duration, and the location of the tender points. CONCLUSIONS: Misdiagnoses of FM are harmful to patients and the community, and the presence of enthesopathy among FM patients increases. Its detection with the MASEI score may help to discriminate FM patients presenting with ill-defined symptoms and signs, in order to prevent mistreatment.

Avaliação de entesopatia em pacientes com fibromialgia por meio do novo índice ultrassonográfico de entesite / Assessment of enthesopathy in patients with fibromyalgia by using new sonographic enthesitis index

OBJETIVO: Determinar a frequência de entesopatia na fibromialgia (FM) utilizando um método de ultrassonografia (US) recém-desenvolvido, o escore Madrid Sonography Enthesitis Index (MASEI). MÉTODOS: Este estudo foi realizado em 38 pacientes com FM consecutivos e 48 controles saudáveis pareados para idade e sexo. Seis sítios de ênteses (tuberosidade do olécrano, polos superior e inferior da patela, tuberosidade tibial, polos superior e inferior do calcâneo) nos dois membros inferiores foram avaliados. Todos os achados da US foram identificados de acordo com o escore MASEI. Os escores de pacientes e controles foram comparados usando-se o teste t de Student e o teste U de Mann-Whitney. A validade foi analisada pela curva receiver operating characteristic (ROC). Valores de P < 0,05 foram considerados significativos. RESULTADOS: O escore total de entesite foi 7,39 ± 4,99 (média ± DP) para os pacientes com FM e 3,7 ± 3,22 para os controles saudáveis (P < 0,001). A curva ROC estabeleceu um escore de US > 3,5 no grupo de FM como o melhor ponto de corte para diferenciar casos de controles. Não houve correlação estatisticamente significativa entre o escore MASEI e a duração da FM, e a localização dos pontos dolorosos. CONCLUSÕES: Erros no diagnóstico de FM são prejudiciais aos pacientes e à comunidade, e a presença de entesopatia entre pacientes com FM é crescente. Sua detecção por meio do escore MASEI pode ser útil para discriminar pacientes com FM, cujos sintomas e sinais são mal definidos, para evitar equívoco de tratamento.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to determine the frequency of enthesopathy in fibromyalgia (FM) by using a newly developed ultrasonography (US) method, the Madrid Sonography Enthesitis Index (MASEI). METHODS: This study was conducted on 38 consecutive patients with FM and 48 healthy sex- and age-matched controls. Six entheseal sites (olecranon tuberosity, superior and inferior poles of patella, tibial tuberosity, superior and inferior poles of calcaneus) on both lower limbs were evaluated. All US findings were identified according to MASEI. Scores of patients and controls were compared by Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test. Validity was analysed by receiver operating characteristic curve. Values of P < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Total enthesitis score was 7.39 ± 4.99 (mean ± SD) among FM patients and 3.7 ± 3.22 among healthy controls (P < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve established an ultrasound score of > 3.5 in the FM group as the best cut-off point to differentiate between cases and controls. No statistically significant correlation was found between the MASEI score and the FM disease duration, and the location of the tender points. CONCLUSIONS: Misdiagnoses of FM are harmful to patients and the community, and the presence of enthesopathy among FM patients increases. Its detection with the MASEI score may help to discriminate FM patients presenting with ill-defined symptoms and signs, in order to prevent mistreatment.