A Case of Streptozocin Monotherapy for Unresectable Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumor G2.

BACKGROUND: Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are rare, and few reports have demonstrated the effectiveness of chemotherapy for duodenal NET, with not many other treatment options available. Here, we present a case of unresectable duodenal NET G2 that was effectively treated with streptozocin (STZ) monotherapy. We also perform a literature review. CASE SUMMARY: A 57-year-old man presented with multiple lymph node metastasis, liver metastasis, and bone metastasis that occurred after the primary resection of the duodenal NET G2. His long-term survival was obtained; the duration of stable disease exceeded 1 year and 6 months following STZ monotherapy. In addition, his CA 19-9 levels, which previously were increasing, normalized following treatment. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, no study has reported the effectiveness of STZ monotherapy for duodenal NET. Our findings demonstrate that for unresectable duodenal NETs, STZ should be first administered as a high volume/single dose to stabilize the disease. However, if the disease progresses, a combination therapy may be effective in obtaining a long-term prognosis of the patient. Furthermore, CA19-9 levels may be an effective factor for determining the therapeutic effect of STZ in NET with other metastases.

[A case of mature intestinal malrotation with cecal volvulus].

We report an uncommon case of an elderly patient with cecal volvulus caused by intestinal malrotation. We performed lower gastrointestinal endoscopy on an 84-year-old man with a chief complaint of abdominal distention and fever. However, emergency surgery had to be performed because intestinal perforation had occurred. The patient had cecal volvulus associated with incomplete rotation of the intestine. Subsequently, the patient developed multiple organ failure and died 2 days after the surgery. Despite its low incidence, we believe that the possibility of intestinal malrotation should be considered in elderly patients who present with abdominal distention for which the definitive diagnosis cannot be easily obtained.

[A Case of Laparoscopic Whole Layer Cholecystectomy for Elevated Lesion Suspected Biliary Cancer].

A case of attempted laparoscopic cholecystectomy for elevated lesion which was clearly early biliary cancer. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become popular as a minimally invasive surgical method, and is the primary choice for benign diseases. However for cases of suspected biliary cancer, open cholecystectomy, rather than laparoscopic, is recommended according to medical guidelines. The reason for this is that in cases of damage to the gallbladder, bile spillage to the abdominal cavity may occur, leading to port site recurrence and peritoneal recurrence. In addition, for invasion depth exceeding ss, or in cases of RAS cancer, the cancer may become exposed on the resected surface and remain. Hypothetically though, if the gallbladder is resected by total layer resection, RAS cancer can be removed. At this time, we performed a laparoscopic whole layer cholecystectomy for elevated lesion. We would like to report this case along with some bibliographic considerations.

[A Two-Stage Right Hemicolectomy Case in Which the First Surgery Was Laparoscopic Ileocecal Resection Based on Preoperative Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis].

We report a case oftwo -stage right hemicolectomy in which the first surgery performed was laparoscopic ileocecal resection based on the preoperative diagnosis ofacute appendicitis. The second surgery was performed based on pathological diagnosis ofadvanced cecal cancer accompanied by appendicitis. A 49-year-old woman came to our hospital with a chief complaint of abdominal pain in the lower quadrant for 1 week. Blood test results indicated an inflammatory response, with white blood cells at 10,000/mL and C-reactive protein of1 7.5mg/dL. Abdominal computed tomography showed a swollen appendix and increased uptake in adipose tissue around the appendix. The patient was diagnosed with acute appendicitis, and emergency laparoscopic surgery was performed. Because the cecum wall was thickened and formed an inflammatory mass, ileocecal resection was performed. The pathological diagnosis was advanced cecal cancer accompanied by appendicitis, with metastasis to lymph node No. 201; thus, right hemicolectomy and D3 dissection were performed 14 days after the first surgery. No tumor was found in additional resected tissues. The final diagnosis was cecal cancer: adenocarcinoma tub1, SE, N1, M0, Stage III a. The patient received adjuvant chemotherapy with XELOX and remains relapse free. Acute appendicitis is induced by certain mechanisms that cause appendiceal obstruction. Unlike young patients, middle-aged and elderly patients rarely develop acute appendicitis because ofa tumor causing appendiceal obstruction, which often makes preoperative or perioperative diagnosis difficult. The presence of cancer, such as cecal cancer, should be considered when appendicitis is accompanied by severe inflammation in elderly patients.