Loss of H3K27 methylation identifies poor outcomes in adult-onset acute leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Acute leukemia is an epigenetically heterogeneous disease. The intensity of treatment is currently guided by cytogenetic and molecular genetic risk classifications; however these incompletely predict outcomes, requiring additional information for more accurate outcome predictions. We aimed to identify potential prognostic implications of epigenetic modification of histone proteins, with a focus on H3K4 and H3K27 methylation marks in relation to mutations in chromatin, splicing and transcriptional regulators in adult-onset acute lymphoblastic and myeloid leukemia. RESULTS: Histone 3 lysine 4 di- and trimethylation (H3K4me2, H3K4me3) and lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) mark expression was evaluated in 241 acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 114 B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and 14T-cell ALL (T-ALL) patient samples at time of diagnosis using reverse phase protein array. Expression levels of the marks were significantly lower in AML than in B and T-ALL in both bone marrow and peripheral blood, as well as compared to normal CD34+ cells. In AML, greater loss of H3K27me3 was associated with increased proliferative potential and shorter overall survival in the whole patient population, as well as in subsets with DNA methylation mutations. To study the prognostic impact of H3K27me3 in the context of cytogenetic aberrations and mutations, multivariate analysis was performed and identified lower H3K27me3 level as an independent unfavorable prognostic factor in all, as well as in TP53 mutated patients. AML with decreased H3K27me3 demonstrated an upregulated anti-apoptotic phenotype. In ALL, the relative quantity of histone methylation expression correlated with response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients who carried the Philadelphia cytogenetic aberration and prior smoking behavior. CONCLUSION: This study shows that proteomic profiling of epigenetic modifications has clinical implications in acute leukemia and supports the idea that epigenetic patterns contribute to a more accurate picture of the leukemic state that complements cytogenetic and molecular genetic subgrouping. A combination of these variables may offer more accurate outcome prediction and we suggest that histone methylation mark measurement at time of diagnosis might be a suitable method to improve patient outcome prediction and subsequent treatment intensity stratification in selected subgroups.

Characteristics, outcomes, prognostic factors and treatment of patients with T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL).

BACKGROUND: T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL) is a rare and aggressive disease. In this study, we report our experience from 119 patients with T-PLL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the clinico-pathologic records of 119 consecutive patients with T-PLL, who presented to our institution between 1990 and 2016. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients with T-PLL were analysed. Complex karyotype and aberrations in chromosome 14 were seen in 65% and 52% patients, respectively. Seventy-five patients (63%) were previously untreated and 43 (37%) were initially treated outside our institution. Sixty-three previously untreated patients (84%) received frontline therapies. Overall, 95 patients (80%) have died. Median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis was 19 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 16-26 months]. Using recursive partitioning (RP), we found that patients with hemoglobin < 9.3 g/dl, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥ 1668 IU/l, white blood cell ≥ 208 K/l and ß2M ≥ 8 mg/l had significantly inferior OS and patients with hemoglobin < 9.3 g/dl had inferior progression-free survival (PFS). In multivariate analysis, we identified that presence of pleural effusion [hazard ratio (HR) 2.08 (95% CI 1.11-3.9); P = 0.02], high LDH (≥ 1668 IU/l) [HR 2.5 (95% CI 1.20-4.24); P < 0.001)], and low hemoglobin (< 9.3 g/dl) [HR 0.33 (95% CI 0.14-0.75); P = 0.008] were associated with shorter OS. Fifty-five previously untreated patients received treatment with an alemtuzumab-based regimen (42 monotherapy and 13 combination with pentostatin). Overall response rate, complete remission rate (CR) for single-agent alemtuzumab and alemtuzumab combined with pentostatin were 83%, 66% and 82%, 73% respectively. In patients who achieved initial CR, stem cell transplantation was not associated with longer PFS and OS. CONCLUSION: Outcomes in T-PLL remain poor. Multicenter collaborative effort is required to conduct prospective studies.

A clinical trial for patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes not eligible for standard clinical trials.

This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/leu.2016.303.

Comparison of clinical outcomes and prognostic utility of risk stratification tools in patients with therapy-related vs de novo myelodysplastic syndromes: a report on behalf of the MDS Clinical Research Consortium.

While therapy-related (t)-myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have worse outcomes than de novo MDS (d-MDS), some t-MDS patients have an indolent course. Most MDS prognostic models excluded t-MDS patients during development. The performances of the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), revised IPSS (IPSS-R), MD Anderson Global Prognostic System (MPSS), WHO Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS) and t-MDS Prognostic System (TPSS) were compared among patients with t-MDS. Akaike information criteria (AIC) assessed the relative goodness of fit of the models. We identified 370 t-MDS patients (19%) among 1950 MDS patients. Prior therapy included chemotherapy alone (48%), chemoradiation (31%), and radiation alone in 21%. Median survival for t-MDS patients was significantly shorter than for d-MDS (19 vs 46 months, P<0.005). All models discriminated survival in t-MDS (P<0.005 for each model). Patients with t-MDS had a significantly higher hazard of death relative to d-MDS in every risk model, and had inferior survival compared to patients with d-MDS within all risk group categories. AIC Scores (lower is better) were 2316 (MPSS), 2343 (TPSS), 2343 (IPSS-R), 2361 (WPSS) and 2364 (IPSS). In conclusion, subsets of t-MDS patients with varying clinical outcomes can be identified using conventional risk stratification models. The MPSS, TPSS and IPSS-R provide the best predictive power.

Bendamustine added to allogeneic conditioning improves long-term outcomes in patients with CLL.

Bendamustine has shown a favorable safety profile when included in chemotherapy regimens for several types of lymphoma, including CLL. This study investigated the long-term effect of adding bendamustine to a conditioning regimen on survival, rate of engraftment, immune recovery and GvHD after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) in CLL patients. These outcomes were compared with the fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) conditioning regimen. We reviewed the data for 89 CLL patients treated on three trials at our institution. Twenty-six (29%) patients received bendamustine, fludarabine and rituximab (BFR) and 63 (71%) received FCR. Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. Ten (38%) BFR-treated patients vs only two (3%) FCR-treated patients did not experience severe neutropenia (P=<0.001). The 3-year overall survival estimates for the BFR and FCR groups were 82 and 51% (P=0.03), and the 3-year PFS estimates were 63% and 27% (P=0.001), respectively. The 2-year treatment-related mortality was 8 and 23% and the incidence of grade 3 or 4 GvHD was 4% and 10%, respectively. This study is the first to report that addition of bendamustine to alloSCT conditioning for CLL patients is associated with improved survival and lower mortality, myelosuppression, and GvHD.

A clinical trial for patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes not eligible for standard clinical trials.

Most clinical trials exclude patients with poor performance or comorbidities. To study whether patients with these characteristics can be treated within a clinical trial, we conducted a study for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with poor performance, organ dysfunction or comorbidities. Primary endpoint was 60-day survival. Study included stopping rules for survival and response. Treatment consisted on a combination of azacitidine and vorinostat. Thirty patients (16 with MDS, 14 with AML) were enrolled. Median follow-up was 7.4 months (0.3-29). Sixty-day survival was 83%. No stopping rules were met. Main adverse events (AEs) were grades 1 and 2 gastrointestinal toxicities. In view of these results, we expanded the study and treated 79 additional patients: 27 with azacitidine (AZA) and 52 with azacitidine and vorinostat (AZA+V). Median follow-up was 22.7 months (12.6-47.5). Sixty-day survival rate was 79% (AZA=67%, AZA+V=85%, P=0.07). Median overall survival was 7.6 months (4.5-10.7). Median event-free survival was 4.5 months (3.5-5.6). Main AEs included grades 1 and 2 gastrointestinal toxicities. Our results suggest this subset of patients can be safely treated within clinical trials and derive clinical benefit. Relaxation of standard exclusion criteria may increase the pool of patients likely to benefit from therapy.