Comparative treatment planning study on sequential vs. simultaneous integrated boost in head and neck cancer patients: Differences in dose distributions and potential implications for clinical practice.

AIM: The purpose of this work was to compare sequential (SeqB) versus simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) radiotherapy plans delivered with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for patients with locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (HNSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: SeqB and SIB plans using VMAT for 10 HNSCC patients given definitive chemoradiation were generated and analysed for differences in dose distribution, coverage, conformity and homogeneity to the planning target volumes (PTV) 1-3 and sparing of organs at risk (OAR). RESULTS: The mean delineated volumes ± standard deviations were 137.7 ± 44.8, 351.3 ± 83.9 and 895.6 ± 120.5 cm3 for PTV1-3. The mean volumes encompassed by the corresponding 95 % isodoses were 281 (+ 110 %) ± 73.4, 712.2 (+ 115 %) ± 146.4 and 1381.1 (+ 54 %) ± 217.3 cm3 with SeqB and 138.2 (+ 7 %) ± 40.1, 380.4 (+ 11 %) ± 91.9 and 1057.3 (+ 21 %) ± 161.4 cm3 with SIB for PTV1-3, respectively. Both strategies achieved excellent PTV coverage. SeqB provided significantly better coverage of PTV1 and 3, worse conformity for PTV1-3 and a higher mean dose than prescribed (111-115 %) to PTV2 and 3 (p ≤ 0.007). Both strategies provided satisfactory OAR sparing. CONCLUSION: This study showed significant dosimetric differences with potential clinical relevance between two VMAT boost strategies regarding coverage, conformity and dose to the PTVs. SIB might cause less toxicity. A clinical phase III/IV trial endorsed by the German Head and Neck Clinical Trials Group (IAG-KHT) will evaluate differences in acute/late toxicity as well as in locoregional recurrences between the two boost techniques.

Long-term results of total body irradiation in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

PURPOSE: The aim of this chart review of adult patients treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with total body irradiation (TBI) was to evaluate early and late toxicity and long-term outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 110 adult patients (34 ± 12 years) with ALL underwent TBI (6 fractions of 2 Gy for a total of 12 Gy) as a part of the treatment regimen before transplantation. Treatment-related toxicity, mortality, and hematologic outcome are reported. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 70 months. The 2- and 5-year leukemia-free survival rates were 78 and 72%, respectively. In all, 29% (32/110) patients suffered from medullary recurrence after a median time of 7 months. Gender was the only statistically significant prognostic factor in terms of overall survival in favor of female patients. Treatment-related mortality and overall survival after 2 and 5 years were 16 and 22%, and 60 and 52.7%, respectively. The most frequent late reaction wascGVHD of the skin (n = 33, 30%). In addition, 15.5% (17/110 patients) suffered pulmonary symptoms, and 6 patients developed lung fibrosis. Eyes were frequently affected by the radiation (31/110 = 28%); 12 of 110 patients (11%) presented with symptoms from osteoporosis, 5 of 110 patients (4.5%) developed hypothyreosis and 2 patients diabetes mellitus. Of the male patients, 11% reported erectile dysfunction or loss of libido, while 2 of 36 women reported menopausal syndrome at the mean time of 28 months after treatment with requirement for substitution. No women became pregnant after treatment. No acute or late cardiac toxicities were documented in our patients. No secondary malignancies were documented. CONCLUSION: Although hematologic outcome was in the upper range of that reported in the literature, treatment-related mortality (TRM) and medullary recurrences remain a challenge. Sophisticated radiation techniques allow for decreasing toxicity to certain organs and/or dose escalation to the bone marrow in highly selected patients in order to improve therapeutic breadth.

Robotic radiosurgery as an alternative to brachytherapy for cervical cancer patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare MRI-guided brachytherapy (BT) and two different dose prescriptions for robotic radiosurgery (RRS) in locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eleven patients with FIGO stage IIB-IIIB cervical cancer underwent RRS instead of BT for various reasons. A total dose of 30 Gy was administered in five fractions. The maximum dose was chosen such that the prescribed dose was 70 % of the maximum dose (RRS70). To simulate BT more closely, additional plan calculations were carried out for a higher maximum dose with the same enclosing dose of 30 Gy being now 25 % of the maximum dose (RRS25). BT plans were calculated for the same patients (BTRRS). Finally, the resulting three sets of treatment plans were compared with 38 other patients treated with MRI-guided BT and the same dose prescription (BTref). Plan comparisons were performed based on DVH parameters with regard to target coverage (V100), conformation number (CN), and sparing of the organs at risk (OARs). RESULTS: The best coverage of V100 = 100 ± 0 % was obtained with RRS25, followed by RRS70 with 97.1 ± 2.7 %, BTref with 90.9 ± 8.9 %, and the intraindividual BTRRS with 80.6 ± 6.4 %. The sparing of OARs was associated with D0.1 cc, D2 cc, and D5 cc to the rectum, sigmoid, and bladder walls. OAR doses were compliant with the GEC-ESTRO guidelines and comparable among RRS70, RRS25, BTRRS, and BTref. By contrast, RRS25 could not fulfill these guidelines, exceeding considerably the tolerable dose constraints for the walls of the critical OARs. CONCLUSION: Despite of the excellent coverage and higher maximum dose, the unacceptably high exposure to the OARs disqualified RRS25 as an alternative for BT in cervical cancer patients. By contrast, RRS70 offered the best protection for the OARs, comparable to BT, and even better target coverage and conformity than BT.

Brachytherapy-emulating robotic radiosurgery in patients with cervical carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the technique, dosimetry, dose-volume-histograms (DVHs) and acute toxicity for CyberKnife® boost irradiation instead of intra-cervical brachytherapy in patients with cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eleven who were not suitable for brachytherapy with FIGO stage IIB-IIIB cervical cancer underwent primary chemoradiation. After fiducial implantation, T2 contrast-enhanced planning MRI and CT scans at 2-mm slice thickness were collected in the treatment position. The clinical target volume was defined as cervix + macroscopic residual tumour on MRI. Five fractions of 6 Gy each were prescribed to the target volume with a covering single dose 6 Gy. DVH parameters were evaluated for the target and organs at risk. Acute toxicity was documented once a week. RESULTS: DmeanPTV ranged from 33.6-40 Gy, median 36.7 Gy with a coverage of the PTV calculated to 100% of the prescribed dose ranging from 93.0-99.3% (median 97.7%). For the PTV the median CN was 0.78 (range, 0.66 to 0.87) and the median CI was 1.28 (range 1.15 to 1.52). Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity was mild. There was no grade 3 or higher GI and GU toxicity. After 6 months of follow up, there were no local recurrences. For the complete treatment, a median EQD2 to 1 cc and 2 cc of the bladder wall was 98.8 Gy and 87.1 Gy, respectively. Median EQD2 to 1 cc and 2 cc of the rectal wall was 72.3 Gy and 64 Gy, respectively, correlating with a risk < 10% for Grade 2-4 late toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery in patients with cervical cancer provides excellent target coverage with steep dose gradients toward normal tissues and safe DVH parameters for bladder, rectum and sigmoid. Acute toxicity was mild. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the oncological equality.

Helical tomotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost after laparoscopic staging in patients with cervical cancer: analysis of feasibility and early toxicity.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility and safety of the simultaneous integrated boost technique for dose escalation in combination with helical tomotherapy in patients with cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty patients (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IB1 pN1-IVA) underwent primary chemoradiation with helical tomotherapy. Before therapy, 29/40 patients underwent laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. In 21%, 31%, and 3% of the patients, pelvic, pelvic and para-aortic, and skip metastases in the para-aortic region could be confirmed. All patients underwent radiation with 1.8-50.4 Gy to the tumor region and the pelvic (para-aortic) lymph node region (planning target volume-A), and a simultaneous boost with 2.12-59.36 Gy to the boost region (planning target volume-B). The boost region was defined using titan clips during laparoscopic staging. In all other patients, standardized borders for the planning target volume-B were defined. High-dose-rate brachytherapy was performed in 39/40 patients. The mean biologic effective dose to the macroscopic tumor ranged from 87.5 to 97.5 Gy. Chemotherapy consisted of weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m(2). Dose-volume histograms and acute gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and hematologic toxicity were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean treatment time was 45 days. The mean doses to the small bowel, rectum, and bladder were 28.5 ± 6.1 Gy, 47.9 ± 3.8 Gy, and 48 ± 3 Gy, respectively. Hematologic toxicity Grade 3 occurred in 20% of patients, diarrhea Grade 2 in 5%, and diarrhea Grade 3 in 2.5%. There was no Grade 3 genitourinary toxicity. All patients underwent curettage 3 months after chemoradiation, which confirmed complete pathologic response in 38/40 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of simultaneous integrated boost for dose escalation in patients with cervical cancer is feasible, with a low rate of acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity. Whether dose escalation can be translated into improved outcome will be assessed after a longer follow-up time.

Helical tomotherapy in cervical cancer patients: simultaneous integrated boost concept: technique and acute toxicity.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the acute toxicity of simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique for dose escalation with helical tomotherapy (HT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 20 patients (FIGO IB1 pN1-IIIB) underwent primary chemoradiation. Prior to chemoradiation, a laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed. A boost region was defined using titanium clips during staging for planning target volume (PTV-B). Patients were treated with five weekly fractions of 1.8 Gy to a total dose of 50.4 Gy to the tumor region and the pelvic (para-aortic) lymph node region (PTV-A), and five weekly fractions of 2.12 Gy to a total dose of 59.36 Gy to the PTV-B. Chemotherapy consisted of weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m(2). 19 patients underwent brachytherapy. Dose-volume histograms were evaluated and acute gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), and hematologic toxicity were documented (CTCAE v3.0). RESULTS: Pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastases were confirmed in nine and four patients, respectively. Five patients refused laparoscopic staging. The mean volume of PTV-A and PTV-B was 1,570 ± 404 cm(3) and 341 ± 125 cm(3), respectively. The mean dose to the bladder, rectum, and small bowel was 47.85 Gy, 45.76 Gy, and 29.71 Gy, respectively. No grade 4/5 toxicity was observed. Grade 2/3 hematologic toxicity occurred in 50% of patients and 5% experienced grade 3 diarrhea. There was no grade 3 GU toxicity. 19 patients underwent curettage 6-9 weeks after chemoradiation without any evidence of tumor. CONCLUSION: The concept of SIB for dose escalation in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer is feasible with a low rate of acute toxicity. Whether dose escalation can translate into improved outcome will be assessed after a longer follow-up.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer. An intra-individual comparison of prone and supine positioning.

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiation for cervical cancer patients is associated with considerable gastrointestinal toxicity. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has demonstrated superiority in terms of target coverage and normal tissue sparing in comparison to conventional 3D planning in gynaecological malignancies. Whether IMRT in prone (PP) or supine position (SP) might be beneficial for cervical cancer patients remains partially unanswered. METHODS: 10 patients on FIGO stage IB-III cervical cancer, 6 patients for definitive and 4 patients for adjuvant external beam pelvic RT, were planned in PP and SP using a 7-field IMRT technique. IMRT plans for PP and SP (mean dose, Dmean 50.4 Gy) were optimized in terms of PTV coverage (1st priority) and small bowel sparing (2nd priority). A comparison of DVH parameters for PTV, small bowel, bladder, and rectum was performed. RESULTS: The comparison showed a similar PTV coverage of 95% of the prescribed dose and for target conformity in IMRT plans (PP, SP). PTV, rectum and bladder volumes were comparable for PP and SP. Significantly larger volumes of small bowel were found in PP (436 cc, + 35%, p = 0.01). PP decreased the volume of small bowel at 20-50.4 Gy (p < 0.05) and increased the rectum volumes covered by doses from 10-40 Gy (p < 0.01), the V50.4 was < 5% in both treatment positions. Bladder sparing was significant better at 50.4 Gy (p = 0.03) for PP. CONCLUSION: In this dosimetric study, we demonstrated that pelvic IMRT in prone position for patients with cervical cancer seems to be beneficial in reducing small bowel volume at doses >or=20 Gy while providing similar target coverage and target conformity. The use of frequent image guidance with KV (kilovolt) or MV (megavolt) computer tomography can reduce set-up deviations, and treatment in prone position can be done with a higher set-up accuracy. Clinical outcome studies are needed to affirm lower toxicity.

Early multiple organ failure after recurrent endotoxemia in the presence of vasoconstrictor-masked hypovolemia.

OBJECTIVE: Critically ill patients who develop multiple organ failure during systemic inflammatory states are often predisposed to hypovolemia and vasoconstrictor therapy. Although numerous investigations have evaluated the sequelae of systemic inflammation, no data are available on the contribution of chronic vasoconstrictor-masked hypovolemia to organ dysfunction and morphology. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized laboratory investigation. SETTING: University research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Eighteen adult chronically instrumented sheep. INTERVENTIONS: The animals were randomly assigned to one of three groups. In the norfenefrine-masked hypovolemia plus endotoxemia (NMH+ENDO) group, mean arterial pressures of 80 mm Hg were maintained by using the alpha1-adrenergic catecholamine norfenefrine for 52 hrs during hypovolemia. Hypovolemia was induced by hemorrhage (about 23 mL x kg(-1)) until mean arterial pressures reached 40 mm Hg. Endotoxin (0.5 microg x k(-1)) was then injected after 4, 16, 28, and 40 hrs. The NMH group received norfenefrine-masked hypovolemia but no endotoxin. In the ENDO group, recurrent endotoxemia was induced during normovolemia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Despite profound differences in fluid management, cardiovascular filling pressures were not statistically different between groups. Endotoxemia induced norfenefrine-refractory shock (p < .05 vs. the other groups) and contributed to renal dysfunction only during vasoconstrictor-masked hypovolemia. Norfenefrine-masked hypovolemia caused disseminated cardiac cell necrosis independent of endotoxemia (p < .05 vs. ENDO). CONCLUSIONS: Hypovolemia can be masked when volume status is monitored by filling pressures. In this new model of endotoxemia-associated multiple organ failure, chronic vasoconstrictor-masked hypovolemia turned systemic inflammation into a life-threatening condition with renal and cardiovascular failure. Cardiomyocyte necroses were caused by vasoconstrictor-masked hypovolemia but were unrelated to cardiovascular failure.