RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Multiple elements in the clinical learning environment have been found to influence medical students' learning experiences. A rich area of research, many factors are already known to influence students' experiences of learning which go on to impact later training choices. However, there is a knowledge gap specifically related to undergraduate medical students' experiences of surgical placement. This study aims to explore the lived experiences of medical students in their surgery rotation(s). DESIGN: A phenomenological study using semistructured interviews was conducted. Transcribed interview recordings were thematically analyzed using an iterative approach. SETTING: Participants were studying in a large medical school in the north of England. PARTICIPANTS: Fitting with the method, 6 undergraduate medical students, with at least 1 surgery placement took part in the study. RESULTS: Participants described issues including knowing the details of clinical opportunities, the clinical environment, and the portfolio; having a sense of involvement and previous surgical experiences; teaching and assessments; observation; and interactions. These experiences were also found to influence later career aspirations. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that undergraduate surgical learning experiences can be influenced by various themes: knowing the details of progression, the clinical environment, having a sense of involvement and previous experiences, constructive alignment of teaching and assessment, and professional identity formation. Future studies can explore methods such as personalized learning outcomes to enhance the overall learning experience of medical students.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Cirugía General , Investigación Cualitativa , Estudiantes de Medicina , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Cirugía General/educación , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Inglaterra , Adulto , Entrevistas como Asunto , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pain is often poorly managed in people who have a dementia. Little is known about how this patient population is managed in hospital, with research to date focused mainly on care homes. This study aimed to investigate how pain is recognised, assessed and managed in patients with dementia in a range of acute hospital wards, to inform the development of a decision support tool to improve pain management for this group. METHODS: A qualitative, multi-site exploratory case study. Data were collected in four hospitals in England and Scotland. Methods included non-participant observations, audits of patient records, semi-structured interviews with staff and carers, and analysis of hospital ward documents. Thematic analysis was performed through the lens of decision making theory. RESULTS: Staff generally relied on patients' self-report of pain. For patients with dementia, however, communication difficulties experienced because of their condition, the organisational context, and time frames of staff interactions, hindered patients' ability to provide staff with information about their pain experience. This potentially undermined the trials of medications used to provide pain relief to each patient and assessments of their responses to these treatments. Furthermore, given the multidisciplinary environment, a patient's communication about their pain involved several members of staff, each having to make sense of the patient's pain as in an 'overall picture'. Information about patients' pain, elicited in different ways, at different times and by different health care staff, was fragmented in paper-based documentation. Re-assembling the pieces to form a 'patient specific picture of the pain' required collective staff memory, 'mental computation' and time. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for an efficient method of eliciting and centralizing all pain-related information for patients with dementia, which is distributed in time and between personnel. Such a method should give an overall picture of a patient's pain which is rapidly accessible to all involved in their care. This would provide a much-needed basis for making decisions to support the effective management of the pain of older people with dementia in hospital.
Asunto(s)
Demencia/complicaciones , Dolor/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cuidadores , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Comunicación , Atención a la Salud/normas , Demencia/terapia , Inglaterra , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Investigación Cualitativa , EscociaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The recognition, assessment and management of pain in hospital settings is suboptimal, and is a particular challenge in patients with dementia. The existing process guiding pain assessment and management in clinical settings is based on the assumption that nurses follow a sequential linear approach to decision making. In this paper we re-evaluate this theoretical assumption drawing on findings from a study of pain recognition, assessment and management in patients with dementia. AIM: To provide a revised conceptual model of pain recognition, assessment and management based on sense-making theories of decision making. METHODS: The research we refer to is an exploratory ethnographic study using nested case sites. Patients with dementia (n=31) were the unit of data collection, nested in 11 wards (vascular, continuing care, stroke rehabilitation, orthopaedic, acute medicine, care of the elderly, elective and emergency surgery), located in four NHS hospital organizations in the UK. Data consisted of observations of patients at bedside (170h in total); observations of the context of care; audits of patient hospital records; documentary analysis of artefacts; semi-structured interviews (n=56) and informal open conversations with staff and carers (family members). FINDINGS: Existing conceptualizations of pain recognition, assessment and management do not fully explain how the decision process occurs in clinical practice. Our research indicates that pain recognition, assessment and management is not an individual cognitive activity; rather it is carried out by groups of individuals over time and within a specific organizational culture or climate, which influences both health care professional and patient behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a revised theoretical model of decision making related to pain assessment and management for patients with dementia based on theories of sense-making, which is reflective of the reality of clinical decision making in acute hospital wards. The revised model recognizes the salience of individual cognition as well as acknowledging that decisions are constructed through social interaction and organizational context. The model will be used in further research to develop decision support interventions to assist with the assessment and management of patients with dementia in acute hospital settings.