RESUMEN
The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is a key soft tissue stabilizer of the medial patella, with deficiency proven to be a key contributor to patellar dislocation. Reconstruction of this ligament has become a widely employed procedure in managing patients with recurrent patellar dislocation, and is also gaining popularity in the setting of primary dislocation. A wide variety of techniques have been described, differing in the type of graft used, sites for fixation and fixation technique. A number of complications have also been reported in the literature, including post-operative stiffness, apprehension, patellar fracture and recurrence of instability and dislocation. Here we report a case of an endobutton used in MPFL reconstruction becoming displaced after minimal trauma in a young female patient, subsequently causing patellofemoral irritation, patellar cartilaginous damage and functional limitation. This complication has not been previously reported to our knowledge and is one that surgeons must be aware of.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Accurate documentation of complications is fundamental to clinical audit and research. While it is established that accurate diagnosis of surgical site infection (SSI) requires follow-up for 30 days; for other complications, there are minimal data quantifying their importance between discharge and 30 days. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, inpatients undergoing general or vascular surgery were reviewed daily for complications by the medical team and a research fellow. A standardized telephone questionnaire was performed 30 days following surgery. All complications were documented and classified according to severity. RESULTS: A total of 237 of 388 patients who completed the telephone survey developed a complication, including 77 who developed a complication for the first time after discharge from hospital. Overall 135 (33%) of a total of 405 complications were identified after discharge. These complications included 36 of 63 (57%) SSI, 6 of 12 small bowel obstructions, and three of four major thromboembolic events and a number of space SSI, urinary infections, functional gastrointestinal problems, and pain management problems. Cardiac, respiratory, and neurologic complications were mainly diagnosed in hospital. Of the 135 "postdischarge" complications, 89 were managed in the community and 46 (34%) resulted in admission to hospital, including seven which required a major intervention. There was one death. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of complications occurred after discharge, and one-third of these resulted in readmission to hospital. Research and audit based on inpatient data alone significantly underestimates morbidity rates. Discharge planning should include contingency plans for managing problems commonly diagnosed after discharge form hospital.
Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Auditoría Clínica , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
National Health Service (NHS) statistics in the United Kingdom demonstrate an increase in clinical negligence claims over the past 30 years. Reasons for this include elements of a cultural shift in attitudes toward the medical profession and the growth of the legal services industry. This issue affects medical and surgical health providers worldwide.The authors analyzed 2117 NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) orthopedic surgery claims between 1995 and 2001 with respect to these clinical areas: emergency department, outpatient care, surgery (elective or trauma operations), and inpatient care. The authors focused on the costs of settling and defending claims, costs attributable to clinical areas, common causes of claims, and claims relating to elective or trauma surgery. Numbers of claims and legal costs increased most notably in surgery (elective and trauma) and in the emergency department. However, claims are being defended more robustly. The annual cost for a successful defense has remained relatively stable, showing a slight decline. The common causes of claims are postoperative complication; wrong, delayed, or failure of diagnosis; inadequate consent; and wrong-site surgery. Certain surgical specialties (eg, spine and lower-limb surgery) have the most claims made during elective surgery, whereas upper-limb surgery has the most claims made during trauma surgery.The authors recommend that individual trusts liaise with orthopedic surgeons to devise strategies to address areas highlighted in our study. Despite differences in health care systems worldwide, the underlying issues are common. With improved understanding, physicians can deliver the service they promise their patients.
Asunto(s)
Mala Praxis/legislación & jurisprudencia , Programas Nacionales de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Ortopedia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Compensación y Reparación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Humanos , Responsabilidad Legal/economía , Mala Praxis/economía , Mala Praxis/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Ortopedia/economía , Ortopedia/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
The deep midpalmar space of the hand communicates with the space of Parona in the forearm. Infection of these deep spaces can be difficult to diagnose. This article presents the first reported case of acute compartment syndrome of the forearm secondary to infection within the space of Parona. This article discusses the anatomy of the space of Parona, highlighting its communicating spaces and the importance of recognizing a deep-space infection of the hand as a possible cause of compartment syndrome of the forearm. This article also suggests a method of clinical examination to aid in the diagnosis of infection within the space of Parona to allow more specific planning of surgical intervention through early decompressive surgery, with surgical exploration to exclude and drain infection when no other clear cause for the rise in pressure within the osteofascial compartment is apparent.
Asunto(s)
Síndromes Compartimentales/diagnóstico , Antebrazo/patología , Mano , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Aguda , Síndromes Compartimentales/microbiología , Síndromes Compartimentales/cirugía , Femenino , Mano/microbiología , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/complicaciones , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Diaphyseal medullary stenosis is a rare skeletal dysplasia of unknown etiology with potential autosomal dominant genetic inheritance. A variant of diaphyseal medullary stenosis has been associated with a high risk of malignant transformation, specifically in the form of malignant fibrous histiocytoma. This potential combination of diaphyseal medullary stenosis and malignant fibrous histiocytoma is known as Hardcastle syndrome. This article presents a case of a 32-year-old man with osteoarthrosis of the knee as a consequence of Hardcastle syndrome for which he underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a satisfactory outcome. Our case demonstrates pathological and radiological signs of skull involvement, which has not previously been reported in the literature as a manifestation of this condition. We discuss the differential diagnoses of diaphyseal dysplasia that should be considered in such cases and advocate the use of a triad of preoperative radiological investigations, including early thallium isotope bone, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography. We also discuss the use of long-stemmed prostheses, extramedullary femoral alignment, and the concerns of using Computer Assisted Surgery for total knee arthroplasty in patients with diaphyseal medullary stenosis.With the short-term success of TKA in Hardcastle syndrome, we found that TKA could be considered as an alternative treatment option in symptomatic patients. However, due to the fact that the potential for malignant transformation in this syndrome is unchanged by a TKA, the patient should remain under close clinical and radiological follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Histiocitoma Fibroso Benigno/diagnóstico por imagen , Histiocitoma Fibroso Benigno/cirugía , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Radiografía , Esclerosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Esclerosis/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Accidentes de Tránsito , Aorta Torácica/lesiones , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Traumatismo Múltiple/terapia , Ortopedia/métodos , Adulto , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico , Errores Diagnósticos , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Motocicletas , Radiografía , Traumatismos Torácicos/terapiaRESUMEN
Introduction and aims A single hip screw is the recommended method of fixation for slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE). Current practice favours the placement of the screw in the centre of the femoral head on both anteroposterior and lateral planes to avoid the risks of chondrolysis and avascular necrosis (AVN). We investigated the correlation between different positions of the screw in the femoral head and the prevalence of AVN, chondrolysis, late slippage and the time to epiphyseal closure. Methods The clinical notes and radiographs of 38 consecutive patients (61 hips) who underwent single screw fixation for SUFE were evaluated retrospectively with a mean follow-up of 36 months. Two-way ANOVA and the post hoc test was performed to analyse the correlation between the different variables and the outcome at the 5% level of significance. Results There were 16 acute slips, 18 chronic slips and ten acute-on-chronic slips. Seventeen slips were treated prophylactically. Mild slip was encountered in 39 hips, moderate slip in four and severe slip in one. The central-central position was only achieved in 51% of cases. The most significant results of the study were as follows: (1) no significant difference between the time to epiphyseal closure and the position of the screw, and (2) no late slippage or chondrolysis was observed in our series. Conclusion Our results showed that the positioning of the screw other than in the centre of the femoral head has the ability to provide physeal stability and has no correlation with the timing to closure of the epiphysis and the risk of avascular necrosis or chondrolysis. We therefore recommend that other positions be considered if the "optimal central-central position" is not initially achieved - specifically for the treatment of mild slip - as the potential hazards from several attempts to achieve the optimum position outweigh the benefits.