Evaluation of the MDACC clinical classification system for pancreatic cancer patients in an European multicenter cohort.

BACKGROUND: The MDACC group recommends to extend the current borderline classification for pancreatic cancer into three groups: type A patients with resectable/borderline tumor anatomy, type B with resectable/borderline resectable tumor anatomy and clinical findings suspicious for extrapancreatic disease and type C with borderline resectable and marginal performance status/severe pre-existing comorbidity profile or age>80. This study intents to evaluate the proposed borderline classification system in a multicenter patient cohort without neoadjuvant treatment. METHODS: Evaluation was based on a multicenter database of pancreatic cancer patients undergoing surgery from 2005 to 2016 (n = 1020). Complications were classified based on the Clavien-Dindo classification. χ2-test, Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox regression hazard model were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Most patients (55.1%) were assigned as type A patients, followed by type C (35.8%) and type B patients (9.1%). Neither the complication rate, nor the mortality rate revealed a correlation to any subgroup. Type B patients had a significant worse progression free (p < 0.001) and overall survival (p = 0.005). Type B classification was identified as an independent prognostic marker for progression free survival (p = 0.005, HR 1.47). CONCLUSION: The evaluation of the proposed classification in a cohort without neoadjuvant treatment did not justify an additional medical borderline subgroup. A new subgroup based on prognostic borderline patients might be the main target group for neoadjuvant protocols in future.

Circumportal Pancreas-a Must Know Pancreatic Anomaly for the Pancreatic Surgeon.

PURPOSE: Circumportal pancreas is a rare congenital pancreatic anomaly with encasement of the portal vein and/or the superior mesenteric vein by pancreatic tissue. It is often overlooked on cross-sectional imaging studies and can be encountered during pancreatic surgery. Pancreatic head resection with circumportal pancreas is technically difficult and bears an increased risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of our data base for all patients who had undergone pancreatic head resection between 2004 and 2015 was performed. RESULTS: We identified six patients out of 1102 patients who had undergone pancreatic head surgery in the study period. CT-scan and MRI were never able to identify circumportal pancreas prior to surgery. The right hepatic an artery derived from the superior mesenteric artery in four cases (67%). Additional resection of the pancreatic body was always performed. Postoperative course was uneventful in all cases without occurrence of pancreatic fistula. CONCLUSIONS: Circumportal pancreas is a rare entity every pancreatic surgeon should be aware of. It is difficult to identify on cross-sectional imaging studies. A right hepatic artery arising from the superior mesenteric artery should raise suspicion of circumportal pancreas. Additional pancreatic tissue resection should be performed during pancreatic head resections to avoid pancreatic fistula.

[Distal Pancreatectomy with Autologous Fibrin Sealant - Implementation of an Established Concept of Tissue Sealing in Pancreatic Surgery]. / Die Pankreaslinksresektion mit autologem Fibrinkleber ­ Anwendung eines etablierten Versiegelungskonzepts in der Pankreaschirurgie.

Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) remain a major concern after distal pancreatectomy. Irrespective of the technique to close the pancreatic remnant, pancreatic fistulas will occur in approximately 30 % of patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy. For the first time ever, autologous fibrin sealant (Vivostat®) was used to additionally seal the pancreatic remnant after a distal pancreatectomy. The aim was to analyse whether this changes the postoperative outcome. Patients/Material and Methods: In 2015, a technical case series was performed in 15 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy. The pancreatic remnant was additionally sealed with autologous fibrin sealant (Vivostat®). Results: A postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) occurred in 5/15 patients (33 %). One patient had a POPF grade A (1/15, 6.7 %), whereas a POPF grade B occurred in 4/15 patients (26.7 %). 75 % (3/4) of the patients with a POPF grade B were sufficiently treated with antibiotics, whereas a CT-guided percutaneous drainage had to be placed only in one case. Conclusion: Autologous fibrin sealant is simple to apply and seems to be well tolerated. However, it does not seem to avoid the development of postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy.

Can the new RCP R0/R1 classification predict the clinical outcome in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head?

PURPOSE: According to the International Union Against Cancer (UICC), R1 is defined as the microscopic presence of tumor cells at the surface of the resection margin (RM). In contrast, the Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) suggested to declare R1 already when tumor cells are found within 1 mm of the RM. The aim of this study was to determine the significance of the RM concerning the prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: From 2007 to 2009, 62 patients underwent a curative operation for PDAC of the pancreatic head. The relevance of R status on cumulative overall survival (OS) was assessed on univariate and multivariate analysis for both the classic R classification (UICC) and the suggestion of the RCP. RESULTS: Following the UICC criteria, a positive RM was detected in 8 %. Along with grading and lymph node ratio, R status revealed a significant impact on OS on univariate and multivariate analysis. Applying the suggestion of the RCP, R1 rate rose to 26 % resulting in no significant impact on OS in univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has shown that the RCP suggestion for R status has no impact on the prognosis of PDAC. In contrast, our data confirmed the UICC R classification of RM as well as N category, grading, and lymph node ratio as significant prognostic factors.

Complicated sigmoid diverticulitis--Hartmann's procedure or primary anastomosis?

INTRODUCTION: Diverticular disease of the colon is a common condition in developed countries. For perforated diverticulitis Hartmann's procedure is a safe and quick treatment option. But intestinal restoration needs further interventions. This leads to high complication rates and cost. Therefore a critical evaluation of surgical treatment options is necessary. METHODS: During a period of 18 months 88 patients underwent surgical resection for diverticulitis. Forty patients had emergency surgery. Among those a primary anastomosis was performed in 21 patients. The other 19 patients had interval colostomy. Among 21 patients with primary anastomosis major complications occurred in two patients, vs. twelve in patients with Hartmann's operation (p = 0.03). In the Hartmann group eight patients had major general complications, vs. one patient in the group with primary anastomosis (p = 0.06). The mean hospital stay was 38 days after Hartmann's procedure, vs. 13 days for patients with primary anastomosis (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In emergency surgery for complicated diverticulitis primary anastomosis is not associated with an increased postoperative morbidity. A primary anastomosis reduces the need for further surgical interventions and complex re-operations. Thus, an overall reduction of morbidity, cost, complication rate and hospital stay is possible. Therefore this technique is advantageous for patients and hospitals.

[Amyloidosis of the small intestine following whipple operation is a rare cause of chronic ileus and has to be considered as differential diagnosis]. / Die Amyloidose des Dünndarms als seltene Differenzialdiagnose eines chronischen Ileus nach Whipple-Operation.

INTRODUCTION: When patients who underwent a Whipple operation because of a tumour of the pancreas develop symptoms of chronic ileus several months after surgery, the most common cause is a relapse of tumour growth or a peritoneal carcinomatosis. In this paper we report that secondary amyloidosis of the small intestine can produce similar symptoms and has to be evaluated as a rare differential diagnosis in chronic ileus. CASE REPORTS: Three patients (2 men: 82, 70 years old and 1 woman 70 years old) were admitted to our hospital with symptoms of chronic ileus. All of them had undergone a Whipple operation several months (4, 5, 13 months) before. In two patients surgery was performed due to carcinoma in situ and in one patient due to benign cystadenoma of the pancreas. Chronic ileus resulted in relaparotomy in all patients. Surprisingly, the intraoperative situs did not show any tumour growth. Instead severe adhesions of the small intestine were detected. The entire small intestine was covered with a substance that had a similar aspect to sugar icing. Thereby the motility of the small intestine was constricted. An extensive adhaesiolysis and a decompression of the bowel was carried out. By histopathology, amyloidosis was diagnosed using congo red staining. Diffuse amyloid deposits were found on the small intestine. In the postoperative course two patients could be discharged free of complaints after 7 to 9 days in the hospital. One man died four months later, after transfer to a geriatric hospital, because of intestinal atony and a serious senile depression. CONCLUSION: Secondary amyloidosis following the Whipple operation is a rare reason for the symptoms of chronic ileus. Surgeons have to keep in mind that amyloidosis is a possible differential diagnosis in addition to relapse of tumour growth and peritoneal carcinomatosis in these patients. Thus, in our opinion, relaparotomy should be undertaken as early as possible because this is the only chance to detect the cause of chronic ileus.

[Distal pancreatectomy: radical or spleen-preserving?]. / Pankreaslinksresektion: Wann radikal, wann milzerhaltend?

During recent years, spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) has broadened the operative spectrum in pancreatic surgery. The rationale for spleen-preserving procedures comprises prevention of overwhelming postsplenectomy infection syndrome (OPSI) and possibly an advantage regarding reduced carcinogenesis. Although there are no prospective randomized trials, SPDP and distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (DPSx) seem to be equivalent in terms of blood loss, operative time, mortality and frequency of reoperation. Concerning pancreatic fistulas and other major surgical complications, current data from the literature are conflicting. Long-term effects of SPDP, such as development of gastric varices due to portal hypertension, are still insufficiently investigated. However, SPDP should always be considered in patients with benign tumors of the pancreatic tail and chronic pancreatitis. Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy can also be combined with resection of the splenic vessels (DPSx-SVx) if the blood supply of the spleen via the small gastric vessels and the gastro-epoploic arcade is sufficient. In the presence of malignant tumors, DPSx is necessary for oncological reasons.

[Modulation of humoral immunity in the mouse by means of grafts carrying reticulated polysaccharides]. / Modulation de l'immunité humorale chez la souris au moyen de polysaccharides réticulés porteurs de greffons.

Synthetic reticulated polysaccharides grafted with linear amino-acids or amines have been submitted to the test of localized hemolysis in gel (Jerne). Some of them show a statistically highly significant immuno-stimulating power in Mice.