RESUMEN
Histiocytic sarcoma (HS) is a rare, aggressive non-Langerhans histiocytic cell neoplasm of hematopoietic origin. Histiocytic sarcoma is prone to early systemic metastasis, rendering early diagnosis and treatment critical determinants for patient outcome. Primary HS originating from the central nervous system (CNS) is exceptionally rare and portends a poor prognosis. This grim clinical course is further complicated by the challenging diagnosis and the lack of standard treatment guidelines for the disease. This is due to the exceptionally rare nature of primary CNS histiocytic sarcoma and the limited data available on the successful management of the disease, prompting the therapeutic approach to be guided by retrospective data from case reports or single-institutional studies with a limited number of patients. Here, we report a case of a young Middle Eastern male who was diagnosed with primary CNS histiocytic sarcoma, successfully treated with frontotemporal craniotomy and adjuvant radiation therapy. We also elucidate the role of the CD163 biomarker in diagnosing HS and using surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) as a successful treatment approach for primary CNS histiocytic sarcoma.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Although valve repair is applied routinely nowadays, particularly for mitral regurgitation (MR) or tricuspid regurgitation (TR), valve replacement using prosthetic valves is also common especially in adults. Unfortunately the valve with ideal hemodynamic performance and long-term durability without increasing the risk of bleeding due to long-term anticoagulant therapy has not been introduced. Therefore, patients and physicians must choose either bioprosthetic or mechanical valves. Currently, there is an increasing clinical trend of using bioprosthetic valves instead of mechanical valves even in young patients apparently because of their advantages. METHODS: Seventy patients undergone valvular replacement using bioprosthetic valves were evaluated by ECG and Echocardiography to assess the rhythm and ejection fracture. Mean follow-up time was 33 months (min 9, max 92). RESULTS: Mortality rate was 25.9% (n=18) within 8 years of follow-up. Statistical analysis showed a significant relation between atrial fibrillation rhythm and mortality (P=0.02). Morbidities occurred in 30 patients (42.8%). Significant statistical relation was found between the morbidities and age over 65 years old (P=0.005). In follow-up period, 4 cases (5.7%) underwent re-operation due to global valve dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that using biprosthetic valve could reduce the risk of morbidity occurrence in patient who needs valve replacement. However, if medical treatments fail, patients should be referred for surgery. This would reduce the risk of mortality because of lower incident of complications such as atrial fibrillation and morbidities due to younger patients' population.
