Efficacy of Follow-up Care System of Living Kidney Donors in Monitoring of Residual Kidney Function.

BACKGROUND: The possibility of an increased risk of end-stage renal disease is a major concern associated with living kidney donation. Therefore, monitoring of residual kidney function becomes most essential. METHODS: A data analysis of 156 living kidney donors (LKDs) was conducted. The efficacy of the long-term care system with regard to monitoring residual kidney function was evaluated. RESULTS: The analyzed group consisted of 102 (65.4%) women. The mean follow-up period was 5.44 years. The rise in value of mean serum creatinine concentration after donation was observed, but it was within the range of normal during the observation period. Despite its initial decline after nephrectomy, mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) remained >60 mL/min/1.73 m2. A MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) GFR in the range of 45-60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was observed in 53 donors (33.97%). It was found to be <45.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 in 15 cases (9.6%). No patient developed end-stage renal disease. Only 25.0% of those analyzed had their CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) GFR estimated on 45-60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 4.49% were found to have levels of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (down to 33.7 mL/min/1.73 m2). Mean postdonation CKD-EPI GFR was estimated at 69.99% of its predonation value. CONCLUSION: A reliable qualification process could minimize the probability of kidney donation by someone with an increased risk of chronic kidney failure. The CKD-EPI formula seems to be more precise than the MDRD for estimatation of LKDs' GFR, as their loss of GFR is a result of nephrectomy and not kidney or systemic disease. Using the MDRD formula may lead to inappropriate diagnosis of CKD in some cases.

Role of Transforming Growth Factor-ß in Hypertensive Living Kidney Donors.

BACKGROUND: Transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) is involved in the pathogenesis of hypertension and the development of hypertensive target organ damage. TGF-ß may promote blood pressure elevation through several mechanisms. The identification of risk factors of hypertension in living kidney donors may provide proper postoperative management. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the serum TGF-ß concentration in living kidney donors after nephrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 66 living donor open nephrectomies were performed in the Department of General and Transplantation Surgery at the Medical University of Warsaw between 1995 and 2005. Forty living kidney donors reported for the follow-up. Physical examination, blood and urine tests, ECG, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, cardiac sonography, and ophthalmoscopy were performed. Serum TGF-ß concentration was measured by ELISA. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 13.0. RESULTS: The mean observation period was 65.6 months. The mean donor age at the time of donation and at the follow-up visit was 40.7 and 46.2, respectively. Hypertension was observed in 24% women and in 37% men after surgery. The significantly higher frequency of hypertension was observed after nephrectomy (P = .001). The strongest predictor of hypertension was age. The mean serum TGF-ß concentration was 39.3 ng/mL. No significant differences were observed between hypertensive and normotensive donors (P = .061). A significantly higher TGF-ß concentration was found 4 and 5 years after donation (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: TGF-ß is not associated with hypertension and glomerular filtration rate in living kidney donors after nephrectomy. Careful monitoring of hypertension in living kidney donors after nephrectomy is essential.

Psychological Aspects of Living Kidney Donation in Poland: Experience of One Center.

BACKGROUND: Living kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment of end-stage renal disease. The benefits for recipients are obvious. The psychological consequences for living kidney donors in Poland are not known. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the psychological aspects of living kidney donation in Poland. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 66 living donor open nephrectomies were performed in our institution between 1995 and 2005. The psychological aspects were assessed in 40 donors after nephrectomy. The study applied the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), the Situation Assessment Questionnaire, the Health Behaviors Survey, and our own questionnaire. The mean observation period was 65.6 months. RESULTS: There was a trend toward better life satisfaction in living kidney donors compared to Polish adults. Donor life satisfaction was significantly lower when the recipient was dead than when the recipient was alive. Most donors perceived the kidney donation as a challenge in cognitive judgment. The mean score of the Health Behaviors Survey was not significantly different than in the general population in Poland. The mean pain score after donation was 3.2 in a 5-item scale (1 = severe pain, 5 = mild pain). The mean time of return to work was 3.5 months. No donors regretted their decisions about kidney donation. CONCLUSION: Living kidney donation in Poland has a positive impact on donors' quality of life. Among living kidney donors, the sense of danger concerning the risk of donation depends on the degree of the relationship with the recipient.

Do Anatomical Anomalies Affect the Results of Living Donor Kidney Transplantation?

BACKGROUND: Multiple renal artery kidneys still represent a special challenge for surgeons, during both nephrectomy for organ donation and transplantation. Recognition of anatomical conditions with advanced imaging methods is one of the most important elements of the preoperative evaluation process. AIM: The purpose of the current study was to assess if anatomical abnormalities affect the outcomes of living kidney donor transplantation procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 60 living kidney donors and their recipients was performed. Patients were assigned to two groups: pairs with a single allograft vessels (group I) and pairs with any anatomical abnormalities of the transplanted organ (group II). The impact of anatomical abnormalities on initial and long-term outcomes of the transplantation were analyzed. RESULTS: The analyzed study group consisted of 60 pairs (35 included in group I and 25 in group II). Immediate graft function was observed in 65.7% vs 64% individuals, recpectively (n.s.). Mean serum creatinine concentration was 1.6, 1.46, and 1.44 mg/mL (group I) vs 1.78, 1.78, and 1.65 mg/mL (group II) at 1, 6, and 12 months posttransplant, respectively (n.s.). Glomerular filtration rate (using the Chronic Kindey Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation) was estimated at 54.3, 59.9, and 61.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 (group I) vs 59.8, 57.6, and 59.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 (group II) at the same time points, respectively (n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Presence of single renal vessels was not a predictor of immediate graft function in living-donor kidney transplantation. Transplantation outcomes for kidneys with anatomical anomalies did not differ when compared to organs with typical anatomy. Multiple renal arteries did not impact initial graft function if precise surgical technique and proper preoperative diagnostics were provided.

Does Low Birthweight Have an Impact on Living Kidney Donor Outcomes?

INTRODUCTION: Because nearly 30,000 people worldwide become living kidney donors each year, donor safety is of the utmost importance. Recent studies have shown that living kidney donation is associated with an increased relative risk for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). It is essential to determine which donors will be more likely to develop ESRD. One of the risk factors for ESRD in living kidney donors is hypertension and, because there are studies demonstrating that low birthweight is a risk factor for developing hypertension in adult life, we hypothesized that donors with low birthweight may be at higher risk of developing renal disease after donation. METHODS: Seventy-three living kidney donors were examined. Donors were divided into 2 cohorts: a group with low birthweight and group with normal birthweight. We checked whether the donor birthweight has an impact on the outcome of donor renal function and on the development of hypertension. RESULTS: Hypertension was observed statistically more frequent in the group with low birthweight (P = .003). CONCLUSION: Glomerular filtration rate before kidney donation was found to be lower in the low-birthweight group.

Comparison of Kidney Transplantation Results From the Same Deceased Donor Between Patients With the First Transplantation and Retransplanted Patients.

BACKGROUND: It has been determined that there are about 25% patients with renal allograft failure on the waiting lists. METHODS: We analyzed 406 patients who received a kidney graft from 2013 to 2015 in a single center. The analysis resulted in 33 pairs of patients: for one recipient in the pair it was the first transplantation and for the other it was the second or a subsequent one. Graft and patient survival, graft function, delayed graft function episodes, primary nonfunction, and acute rejection episodes were analyzed to assess the outcome of kidney retransplantation. The follow-up period was 2 years. Delayed graft function was observed in both groups (P = .3303). RESULTS: Although in the second group there were twice as many episodes of acute rejection than in the first group (8 to 4), the results are not statistically significant (P = .1420). Primary graft dysfunction was observed only in the second group. Five patients who had lost their kidney graft during the follow-up period were observed in the second group. The probability of graft loss in the second group was as follows: 3% on the day of the transplantation, 12% after 3 months, and 15% after 13 months. All of the patients survived during the 2-year follow-up period. A similar estimated glomerular filtration rate was observed in dialysis time in both groups. CONCLUSION: There are no statistically significant differences in kidney graft function between patients with the first transplantation and those with the repeat one. Good kidney transplantation results are attainable in both groups. It seems that retransplantation is the best treatment option for patients with primary graft failure.

Pathologies in Living Kidney Donors Diagnosed in the Long-Term Care System.

Kidney donation should not lead to deterioration of the donor's health condition, both during the perisurgical period and in the long term. Safety of a living kidney donor becomes a prerequisite for his/her qualification. Detailed diagnostic procedures are performed to exclude any abnormalities of his/her health condition. Additionally, a long-term post-donation follow-up system for kidney donors has been set up in Poland besides the restrictive qualification system. Transplantation centers are obligated to provide a diagnostic procedures for living organ donors as a part of the monitoring of their health condition and to ensure them a medical follow-up for 10 years after the donation. A total of 141 cases of unilateral nephroureterectomy performed in 2003-2014 to obtain a kidney for transplantation were considered. Medical files of post-donation diagnostic or therapeutic methods and their outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of monitoring of donors' health condition within the framework of the long-term follow-up system for kidney donors in the aspect of detection of the donation-independent abnormalities.

Impact of pretransplant body mass index on early kidney graft function.

BACKGROUND: An increase in the number of obese patients on transplantation waiting lists can be observed. There are conflicting results regarding the influence of body mass index (BMI) on graft function. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective study of 859 adult patients who received a renal graft from deceased donors. BMI (kg/m(2)) was calculated from patients' height and weight at the time of transplantation. Kidney recipients were subgrouped into 4 groups, according to their BMI: Groups A (<18.5; n = 57), B (18.6-24.9; n = 565), C (25-29.9; n = 198) and D (>30; n = 39). Primary or delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR) episodes, and number of reoperations, graft function expressed by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and serum creatinine concentration and number of graft loss as well as the recipient's death were analyzed. The follow-up period was 1 year. RESULTS: Obese patients' grafts do not develop any function more frequently in comparison with their nonobese counterparts (P < .0001; odds ratio [OR], 32.364; 95% CI, 2.174-941.422). Other aspects of the procedure were analyzed to confirm that thesis: Cold ischemia time and number of HLA mismatches affect the frequency of AR (OR, 1.0182 [P = .0029] and OR, 1.1496 [P = .0147], respectively); moreover, donor median creatinine serum concentration (P = .00004) and cold ischemia time (P = .00019) are related to delayed graft function. BMI did not influence the incidence of DGF (P = .08, OR; 1.167; 95% CI, 0.562-2.409), the number of AR episodes (P > .1; OR, 1.745; 95% CI, 0.846-3.575), number of reoperations, GFR (P = .22-.92), or creatinine concentration (P = .09). Number of graft losses (P = .12; OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.770-4.184) or patient deaths (P = .216; OR, 3.69; 95% CI, 0.153-36.444) were not influenced. CONCLUSION: Greater recipient BMI at the time of transplantation has a significant influence on the incidence of primary graft failure.