Biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 vs. insulin glargine in insulin naïve type 2 diabetes patients: modelling the long-term health economic implications in a Swedish setting.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term clinical and economic outcomes of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 (BIAsp 70/30) treatment vs. insulin glargine in insulin naïve, type 2 diabetes patients failing oral antidiabetic drugs in a Swedish setting. METHODS: A published and validated computer simulation model (the CORE Diabetes Model) was used to project life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) and costs over patient lifetimes. Cohort characteristics [54.5% male, mean age 52.4 years, 9 years mean diabetes duration, mean glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 9.77%] and treatment effects were based on results from the Initiate Insulin by Aggressive Titration and Education (INITIATE) clinical trial. Direct medical costs were accounted in 2006 Swedish Kronor (SEK) and economic and clinical benefits were discounted at 3% per annum. RESULTS: Biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 treatment when compared with insulin glargine treatment was associated with improvements in discounted life expectancy of 0.21 years (13.10 vs. 12.89 years) and QALE of 0.21 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (9.16 vs. 8.96 QALYs). Reductions in the incidence of diabetes-related complications in the BIAsp 70/30 treatment arm led to reduced total costs of SEK 10,367 when compared with insulin glargine (SEK 396,475 vs. SEK 406,842) over patient lifetimes. BIAsp 70/30 treatment was projected to be dominant (cost and lifesaving) when compared with insulin glargine in the base case analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 treatment was associated with improved clinical outcomes and reduced costs compared with insulin glargine treatment over patient lifetimes. These results were driven by improved HbA1c levels associated with BIAsp 70/30 compared with insulin glargine and the accompanying reduction in diabetes-related complications despite increases in body mass index.

Dose-response relation of liquid aerosol inhaled insulin in type I diabetic patients.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The AERx insulin Diabetes Management system (AERx iDMS) is a liquid aerosol device that enables insulin to be administered to the peripheral parts of the lung. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of insulin which is inhaled using AERx iDMS with insulin which is subcutaneously administered. METHODS: In total, 18 C-peptide negative patients with Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus participated in this randomised, open-label, 5-period crossover trial. Human regular insulin was administered subcutaneously (0.12 U/kg body weight) or inhaled by means of the AERx iDMS (dosages 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, and 1.8 U/kg body weight). Thereafter plasma glucose was kept constant at 7.2 mmol/l for a 10-h period (glucose clamp technique). RESULTS: Inhaled insulin provided a dose-response relation that was close to linear for both pharmacokinetic (AUC-Ins(0-10 h); Cmax-Ins) and pharmacodynamic (AUC-GIR(0-10 h); GIRmax) parameters. Time to maximum insulin concentration (Tmax-Ins) and time to maximum glucose infusion rate (TGIRmax) were shorter with inhaled insulin than with subcutaneous administration. The pharmacodynamic system efficiency of inhaled insulin (AUC-GIR(0-6 h) was 12.7% (95% C.I.: 10.2-15.6). CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: The inhalation of soluble human insulin using the AERx iDMS is feasible and provides a clear dose response. Further long-term studies are required to investigate safety aspects, HbA1c values, incidence of hypoglycaemic events and the quality of life.

Effects of intrapulmonary insulin in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes.

The effects of intrapulmonary insulin administration in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) were studied in 12 patients in a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled intervention study. Regular human insulin, 100 U ml-1, was given as an aerosol by oral inhalation after a 12-h fasting. A significant decrease in blood glucose concentration, from 10.2 +/- 0.5 to 6.1 +/- 0.5 mmol l-1 (p < 0.0001) and a significant rise in serum insulin concentration, from 11.2 +/- 1.8 to 28.0 +/- 2.6 mU ml-1 (p < 0.0001), was seen. Serum C-peptide levels decreased from 1.6 +/- 0.2 to 1.0 +/- 0.1 nmol l-1 (p < 0.0001). No side-effects were reported following aerosol inhalation. If similar results can be obtained when using this route for insulin administration to insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients, this may be a useful complement to traditional subcutaneous insulin injections in these patients.

Intrapulmonary administration of insulin to healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: To study the biological effects of nebulized insulin, administered intrapulmonary, to healthy volunteers. DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, controlled intervention study. SETTING: The department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden. SUBJECTS: Eight healthy, non-smoking volunteers, with a mean age of 28 (range 22 to 56) years. INTERVENTIONS: Regular human insulin 100 U mL-1 (Actrapid) or 0.9% saline was given randomly as an oral inhalation. Insulin was given in three different doses (40, 80 and 160 U). Aerosol was generated by a new jet nebulizer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood glucose, serum insulin, and serum C-peptide. RESULTS: After the 160 U insulin dose the blood glucose concentration (mean +/- SE) fell from 4.3 +/- 0.2 to 2.8 +/- 0.2 mmol L-1 (P < 0.001), concomitant with an increase in mean serum insulin concentrations, rising from 9.5 +/- 1.5 to 26.1 +/- 2.5 mU L-1 (P < 0.001). Serum C-peptide concentrations simultaneously decreased from 0.48 +/- 0.03 to 0.12 +/- 0.02 mmol L-1 (P < 0.001). All changes were dose dependent. No adverse reactions were noted and no significant changes in lung function tests. CONCLUSIONS: Intrapulmonary insulin administration to healthy subjects can induce a significant hypoglycaemia and cause a clinically relevant increase in serum insulin concentrations. If similar results can be obtained when administering insulin to diabetic subjects, this insulin administration route can be a future complement to certain groups of patients.

An exploration of intrapulmonary insulin administration in anaesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs.

We investigated the efficacy of intrapulmonary administration of short-acting porcine insulin in anaesthetized pigs (n = 14) in a randomized intervention study. Insulin was administered by a new jet nebulizer (Maxin) in a random order at different doses, 0 (saline), 10 or 40 U. The hypoglycaemic effect was compared to control (0.9% saline). Blood glucose and serum insulin concentrations were followed at specified time intervals for 90 min. Plasma catecholamine concentrations were measured in order to estimate the concurrent stress. Nebulized insulin caused a significant decrease in blood glucose concentrations (p < 0.0001) (n = 28) at all doses used. The decrease in mean blood glucose concentration from the start of nebulization was 39 +/- 3% (mean +/- SEM), falling from 4.6 +/- 0.1 to 2.8 +/- 0.2 mmol 1(-1), with a nadir at 40 min after the 40 U insulin dose (n = 10). Serum insulin concentration rose from (mean +/- SEM) 5.2 +/- 0.1 to 25 +/- 9 mU 1(-1) after the insulin dose of 40 U (n = 10), the peak value occurred at 30 min. The plasma catecholamine concentrations increased significantly (p < 0.0001) (n = 28) from 0 to 60 min, this increase was similar for control and for different insulin doses. We conclude that intrapulmonary administration of insulin can cause a significant decrease in blood glucose concentrations in anaesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs and results in clinically relevant serum insulin levels. Similar effects in humans would make inhaled insulin possible for clinical use.