Regenerative responses of rabbit corneal endothelial cells to stimulation by fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1) derivatives, TTHX1001 and TTHX1114.

Utilising rabbit corneal endothelial cells (CEC) in three different paradigms, two human FGF1 derivatives (TTHX1001 and TTHX1114), engineered to exhibit greater stability, were tested as proliferative agents. Primary CECs and mouse NIH 3T3 cells treated with the two FGF1 derivatives showed equivalent EC50 ranges (3.3-24 vs.1.9-16. ng/mL) and, in organ culture, chemically lesioned corneas regained half of the lost endothelial layer in three days after treatment with the FGF1 derivatives as compared to controls. In vivo, following cryolesioning, the CEC monolayer, as judged by specular microscopy, regenerated 10-11 days faster when treated with TTHX1001. Over two weeks, all treated eyes showed clearing of opacity about twice that of untreated controls. In all three rabbit models, both FGF1 derivatives were effective in inducing CEC proliferation over control conditions, supporting the prediction that these stabilised FGF1 derivatives can potentially regenerate corneal endothelial deficits in humans.

Proliferation of Human Corneal Endothelia in Organ Culture Stimulated by Wounding and the Engineered Human Fibroblast Growth Factor 1 Derivative TTHX1114.

Purpose: Corneal endothelial dystrophies are characterized by endothelial cell loss and dysfunction. Recent evidence suggests that corneal endothelial cells (CECs) can regenerate although they do not do so under normal conditions. This work sought to test whether CECs can be stimulated to proliferate in organ culture by wounding and/or by treatment with the engineered human fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1) derivative TTHX1114. Methods: Human donor corneas obtained from eye banks were maintained in organ culture in the presence or absence of TTHX1114. Wounds in the corneas were created by quartering the corneas. The CEC monolayer was identified as a regular layer by Hoechst staining of the nuclear DNA with cell outlines delineated by immunohistochemical identification of ZO-1. Nuclei and nuclei incorporating 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) were counted using ImageJ. Results: CECs in normal corneas in undisturbed monolayers had low, but measurable, rates of proliferation. CECs at the edge of a wound had higher rates of proliferation, probably due to the release of contact inhibition. TTHX1114 increased proliferation at wound edges. After 7 days of culture, proliferating CECs formed contiguous groups of labeled cells that did not migrate away from one another. TTHX1114-treated cells, including the EdU labeled proliferating cells, retained normal morphology, including cell/cell junction ZO-1 staining. Conclusions: Proliferation of CECs in organ-cultured corneas is low, but can be stimulated by wounding or by the administration of TTHX1114 with the effects of each being additive. The CEC monolayer appears to have a population of progenitor cells that are susceptible to stimulation.