Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 81(3): 169-76, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22627068

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Two detailed checklists were developed, based on published infection control guidelines, for daily use by infection control practitioners in departments and operating rooms. AIM: To assess the impact of the checklists on nosocomial infection rates in three hospitals over the course of one year. METHODS: The checklists included 20 subheadings (± 150 items). Project nurses conducted rounds in the study (but not control) departments; during each round, the nurses selected 15-20 items for observation, marked the checklists according to appropriateness of observed behaviour and provided on-the-spot corrective education. Rates of adherence to the checklist, antibiotic use, number of obtained and positive cultures, and positive staff hand and patient environment cultures were reported monthly as a report card to relevant personnel and administrators. The rate of nosocomial infections was determined in the first and last months. RESULTS: The baseline nosocomial infection rate was similar in the study and control departments: 37/345 (11%) and 26/270 (10%) respectively. In the last month, the rate in the study department decreased to 16/383 (4%) (P<0.01); in the control it decreased insignificantly to 21/248 (8%) (not significant). No significant trends were detected in the number of obtained cultures, positive cultures, or antibiotic use. Adherence to guidelines ranged from 75% to 94% between the hospitals (P<0.001): the overall rate increased from 80% to 91% (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The use of checklists during the conduct of infection control rounds, combined with monthly reports, was associated with a significant decrease in nosocomial infections in study departments.


Asunto(s)
Lista de Verificación/estadística & datos numéricos , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Adhesión a Directriz , Control de Infecciones/normas , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Bacterias Gramnegativas/clasificación , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Bacterias Grampositivas/clasificación , Bacterias Grampositivas/aislamiento & purificación , Desinfección de las Manos/normas , Hospitales/normas , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Profesionales para Control de Infecciones
2.
J Hosp Infect ; 62(2): 230-6, 2006 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16307825

RESUMEN

We conducted surveys in 1997 and 2002 to determine the rate, underlying sources and outcome of nosocomial bacteraemia. Blood culture results were reviewed daily. All patients with positive cultures drawn >or=48 h after hospitalization were included in the study and their charts were reviewed. The underlying source of infection was determined by pre-defined clinical and/or microbiological criteria. Patients were followed until discharge or death. In 1997 and 2002, 851 and 857 patient-unique cases of bacteraemia were diagnosed, respectively, excluding contaminants; of these, 228 (27%) and 277 (32%) cases, respectively, were hospital acquired (P<0.05). The overall rate decreased from 7.5 to 7.0 per 1,000 admissions (P<0.001). The sources of bacteraemia in 1997 and 2002, respectively, were: intravascular catheters (36% and 27%, P<0.05), urinary tract (8% and 15%, P<0.05), respiratory tract (5% and 13%, P<0.01) and surgical sites (14% and 4%, P<0.001). In one-third of patients, the source of bacteraemia could not be determined. Only 52% and 54%, respectively, of these patients were discharged alive (difference was not significant). In 1997, Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequent isolate (26%), followed by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (13%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (11%). By 2002, the incidence of S. aureus had fallen to 11% (P<0.001), acinetobacter was the single most frequently isolated organism (increased from 6% to 17%) (P<0.001). In-hospital mortality associated with acinetobacter bacteraemia (57%) was significantly higher than that for other organisms (31-43%) (P<0.05). In conclusion, prospective surveys of nosocomial bacteraemias provide valuable information, facilitating the pursuit of successful interventions.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Hospitales Universitarios , Acinetobacter/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/epidemiología , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/microbiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia/etiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Israel/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
QJM ; 89(12): 933-41, 1996 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9015487

RESUMEN

In the period 1988-1993, 241 patients had Klebsiella bacteraemia at our medical centre. The annual number of patients with positive blood cultures increased from 306 in 1988 to 622 in 1993, representing a 4.5-6% positivity rate of drawn cultures. After E. coli, Klebsiella was the leading cause of Gram-negative bacteraemia. During this period, the absolute number of Klebsiella bacteraemia increased from 25 in 1988 to 84 in 1993; this represents a true increase in Klebsiellaa bacteraemia, from 6-7% of positive cultures in the late 1980s to 12-13% in more recent years. There were 210 cases with K. pneumoniae and 31 with K. oxytoca. A representative sample of 80 records was retrieved and subdivided into two groups: community-acquired Klebsiella bacteraemia (CAKB) vs. hospital-acquired Klebsiella bacteraemia (HAKB). Urinary tract infection was the underlying source of 58% of CAKB vs 28% of HAKB (p < 0.01); pneumonia occurred significantly more often in HAKB (25%) than in CAKB (7%) (p < 0.01). In HAKB, as compared to CAKB, serious manifestations of illness were more common, e.g. shock (65% vs. 37%, p < 0.046) and respiratory failure (45% vs. 20%, p < 0.046). Overall mortality was 32%, 22% of patients with CAKB died vs. 42% of those with HAKB (p < 0.05). Multiple drug resistance was very common: only 57% of all Klebsiella strains were susceptible to gentamicin, 66% to ceftriaxone, 70% to ciprofloxacin, and 83% to amikacin. The susceptibility rates of Klebsiella spp isolated from patients with HAKB were significantly lower (p < 0.001). Sepsis due to multiple-drug-resistant Klebsiellaa has become frequent, carrying significant morbidity and mortality. Restriction of broad-spectrum antimicrobials in the hospital and the community as well as implementation of infection control measures are needed to contain this problem.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/transmisión , Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad , Infecciones por Klebsiella/transmisión , Anciano , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Resistencia a Múltiples Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Israel , Klebsiella , Infecciones por Klebsiella/mortalidad , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Neumonía Bacteriana/transmisión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Infecciones Urinarias/transmisión
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA