The Alzheimer's Association Global Biomarker Standardization Consortium (GBSC) plasma phospho-tau Round Robin study.

BACKGROUND: Phosphorylated tau (p-tau) is a specific blood biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. Multiple p-tau biomarkers on several analytical platforms are poised for clinical use. The Alzheimer's Association Global Biomarker Standardisation Consortium plasma phospho-tau Round Robin study engaged assay developers in a blinded case-control study on plasma p-tau, aiming to learn which assays provide the largest fold-changes in AD compared to non-AD, have the strongest relationship between plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and show the most consistent relationships between methods (commutability) in measuring both patient samples and candidate reference materials (CRM). METHODS: Thirty-three different p-tau biomarker assays, built on eight different analytical platforms, were used to quantify paired plasma and CSF samples from 40 participants. AD biomarker status was categorised as "AD pathology" (n=25) and "non-AD pathology" (n=15) by CSF Aß42/Aß40 (US-FDA; CE-IVDR) and p-tau181 (CE-IVDR) methods. The commutability of four CRM, at three concentrations, was assessed across assays. FINDINGS: Plasma p-tau217 consistently demonstrated higher fold-changes between AD and non-AD pathology groups, compared to other p-tau epitopes. Fujirebio LUMIPULSE G, UGOT IPMS, and Lilly MSD p-tau217 assays provided the highest median fold-changes. In CSF, p-tau217 assays also performed best, and exhibited substantially larger fold-changes than their plasma counterparts, despite similar diagnostic performance. P-tau217 showed the strongest correlations between plasma assays (rho=0.81 to 0.97). Plasma p-tau levels were weakly-to-moderately correlated with CSF p-tau, and correlations were non-significant within the AD group alone. The evaluated CRM were not commutable across assays. INTERPRETATION: Plasma p-tau217 measures had larger fold-changes and discriminative accuracies for detecting AD pathology, and better agreement across platforms than other plasma p-tau variants. Plasma and CSF markers of p-tau, measured by immunoassays, are not substantially correlated, questioning the interchangeability of their continuous relationship. Further work is warranted to understand the pathophysiology underlying this dissociation, and to develop suitable reference materials facilitating cross-assay standardisation. FUNDING: Alzheimer's Association (#ADSF-24-1284328-C).

Effects of time of the day at sampling on CSF and plasma levels of Alzheimer' disease biomarkers.

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of amyloid-ß (Aß)42 and Aß40 present a circadian rhythm. However sustained sampling of large volumes of CSF with indwelling intrathecal catheters used in most of these studies might have affected CSF dynamics and thereby confounded the observed fluctuations in the biomarker levels. METHODS: We included 38 individuals with either normal (N = 20) or abnormal (N = 18) CSF Aß42/Aß40 levels at baseline. CSF and plasma were collected at two visits separated by an average of 53 days with lumbar punctures and venipunctures performed either in the morning or evening. At the first visit, sample collection was performed in the morning for 17 participants and the order was reversed for the remaining 21 participants. CSF and plasma samples were analyzed for Alzheimer' disease (AD) biomarkers, including Aß42, Aß40, GFAP, NfL p-tau181, p-tau217, p-tau231 and t-tau. CSF samples were also tested using mass spectrometry for 22 synaptic and endo-lysosomal proteins. RESULTS: CSF Aß42 (mean difference [MD], 0.21 ng/mL; p = 0.038), CSF Aß40 (MD, 1.85 ng/mL; p < 0.001), plasma Aß42 (MD, 1.65 pg/mL; p = 0.002) and plasma Aß40 (MD, 0.01 ng/mL, p = 0.002) were increased by 4.2-17.0% in evening compared with morning samples. Further, CSF levels of 14 synaptic and endo-lysosomal proteins, including neurogranin and neuronal pentraxin-1, were increased by 4.5-13.3% in the evening samples (MDrange, 0.02-0.56 fmol/µl; p < 0.042). However, no significant differences were found between morning and evening levels for the Aß42/Aß40 ratio, different p-tau variants, GFAP and NfL. There were no significant interaction between sampling time and Aß status for any of the biomarkers, except that CSF t-tau was increased (by 5.74%) in the evening samples compared to the morning samples in Aß-positive (MD, 16.46 ng/ml; p = 0.009) but not Aß-negative participants (MD, 1.89 ng/ml; p = 0.47). There were no significant interactions between sampling time and order in which samples were obtained. DISCUSSION: Our findings provide evidence for diurnal fluctuations in Aß peptide levels, both in CSF and plasma, while CSF and plasma p-tau, GFAP and NfL were unaffected. Importantly, Aß42/Aß40 ratio remained unaltered, suggesting that it is more suitable for implementation in clinical workup than individual Aß peptides. Additionally, we show that CSF levels of many synaptic and endo-lysosomal proteins presented a diurnal rhythm, implying a build-up of neuronal activity markers during the day. These results will guide the development of unified sample collection procedures to avoid effects of diurnal variation for future implementation of AD biomarkers in clinical practice and drug trials.

Optimized Pre-analytical Handling Protocol for Blood-Based Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease.

The therapeutic management of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been hindered by poor diagnostic accuracy. As such, there is an unmet clinical need for tools that can detect and diagnose the disease in its early stages. Compared with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-based biomarkers or positron emission tomography (PET), the use of reliable blood-based biomarkers could offer an accessible and minimally invasive method of streamlining diagnosis in the clinical setting. However, the influence of pre-analytical processing and sample handling parameters on the accurate measurement of protein biomarkers is well established, especially for AD CSF-based biomarkers. In this chapter, we provide recommendations for an optimal sample handling protocol for the analysis of blood-based biomarkers specifically for amyloid pathology in AD.

The potential clinical value of plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Many people with cognitive complaints or impairment never receive an accurate diagnosis of the underlying condition, potentially impacting their access to appropriate treatment. To address this unmet need, plasma biomarker tests are being developed for use in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Plasma biomarker tests span various stages of development, including in vitro diagnostic devices (or tests) (IVDs), laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) and research use only devices (or tests) (RUOs). Understanding the differences between each test type is important for appropriate implementation into the AD diagnostic pathway and care continuum. METHODS: Authors reviewed scientific literature (PubMed, meeting abstracts and presentations, company press releases and websites) on AD plasma biomarkers. RESULTS: This article defines IVDs, LDTs, and RUOs, discusses potential clinical applications and highlights the steps necessary for their clinical implementation. DISCUSSION: Plasma biomarkers could revolutionize many areas of the AD diagnostic pathway and care continuum, but further research is needed. HIGHLIGHTS: There is a need for a minimally invasive Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnostic tool. AD plasma biomarker tests exist at various stages of commercial development. Understanding the development stage of a test is important for its appropriate use. Plasma biomarker tests could function as a triage tool to streamline AD diagnosis. Further steps remain before AD plasma biomarkers can be used routinely.

Impact of pre-analytical sample handling factors on plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease.

An unmet need exists for reliable plasma biomarkers of amyloid pathology, in the clinical laboratory setting, to streamline diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). For routine clinical use, a biomarker must provide robust and reliable results under pre-analytical sample handling conditions. We investigated the impact of different pre-analytical sample handling procedures on the levels of seven plasma biomarkers in development for potential routine use in AD. Using (1) fresh (never frozen) and (2) previously frozen plasma, we evaluated the effects of (A) storage time and temperature, (B) freeze/thaw (F/T) cycles, (C) anticoagulants, (D) tube transfer, and (E) plastic tube types. Blood samples were prospectively collected from patients with cognitive impairment undergoing investigation in a memory clinic. ß-amyloid 1-40 (Aß40), ß-amyloid 1-42 (Aß42), apolipoprotein E4, glial fibrillary acidic protein, neurofilament light chain, phosphorylated-tau (phospho-tau) 181, and phospho-tau-217 were measured using Elecsys® plasma prototype immunoassays. Recovery signals for each plasma biomarker and sample handling parameter were calculated. For all plasma biomarkers measured, pre-analytical effects were comparable between fresh (never frozen) and previously frozen samples. All plasma biomarkers tested were stable for ≤24 h at 4°C when stored as whole blood and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) plasma. Recovery signals were acceptable for up to five tube transfers, or two F/T cycles, and in both polypropylene and low-density polyethylene tubes. For all plasma biomarkers except Aß42 and Aß40, analyte levels were largely comparable between EDTA, lithium heparin, and sodium citrate tubes. Aß42 and Aß40 were most sensitive to pre-analytical handling, and the effects could only be partially compensated by the Aß42/Aß40 ratio. We provide recommendations for an optimal sample handling protocol for analysis of plasma biomarkers for amyloid pathology AD, to improve the reproducibility of future studies on plasma biomarkers assays and for potential use in routine clinical practice.

Clinical performance and robustness evaluation of plasma amyloid-ß42/40 prescreening.

INTRODUCTION: Further evidence is needed to support the use of plasma amyloid ß (Aß) biomarkers as Alzheimer's disease prescreening tools. This study evaluated the clinical performance and robustness of plasma Aß42 /Aß40 for amyloid positivity prescreening. METHODS: Data were collected from 333 BioFINDER and 121 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study participants. Risk and predictive values versus percentile of plasma Aß42 /Aß40 evaluated the actionability of plasma Aß42 /Aß40 , and simulations modeled the impact of potential uncertainties and biases. Amyloid PET was the brain amyloidosis reference standard. RESULTS: Elecsys plasma Aß42 /Aß40 could potentially rule out amyloid pathology in populations with low-to-moderate amyloid positivity prevalence. However, simulations showed small measurement or pre-analytical errors in Aß42 and/or Aß40 cause misclassifications, impacting sensitivity or specificity. The minor fold change between amyloid PET positive and negative cases explains the biomarkers low robustness. DISCUSSION: Implementing plasma Aß42 /Aß40 for routine clinical use may pose significant challenges, with misclassification risks. HIGHLIGHTS: Plasma Aß42 /Aß40 ruled out amyloid PET positivity in a setting of low amyloid-positive prevalence. Including (pre-) analytical errors or measurement biases caused misclassifications. Plasma Aß42 /Aß40 had a low inherent dynamic range, independent of analytical method. Other blood biomarkers may be easier to implement as robust prescreening tools.

An accurate fully automated panel of plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease.

INTRODUCTION: There is a great need for fully automated plasma assays that can measure amyloid beta (Aß) pathology and predict future Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia. METHODS: Two cohorts (n = 920) were examined: Panel A+ (n = 32 cognitively unimpaired [CU], n = 106 mild cognitive impairment [MCI], and n = 89 AD) and BioFINDER-1 (n = 461 CU, n = 232 MCI). Plasma Aß42/Aß40, phosphorylated tau (p-tau)181, two p-tau217 variants, ApoE4 protein, neurofilament light, and GFAP were measured using Elecsys prototype immunoassays. RESULTS: The best biomarker for discriminating Aß-positive versus Aß-negative participants was Aß42/Aß40 (are under the curve [AUC] 0.83-0.87). Combining Aß42/Aß40, p-tau181, and ApoE4 improved the AUCs significantly (0.90 to 0.93; P< 0.01). Adding additional biomarkers had marginal effects (ΔAUC ≤0.01). In BioFINDER, p-tau181, p-tau217, and ApoE4 predicted AD dementia within 6 years in CU (AUC 0.88) and p-tau181, p-tau217, and Aß42/Aß40 in MCI (AUC 0.87). DISCUSSION: The high accuracies for Aß pathology and future AD dementia using fully automated instruments are promising for implementing plasma biomarkers in clinical trials and clinical routine.

Diagnostic performance of automated plasma amyloid-ß assays combined with pre-analytical immunoprecipitation.

BACKGROUND: Measurements of the amyloid-ß (Aß) 42/40 ratio in blood plasma may support the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and aid in the selection of suitable participants in clinical trials. Here, we compared the diagnostic performance of fully automated prototype plasma Aß42/40 assays with and without pre-analytical sample workup by immunoprecipitation. METHODS: A pre-selected clinical sample comprising 42 subjects with normal and 38 subjects with low cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aß42/40 ratios was studied. The plasma Aß42/40 ratios were determined with fully automated prototype Elecsys® immunoassays (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany) by direct measurements in EDTA plasma or after pre-analytical Aß immunoprecipitation. The diagnostic performance for the detection of abnormal CSF Aß42/40 was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. In an additional post hoc analysis, a biomarker-supported clinical diagnosis was used as a second endpoint. RESULTS: Pre-analytical immunoprecipitation resulted in a significant increase in the area under the ROC curve (AUC) from 0.73 to 0.88 (p = 0.01547) for identifying subjects with abnormal CSF Aß42/40. A similar improvement in the diagnostic performance by pre-analytical immunoprecipitation was also observed when a biomarker-supported clinical diagnosis was used as a second endpoint (AUC increase from 0.77 to 0.92, p = 0.01576). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary observations indicate that pre-analytical Aß immunoprecipitation can improve the diagnostic performance of plasma Aß assays for detecting brain amyloid pathology. The findings may aid in the further development of blood-based immunoassays for Alzheimer's disease ultimately suitable for screening and routine use.

Test-retest variability of plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease and its effects on clinical prediction models.

INTRODUCTION: The effect of random error on the performance of blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) must be determined before clinical implementation. METHODS: We measured test-retest variability of plasma amyloid beta (Aß)42/Aß40, neurofilament light (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and phosphorylated tau (p-tau)217 and simulated effects of this variability on biomarker performance when predicting either cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aß status or conversion to AD dementia in 399 non-demented participants with cognitive symptoms. RESULTS: Clinical performance was highest when combining all biomarkers. Among single-biomarkers, p-tau217 performed best. Test-retest variability ranged from 4.1% (Aß42/Aß40) to 25% (GFAP). This variability reduced the performance of the biomarkers (≈ΔAUC [area under the curve] -1% to -4%) with the least effects on models with p-tau217. The percent of individuals with unstable predicted outcomes was lowest for the multi-biomarker combination (14%). DISCUSSION: Clinical prediction models combining plasma biomarkers-particularly p-tau217-exhibit high performance and are less effected by random error. Individuals with unstable predicted outcomes ("gray zone") should be recommended for further tests.

Survey of ex vivo drug combination effects in chronic lymphocytic leukemia reveals synergistic drug effects and genetic dependencies.

Drug combinations that target critical pathways are a mainstay of cancer care. To improve current approaches to combination treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and gain insights into the underlying biology, we studied the effect of 352 drug combination pairs in multiple concentrations by analysing ex vivo drug response of 52 primary CLL samples, which were characterized by "omics" profiling. Known synergistic interactions were confirmed for B-cell receptor (BCR) inhibitors with Bcl-2 inhibitors and with chemotherapeutic drugs, suggesting that this approach can identify clinically useful combinations. Moreover, we uncovered synergistic interactions between BCR inhibitors and afatinib, which we attribute to BCR activation by afatinib through BLK upstream of BTK and PI3K. Combinations of multiple inhibitors of BCR components (e.g., BTK, PI3K, SYK) had effects similar to the single agents. While PI3K and BTK inhibitors produced overall similar effects in combinations with other drugs, we uncovered a larger response heterogeneity of combinations including PI3K inhibitors, predominantly in CLL with mutated IGHV, which we attribute to the target's position within the BCR-signaling pathway. Taken together, our study shows that drug combination effects can be effectively queried in primary cancer cells, which could aid discovery, triage and clinical development of drug combinations.