Asia can afford universal access for AIDS prevention and treatment.

This paper draws on published reports, data from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria and the Asian Development Bank, and analysis by the Commission on AIDS in Asia to estimate financial resources required to achieve universal access for HIV in low-income and middle-income countries of Asia. It explores optimal use of available resources to mount effective response to AIDS in Asia against an uncertain economic climate. Although there is global commitment to tackle the HIV pandemic, available financing falls short of minimum requirements to achieve universal access to prevention and treatment. To support essential HIV priorities in Asia, the Commission on AIDS in Asia estimated annual resource needs to be US$ 3.1 billion. Yet, in 2007, according to one study, estimated total public spending on AIDS in 14 major Asian countries was only US$ 0.9 billion. Hence, scarce resources need to be carefully applied to address the concentrated HIV epidemics in Asia and achieve universal coverage by prioritizing investment in high-impact interventions to maximally avert new infections and deaths, intensifying multisectoral efforts through catalytic financing that mainstreams HIV interventions into existing services, particularly for low-impact prevention programs, and ensuring countries with growing economies mobilize increased amounts of domestic funding to match international financing.

Community involvement in health in Mongolia: hospital boards and other participatory structures.

Under the Soviet central planning model that operated until 1990, the Mongolian population had little or no involvement in decision-making about health care. As part of overall health sector reform in Mongolia, hospital boards have been established, with significant community representation, to guide strategic and financial management and to assist in developing services according to community needs and expectations. We discuss experiences, and steps taken to resolve initial problems. We also describe other more recent participatory models including the family group practice initiative which involves the community choosing their doctor, community management of revolving drug finds, establishment of community health volunteer networks, and the governments information campaign strategy on the reforms. The community participation models in Mongolia are part of an ongoing process of openness and emphasise the commitment to change in that country. We argue that these experiences have the potential to guide and inform similar measures in other transitional countries.