Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Bone Joint J ; 102-B(9): 1268, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32862692
2.
Bone Joint J ; 99-B(11): 1526-1532, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29092994

RESUMEN

AIMS: This 501-patient, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial sought to establish the effect of low-intensity, pulsed, ultrasound (LIPUS) on tibial shaft fractures managed with intramedullary nailing. We conducted an economic evaluation as part of this trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data for patients' use of post-operative healthcare resources and time taken to return to work were collected and costed using publicly available sources. Health-related quality of life, assessed using the Health Utilities Index Mark-3 (HUI-3), was used to derive quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs and QALYs were compared between LIPUS and control (a placebo device) from a payer and societal perspective using non-parametric bootstrapping. All costs are reported in 2015 Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated. RESULTS: With a cost per device of $3,995, the mean cost was significantly higher for patients treated with LIPUS versus placebo from a payer (mean increase = $3647, 95% confidence interval (CI) $3244 to $4070; p < 0.001) or a societal perspective (mean increase = $3425, 95% CI $1568 to $5283; p < 0.001). LIPUS did not provide a significant benefit in terms of QALYs gained (mean difference = 0.023 QALYs, 95% CI -0.035 to 0.069; p = 0.474). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of LIPUS compared with placebo were $155 433/QALY from a payer perspective and $146 006/QALY from a societal perspective. CONCLUSION: At the current price, LIPUS is not cost-effective for fresh tibial fractures managed with intramedullary nailing. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1526-32.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Fracturas de la Tibia/terapia , Terapia por Ultrasonido/economía , Ondas Ultrasónicas , Adulto , Anciano , Canadá , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Económicos , Estudios Prospectivos , Fracturas de la Tibia/economía , Terapia por Ultrasonido/métodos
3.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 14(3): 278-87, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22519518

RESUMEN

Expansion of the donor pool may lead to utilization of donors with risk factors for viral infections. Donor laboratory screening relies on serological and nucleic acid testing (NAT). The increased sensitivity of NAT in low prevalence populations may result in false-positive results (FPR) and may cause unnecessary discard of organs.We developed a screening algorithm to deal, in real time, with potential FPR. Three NAT assays: COBAS AmpliScreen assay (CAS), AmpliPrep Total Nucleic Acid Isolation/CAS, and AmpliPrep/TaqMan assays, were validated and used in parallel for prospective screening of increased-risk donors (IRD), and the probability of FPR was calculated. The lower limit of detection of this algorithm was 9.79, 21.02, and 4.31 IU/mL for human immunodeficiency virus-1, hepatitis C virus, and hepatitis B virus, respectively, with an average turn-around-time of 7.67 h from sample receipt to result reporting. The probability that a donor is potentially infectious with two NAT concordant results was >90%. NAT screening of 35 IRD within 18 months resulted in transplantation of 102 additional organs that without screening would either not be used or used with restrictions in Australia. Using a parallel testing algorithm, real-time confirmation of seropositive donors allows use of organs from IRD and safer expansion of the donor pool.


Asunto(s)
Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Selección de Donante/métodos , Técnicas de Amplificación de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Donantes de Tejidos , Algoritmos , Australia , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Eur J Pharm Sci ; 8(2): 147-52, 1999 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10210738

RESUMEN

The influence of drug solubility in the range 14.3-1000 gl-1 on the formation of pellets by extrusion and spheronisation has been investigated by evaluating the performance of a series of model drugs mixed with an equal part by weight of microcrystalline cellulose. The optimum formulation in terms of pellet roundness and the maximum quantity within a limited size range was established by preparing samples with a range of water levels. The range of water levels over which pellets could be formed was found to be dependent on the model drug and its particle size. In general the force necessary to extrude the wet mass through the ram extruder was found to decrease as the quantity of water added increased. The optimum water level required to form the best quality pellets was found to decrease as a linear function of the natural logarithm of the water solubility of the drug. If allowance is made for the loss of solid by dissolution of the drug, there is an increase in the apparent water content necessary to form good spheres above a critical solubility between 350 and 400 gl-1.


Asunto(s)
Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/análisis , Agua/análisis , Celulosa , Composición de Medicamentos , Microesferas , Tamaño de la Partícula , Solubilidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...