RESUMEN
There is dire need for an effective and affordable vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 to tackle the ongoing pandemic. In this study, we describe a modular virus-like particle vaccine candidate displaying the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein receptor-binding domain (RBD) using SpyTag/SpyCatcher technology (RBD-SpyVLP). Low doses of RBD-SpyVLP in a prime-boost regimen induced a strong neutralising antibody response in mice and pigs that was superior to convalescent human sera. We evaluated antibody quality using ACE2 blocking and neutralisation of cell infection by pseudovirus or wild-type SARS-CoV-2. Using competition assays with a monoclonal antibody panel, we showed that RBD-SpyVLP induced a polyclonal antibody response that recognised all key epitopes on the RBD, reducing the likelihood of selecting neutralisation-escape mutants. The induction of potent and polyclonal antibody responses by RBD-SpyVLP provides strong potential to address clinical and logistic challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, RBD-SpyVLP is highly resilient, thermostable and can be lyophilised without losing immunogenicity, to facilitate global distribution and reduce cold-chain dependence.
RESUMEN
SARS-CoV-2 emerged in late 2019, leading to the COVID-19 pandemic that continues to cause significant global mortality in human populations. Given its sequence similarity to SARS-CoV, as well as related coronaviruses circulating in bats, SARS-CoV-2 is thought to have originated in Chiroptera species in China. However, whether the virus spread directly to humans or through an intermediate host is currently unclear, as is the potential for this virus to infect companion animals, livestock and wildlife that could act as viral reservoirs. Using a combination of surrogate entry assays and live virus we demonstrate that, in addition to human ACE2, the Spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 has a broad host tropism for mammalian ACE2 receptors, despite divergence in the amino acids at the Spike receptor binding site on these proteins. Of the twenty-two different hosts we investigated, ACE2 proteins from dog, cat and rabbit were the most permissive to SARS-CoV-2, while bat and bird ACE2 proteins were the least efficiently used receptors. The absence of a significant tropism for any of the three genetically distinct bat ACE2 proteins we examined indicates that SARS-CoV-2 receptor usage likely shifted during zoonotic transmission from bats into people, possibly in an intermediate reservoir. Interestingly, while SARS-CoV-2 pseudoparticle entry was inefficient in cells bearing the ACE2 receptor from bats or birds the live virus was still able to enter these cells, albeit with markedly lower efficiency. The apparently broad tropism of SARS-CoV-2 at the point of viral entry confirms the potential risk of infection to a wide range of companion animals, livestock and wildlife.
RESUMEN
The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of indapamide 1.25 mg once daily as monotherapy in elderly patients (65 years and older) with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Two hundred and seventy-nine (279) elderly patients were enrolled in a washout period, during which patients received single-blind placebo for 4 weeks. Patients demonstrating supine diastolic pressures between 95 mm Hg and 114 mm Hg at the end of the 4-week placebo washout period were entered into the 8-week double-blind treatment period. Two hundred and four (204) patients qualified for the study and were randomized to the double-blind treatment; 103 patients received indapamide 1.25 mg and 101 patients received placebo for 8 weeks. Overall, 177 patients (92 indapamide and 85 placebo) completed the study. The primary efficacy criterion was the mean change in supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from double-blind baseline to the end of 8 weeks of therapy. By week 8 of the double-blind treatment period, indapamide 1.25 mg produced a statistically significant (P = 0.0037) decrease in supine DBP of 8.2 mm Hg compared to a decrease of 5.3 mm Hg produced in the placebo group. Additionally, indapamide 1.25 mg was statistically (P = 0.0028) more effective than placebo in reducing supine systolic BP (SBP) (-10.1 vs -4.2 mm Hg). The incidence of drug-related adverse events during the double-blind treatment period was similar between the two treatment groups. A low dose of indapamide, 1.25 mg, given once daily for 8 weeks was effective as monotherapy with respect to BP reduction in an elderly population with mild to moderate hypertension. Indapamide 1.25 mg was safe and generally well tolerated in this elderly patient population.
