The optimal stimulus to elicit suppression in small-angle convergent strabismus.

PURPOSE: To determine the optimal stimulus duration as well as the most appropriate luminance profile to elicit suppression in small-angle convergent strabismus. METHODS: In 10 subjects with small-angle convergent strabismus, using a device allowing binocular viewing and peripheral fusion, we determined what the optimal stimulus would be to elicit suppression. Three control subjects were also included in the study. Stimuli were shown randomly in the central 3 degrees of the visual field of either eye. Stimulus durations were varied in seven steps from 50 to 1000 ms and three luminance-time profiles were used: square wave, triangle and half-sinus, thus yielding 21 different stimuli. The peak light intensity was the same for all stimuli. RESULTS: Suppression, defined as the difference in the threshold sensitivities under monocular vs. binocular viewing, was found with our test device in five of the ten subjects, and ranged between 3 and 33 dB. Suppression was deepest with triangular or half-sinusoidal stimuli of 400 ms duration. Square wave stimuli elicited the smallest amount of suppression. CONCLUSION: Stimuli with a gradual increment and decrement, like triangular or half-sinusoidal stimuli, with a duration of 400 ms are the most effective to elicit suppression

Quantitative visual fields under binocular viewing conditions in primary and consecutive divergent strabismus.

BACKGROUND: Although there have been a number of studies on the size of the suppression scotoma in divergent strabismus, there have been no reports on the full extent (i.e. size as well as depth) of this scotoma. METHODS: Binocular static perimetry was used to measure suppression scotomas in five patients with primary divergent strabismus and ten patients with consecutive divergent strabismus. Four control subjects were also included in the study. With two modified Friedmann visual field analysers, we measured the visual field of both eyes under monocular and binocular viewing conditions. The objective angle of squint ranged from 3 degrees to 25 degrees. Best corrected visual acuity was at least 0.4, but mostly 1.0 in both eyes. RESULTS: All subjects had normal visual fields for each eye under monocular viewing conditions. In 12 of the 15 subjects, we found a large area of suppression encompassing the projection of the fixation point as well as that of the fovea in the non-fixating eye under binocular viewing conditions. In 2 of these 12 patients, one with primary and one with consecutive divergent strabismus, the area of suppression was located nasally to the position of the fovea in the field of the non-fixating eye (nasal hemisuppression). In another two patients with divergent squint combined with vertical deviation, a small fixation-point suppression scotoma was found. The depth of suppression ranged from 3 dB to 16 dB. In one subject only, no suppression was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the shape of the suppression scotoma is not related to the origin of divergent strabismus or to the angle of squint. Our results also indicate that the critical age for the development of suppression in divergent squint might be up to 14 years.

Quantitative perimetry under binocular viewing conditions in microstrabismus.

In order to elucidate the type, size and depth of suppression scotomata in microstrabismus and small angle convergent strabismus, we performed binocular static perimetry in 14 subjects with strabismus and four normal observers. The strabismic cases had an objective angle of convergent squint between 1 and 8 deg, visual acuity between 0.1 and 1.25, and limited stereopsis. During testing the subjects fused pictures on two Friedmann visual field analyzers. Right and left eyes were studied separately under both monocular and binocular viewing conditions. In five strabismics a suppression scotoma was found in the squinting eye, with a diameter of 5-30 deg and a depth ranging from 4 to 14 dB. No suppression scotomata could be detected in the nine other subjects nor in the four normal observers. In conclusion, only 36% of subjects with strabismus were found to have a suppression scotoma. These scotomata were centered around the fixation point of the squinting eye, in some cases also encompassing the foveal area, and varying in depth and size.

[Cortical blindness during treatment with cyclosporin]. / Corticale blindheid tijdens behandeling met ciclosporine.

A 40-year-old man developed cortical blindness during cyclosporin treatment shortly after an allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukaemia. At that time the patient had a therapeutic cyclosporin blood level (226 ng/ml), but a low serum magnesium level and a marginally decreased serum cholesterol level. In addition the patient had hypertension, headache and paraesthesia in the oral, palmar and plantar areas. Vision was fully recovered after discontinuation of the cyclosporin treatment and correction of the hypomagnesaemia. Eighteen cases of cortical blindness during cyclosporin treatment are now known in the literature. Hypomagnesaemia appears to be implicated in the pathogenesis.

Pseudophakic endophthalmitis.

We performed a retrospective study on 45 patients admitted to the Rotterdam Eye Hospital and the Ophthalmic Department of the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam with pseudophakic endophthalmitis. Vitreous loss during cataract extraction was associated with a significantly increased risk of postoperative endophthalmitis when compared with uncomplicated cataract extraction (p < 0.0001). The incidence of pseudophakic endophthalmitis in diabetic patients was not significantly higher as compared to non-diabetic patients. Vitrectomy in the treatment of postoperative endophthalmitis did not improve the final visual acuity, probably because of selection bias. Methicillin and cephazolin, used intravitreally against gram-positive organisms, failed to provide a good coverage for endophthalmitis due to Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Endophthalmitis: incidence, therapy and visual outcome in the period 1983-1992 in the Rotterdam Eye Hospital.

From 1983 to 1992, 134 patients were treated for clinically suspected endophthalmitis. 61% of this endophthalmitis population consisted of cases that were referred to our clinic. In this nine year period antibiotic treatment was carried out according to three consecutively used guidelines. These three treatment schemes differed in antibiotic spectrum and mode of antibiotic delivery. In 68 patients we performed vitrectomy on account of clinical deterioration under antibiotic treatment. We did not find significant differences in visual outcome between the three treatment groups. The incidence of endophthalmitis following cataract or vitreous surgery did not change throughout the study period. There was however a dramatic decrease in incidence of post-traumatic endophthalmitis following the introduction of a prophylactic antibiotic treatment scheme consisting of fortified gentamicin and cefazolin eyedrops, and intravenously and subconjunctivally administered gentamicin, cefazolin, and clindamycin. In 55 of 68 cases in which vitrectomy was performed in conjunction with intravitreal antibiotics, a vitreous or anterior chamber specimen was cultured. 36 patients had a positive culture result. In the group with positive culture result 42% had better visual acuity in the post-treatment period than before treatment. In the group with a sterile culture result 79% had better vision after treatment.

Accessory lateral rectus orbital geometry in normal and naturally strabismic monkeys.

We conducted anatomic dissections of macaque monkey orbits and made a quantitative assessment of the orbital geometry of the accessory lateral rectus muscle. Our results show that the expected effect of this muscle on rotations of the globe is to produce elevation and abduction. The abducting component could counteract nasal drifts, and thus our findings provide support for the hypothesis that this muscle could render monkeys resistant to the development of esodeviations. Dissections of the orbits from two naturally esotropic monkeys also are consistent with this hypothesis. The accessory lateral rectus muscle was absent in one of them and abnormally small in the other. Humans do not have an accessory lateral rectus muscle, and we speculate that the high prevalence of esodeviations in humans may be related to an evolutionary loss of this muscle system.

Visual fields of monocularly deprived macaque monkeys.

The effects of postnatal monocular deprivation have been studied in macaque monkeys using behavioral perimetry field testing. The types of deprivation were: (1) early eyelid suture at 22-26 days after birth and then reverse suture at 10-13 months postnatally, (2) late eyelid suture beginning at 3 or 5 months postnatally and continued for 18 months, and (3) long-term occlusion by contact lenses. Response levels were normal for group 1 monkeys with some reduction in visual field extent. A reduced response level but no change in visual field extent was observed for the deprived eyes of group 2 monkeys. One monkey from group 3 that wore an occluder lens from birth to 19 months postnatally had no responses in any part of the visual field. Two other monkeys of group 3, whose occlusion started at 9 or 12 days of age and lasted for 2 years, had no responses to stimuli presented to the previously occluded eyes in their nasal visual fields and had reduced levels of response to stimuli presented in their temporal fields. The results indicate that the effects of monocular deprivation on macaque monkeys are affected by the start, length and type of deprivation. Some of these results are also consistent with a model of binocular competition in which the magnitude of the competition declines along a nasal-to-temporal gradient of visual field eccentricity. However, a mechanism that is independent of binocular competition is needed to account for the loss of responses to stimuli presented in the monocular visual segment.