RESUMEN
Rotational atherectomy was introduced with a view to approaching percutaneously, cases that were suboptimal or unsuitable for conventional percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). In this article we present our findings for a period of two years starting in April 2001, when 60 procedures were performed on 54 patients. We found the procedure to be successful in B2 and C type lesions. It is our opinion that the lower burr-to-artery ratio used in our cases was significantly beneficial in decreasing immediate complications related to the procedure. Complimentary PTCA and stenting improved the angiographic end result. Using this strategy, we have achieved very acceptable clinical results.
Asunto(s)
Aterectomía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Anciano , Angina de Pecho/etiología , Angina de Pecho/mortalidad , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Aterectomía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Terapia Combinada , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
In a double-blind randomized trial, the hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects of the low-osmolar nonionic contrast medium iohexol (Omnipaque) and the standard high-osmolar ionic monomer sodium-meglumine-ioxithalamate (Telebrix) at left ventricular angiography and selective coronary arteriography were evaluated. Sixty patients were divided into two groups of 30 patients; one group received Omnipaque in a dosage of 350 mgI/ml and the other group received Telebrix in a dosage of 350 mgI/ml. The Omnipaque showed significantly less effects on heart rate and myocardial contractility, and induced less electrophysiological changes than did Telebrix. However, there was a significant increase of 10% in the diameter of the left coronary artery following selective coronary injection with Telebrix, while Omnipaque induced practically no change in vessel diameter. All hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects proved to be short-lasting. We conclude that ionic and nonionic agents are similarly efficacious in providing adequate images with minimal risk to the patient. However, the nonionic agents exert slightly more alterations in cardiac hemodynamics and in electrocardiographic intervals. The vasodilatory effect on coronary artery diameter by Telebrix may entail a more rapid clearance of contrast medium from the coronary circulation, which might be of some advantage over nonionic contrast media.
