MR colonography without bowel purgation for the assessment of inflammatory bowel diseases: diagnostic accuracy and patient acceptance.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MR colonography (MRC) without bowel cleansing regarding its ability to quantify inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In addition, patient acceptance was compared with conventional colonoscopy (CC). METHODS: In all, 29 patients with IBD (17 ulcerative colitis; 12 Crohn's disease) were included. While CC was performed after bowel cleansing as the gold standard, MRC was based on a fecal tagging technique and performed 48-72 hours prior to CC. The presence of inflammation in each of 7 ileocolonic segments was rated for every procedure. Patients evaluated both modalities and dedicated aspects of the examination according to a 10-point-scale (1 = good, 10 = poor acceptance). Furthermore, preferences for future examinations were investigated. RESULTS: Inflammatory segments were found by means of CC in 23 and by MRC in 14 patients. Overall sensitivity and specificity of MRC in a segment-based detection were 32% and 88%, respectively. Concerning severely inflamed segments, sensitivity increased to 53% for MRC. Overall acceptance of CC was significantly higher compared to MRC (mean value (mv) for MRT = 6.0; CC = 4.1; P = 0.003). For MRC, the placement of the rectal tube (mv = 7.3), and for CC bowel purgation (mv = 6.5), were rated as the most unpleasant. A total of 67% of patients voted for CC as the favorable tool for future examinations. CONCLUSIONS: The presented data indicate that 'fecal tagging MRC' is not suitable for an adequate quantification of inflammatory diseases of the large bowel. Furthermore, overall acceptance of endoscopic colonoscopy was superior to MRC.

Early identification of peritonitis by peritoneal cytokine measurement.

PURPOSE: The assessment of plasma cytokine levels adds a useful tool to the diagnostic measures in severe inflammatory diseases. Proinflammatory cytokine levels in abdominal fluid after abdominal surgery have been shown to far exceed plasma cytokine levels. Thus, we investigated the local release of interleukin 1beta, interleukin 6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in patients after colorectal surgery during the early postoperative period to evaluate whether it may serve as an indicator of evolving peritonitis. METHOD: In a prospective, observational pilot study, the first 12 consecutive patients who did not develop any postoperative complications (Group I), and the first 12 patients with secondary peritonitis caused by an anastomotic leakage (Group II), were included in the study. Interleukin 6, interleukin 1beta, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels were determined in the abdominal exudate and compared between the groups within the first four days after colorectal surgery. RESULTS: Abdominal fluid interleukin 6 levels in Group II patients were higher (162,500 +/- 105,800 pg/ml) as early as the first postoperative day compared with Group I (27,940 +/- 13,860 pg/ml; P < 0.0001); this lasted for the whole observation period. The same applies to tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels (461.4 +/- 167.8 pg/ml vs. 175.8 +/- 178.6 pg/ml on day 1; P = 0.0007). The difference in interleukin 1beta cytokine levels became statistically significant on the third postoperative day. Moreover, abdominal fluid cytokine levels rose in Group II, whereas they remained virtually unchanged or even tended to decrease over time in Group I. CONCLUSION: We suggest that the estimation of the peritoneal cytokine levels might be an additional diagnostic tool that can support the early recognition of peritonitic complications in colorectal surgery.