Nursing and midwifery students' experiences and perception of their clinical learning environment in Malawi: a mixed-method study.

BACKGROUND: The clinical learning environment is an important part of the nursing and midwifery training as it helps students to integrate theory into clinical practice. However, not all clinical learning environments foster positive learning. This study aimed to assess the student nurses and midwives' experiences and perception of the clinical learning environment in Malawi. METHODS: A concurrent triangulation mixed methods research design was used to collect data from nursing and midwifery students. Quantitative data were collected using a Clinical Learning Environment Inventory, while qualitative data were collected using focus group discussions. The Clinical Learning Environment Inventory has six subscales of satisfaction, involvement, individualisation, innovation, task orientation and personalisation. The focus group interview guide had questions about clinical learning, supervision, assessment, communication and resources. Quantitative data were analysed by independent t-test and multivariate linear regression and qualitative data were thematically analysed. RESULTS: A total of 126 participants completed the questionnaire and 30 students participated in three focus group discussions. Satisfaction subscale had the highest mean score (M = 26.93, SD = 4.82) while individualisation had the lowest mean score (M = 18.01, SD =3.50). Multiple linear regression analysis showed a statistically significant association between satisfaction with clinical learning environment and personalization (ß = 0.50, p = < 0.001), and task orientation (ß =0.16 p = < 0.05). Teaching and learning resources, hostile environment, poor relationship with a qualified staff, absence of clinical supervisors, and lack of resources were some of the challenges faced by students in their clinical learning environment. CONCLUSION: Although satisfaction with clinical learning environment subscale had the highest mean score, nursing and midwifery students encountered multifaceted challenges such as lack of resources, poor relationship with staff and a lack of support from clinical teachers that negatively impacted on their clinical learning experiences. Training institutions and hospitals need to work together to find means of addressing the challenges by among others providing resources to students during clinical placement.

Psychological distress after recent detection of fetal malformation: short-term effect on second-trimester uteroplacental and fetoplacental circulation.

We examined the short-term effect of severe maternal psychological distress on the placental circulation in second trimester in a prospective observational study. In 86 pregnant women with a newly detected fetal malformation, and 98 women with normal ultrasound findings, distress was assessed using the Impact of Event Scale and the General Health Questionnaire-28. Uterine and umbilical artery pulsatility indices, notching and heart rates were measured by Doppler ultrasound. Psychological distress was high in the anomaly group, but circulatory outcome measures did not differ between groups. Multiple regression analyses did not show an increase in circulatory resistance measures even at high distress levels.

Acute maternal social dysfunction, health perception and psychological distress after ultrasonographic detection of a fetal structural anomaly.

OBJECTIVES: To predict acute psychological distress in pregnant women following detection of a fetal structural anomaly by ultrasonography, and to relate these findings to a comparison group. DESIGN: A prospective, observational study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre for fetal medicine. POPULATION: One hundred and eighty pregnant women with a fetal structural anomaly detected by ultrasound (study group) and 111 with normal ultrasound findings (comparison group) were included within a week following sonographic examination after gestational age 12 weeks (inclusion period: May 2006 to February 2009). METHODS: Social dysfunction and health perception were assessed by the corresponding subscales of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28). Psychological distress was assessed using the Impact of Events Scale (IES-22), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the anxiety and depression subscales of the GHQ-28. Fetal anomalies were classified according to severity and diagnostic or prognostic ambiguity at the time of assessment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Social dysfunction, health perception and psychological distress (intrusion, avoidance, arousal, anxiety, depression). RESULTS: The least severe anomalies with no diagnostic or prognostic ambiguity induced the lowest levels of IES intrusive distress (P = 0.025). Women included after 22 weeks of gestation (24%) reported significantly higher GHQ distress than women included earlier in pregnancy (P = 0.003). The study group had significantly higher levels of psychosocial distress than the comparison group on all psychometric endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological distress was predicted by gestational age at the time of assessment, severity of the fetal anomaly, and ambiguity concerning diagnosis or prognosis.

Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings: A study of second-trimester abortions.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate discrepancies between sonographic and autopsy findings following termination of pregnancy (TOP) in the second trimester. METHODS: This retrospective report is based on 288 consecutive second-trimester abortions carried out because of fetal malformations diagnosed by ultrasound examination at a tertiary referral center. The correlation between the results from the ultrasound and autopsy examinations was evaluated. RESULTS: Autopsy was performed in 274 cases. In 160 of the 274 pregnancies (58.4%) there was full agreement between the two examination methods. Findings detected by autopsy (in addition to those leading to termination) were not observed by ultrasonography in 86 (31.4%) of the pregnancies; of the 64 malformations that occurred, 30 (46.9%) were judged as 'detectable'. In 27 (9.9%) pregnancies, observations made by ultrasound (in addition to those leading to termination) were not confirmed at autopsy. In one pregnancy, postmortem radiology examination-but not autopsy-confirmed the ultrasound observations. No pregnancies were terminated because of false positive ultrasound observations. The correlation between ultrasound and autopsy findings was evaluated by three investigators; the inter-rater agreement was high (kappa = 0.85). CONCLUSION: Discrepancies between ultrasound and autopsy findings were observed in about 40% of the pregnancies. These discrepancies confirm the need for autopsy following TOP.