RESUMEN
Bone toxicities are common among paediatric patients treated for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) with potentially major negative impact on patients' quality of life. To identify the underlying genetic contributors, we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) and a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) in 260 patients of European-descent from the DFCI 05-001 ALL trial, with validation in 101 patients of European-descent from the DFCI 11-001 ALL trial. We identified a significant association between rs844882 on chromosome 20 and bone toxicities in the DFCI 05-001 trial (p = 1.7 × 10-8). In DFCI 11-001 trial, we observed a consistent trend of this variant with fracture. The variant was an eQTL for two nearby genes, CD93 and THBD. In TWAS, genetically predicted ACAD9 expression was associated with an increased risk of bone toxicities, which was confirmed by meta-analysis of the two cohorts (meta-p = 2.4 × 10-6). In addition, a polygenic risk score of heel quantitative ultrasound speed of sound was associated with fracture risk in both cohorts (meta-p = 2.3 × 10-3). Our findings highlight the genetic influence on treatment-related bone toxicities in this patient population. The genes we identified in our study provide new biological insights into the development of bone adverse events related to ALL treatment.
RESUMEN
Poverty-exposed children with cancer are more likely to experience adverse outcomes. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits improve food insecurity and child health outcomes, and could be used to mitigate disparities. We conducted a secondary analysis of parent-reported data collected in a frontline pediatric leukemia trial (NCT03020030) to assess SNAP eligibility (proxied by other means-tested program participation) and participation. At diagnosis, 105/287 families (37%) were SNAP-eligible, of whom 53 (50%) were SNAP participants. At 6 months, 104/257 families (41%) were SNAP-eligible, and 59 (57%) were SNAP participants. Interventions to increase benefits participation during childhood cancer treatment represent an immediate opportunity to reduce disparities.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Persons who speak languages other than English are underrepresented in clinical trials, likely in part because of inadequate multilevel resources. We conducted a survey of institutions affiliated with the Children's Oncology Group (COG) to characterize current research recruitment practices and resources regarding translation and interpretation services. METHODS: In October 2022, a 20-item survey was distributed electronically to institutions affiliated with COG to assess consent practices and resources for recruiting participants who speak languages other than English to COG trials. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses; responses were compared by institution size and type as well as respondent role. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 230 institutions, and the response rate was 60% (n = 139). In total, 60% (n = 83) of those respondents had access to short-form consent forms. Full consent form translation was required at 50% of institutions, and 12% of institutional review boards restricted use of centrally translated consent forms. Forty-six percent (n = 64) of institutions reported insufficient funding to support translation costs; 19% (n = 26) had access to no-cost translation services. Forty-four percent (n = 61) were required to use in-person interpreters for consent discussions; the most frequently cited barrier (56%) to obtaining consent was lack of available in-person interpreters. Forty-seven percent (n = 65) reported that recruiting persons who speak languages other than English to clinical trials was somewhat or very difficult. CONCLUSIONS: Institutions affiliated with COG face resource-specific challenges that impede recruitment of participants who speak languages other than English for clinical trials. These findings indicate an urgent need to identify strategies aimed at reducing recruitment barriers to ensure equitable access to clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Barreras de Comunicación , Lenguaje , Selección de Paciente , Humanos , Niño , Traducción , Formularios de Consentimiento , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Consentimiento Informado , Neoplasias/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with diagnostic delays in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult cancers are poorly understood. METHODS: Using the Optum Labs Data Warehouse's de-identified claims data for commercial health plan enrollees, we identified children (0-14 years) and adolescents/young adults (AYAs) (15-39 years) diagnosed with one of 10 common cancers from 2001 to 2017, who were continuously enrolled for 6 months preceding diagnosis. Time to diagnosis was calculated as days between first medical encounter with possible cancer symptoms and cancer diagnosis date. Median times from first symptom to diagnosis were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Multivariable unconditional logistic regression identified sociodemographic factors associated with longer time (>3 months) to cancer diagnosis (from symptom onset). RESULTS: Of 47,296 patients, 87% presented prior to diagnosis with symptoms. Patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumors were most likely to present with symptoms (93%), whereas patients with cervical cancer were least likely (70%). Symptoms varied by malignancy. Of patients with symptoms, thyroid (105 days [range: 50-154]) and cervical (104 days [range: 41-151]) cancer had the longest median time to diagnosis. Females and patients at either end of the age spectrum were more likely to experience diagnosis delays of more than 3 months. CONCLUSION: In a commercially insured population, time to diagnosis varies by cancer type, age, and sex. Further work is needed to understand the patient, provider, and health system-level factors contributing to time from symptom onset to diagnosis, specifically in the very young children and the young adult patient population going forward.
Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico Tardío , Neoplasias , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Adolescente , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Niño , Diagnóstico Tardío/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Preescolar , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pronóstico , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a treatable cancer with an incidence peak in adolescent and young adult years. Treatment strategies have been developed to balance the intensity of therapy needed to maintain disease-free survival while simultaneously preserving overall survival. Risk-based, response-adapted frontline therapy has long used a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT). Successive clinical trials over the past three decades have safely reduced cumulative alkylator, anthracycline, and RT exposures for many patients. The advent of checkpoint inhibitors and the CD30-targeted antibody drug conjugate, brentuximab vedotin, has provided new options for de-escalation of conventional therapies associated with late effects in survivors treated at a young age. The ability to evaluate novel agents has been accelerated in collaborative trials inclusive of children and adolescents within the US National Clinical Trials Network and between the Children's Oncology Group and the EuroNet Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma Consortium. With numerous treatment options, patients with HL and their clinicians have an opportunity for shared decision making from diagnosis, through cancer treatment, and into survivorship. Given excellent survival outcomes, decisions about treatment in classic HL should be collaborative and attention to long-term survivorship needs should remain a high priority. Patient-reported outcomes remain an important tool to aid clinicians working with survivors to optimize health status and related quality of life for decades after HL therapy.
Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Enfermedad de Hodgkin , Humanos , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/terapia , Adolescente , Niño , Nivel de Atención , Terapia CombinadaRESUMEN
The goal of therapy in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is to maximize overall survival while minimizing the morbidity of curative therapy. Key findings from recent Children's Oncology Group (COG) trials include: (i) superior event-free survival with the addition of brentuximab vedotin (Bv) in frontline regimens for high-risk disease, (ii) successful reduction in myeloablative regimens with demonstrated safety and efficacy of Bv and checkpoint inhibitor therapy in relapsed disease, and (ii) the potential to select a population that can be salvaged after relapse without receiving a stem cell transplant. The COG HL committee will lead a National cancer Institute National Clinical Trials Network phase 3 trial to evaluate the combination of Bv/nivolumab in early-stage disease. Ongoing advances in technology and blood biomarkers are increasing the ability to deliver biologically driven, personalized treatment for HL.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Hodgkin , Inmunoconjugados , Humanos , Niño , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Brentuximab Vedotina/uso terapéutico , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin ProgresiónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Parent psychological distress during childhood cancer treatment has short- and long-term implications for parent, child, and family well-being. Identifying targetable predictors of parental distress is essential to inform interventions. We investigated the association between household material hardship (HMH), a modifiable poverty-exposure defined as housing, food, or utility insecurity, and severe psychological distress among parents of children aged 1-17 years with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) enrolled on the multicenter Dana-Farber ALL Consortium Trial 16-001. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of parent-reported data. Parents completed an HMH survey within 32 days of clinical trial enrollment (T0) and again at 6 months into therapy (T1). The primary exposure was HMH at T0 and primary outcome was severe parental distress at T0 and T1, defined as a score greater than or equal to 13 on the Kessler-6 Psychological Distress Scale. Multivariable models were adjusted for ALL risk group and single parent status. RESULTS: Among 375 evaluable parents, one-third (32%; n = 120/375) reported HMH at T0. In multivariable analyses, T0 HMH was associated with over twice the odds of severe psychological distress at T0 and T1 HMH was associated with over 5 times the odds of severe distress at T1. CONCLUSIONS: Despite uniform clinical trial treatment of their children at well-resourced pediatric centers, HMH-exposed parents-compared with unexposed parents-experienced statistically significantly increased odds of severe psychological distress at the time of their child's leukemia diagnosis, which worsened 6 months into therapy. These data identify a high-risk parental population who may benefit from early psychosocial and HMH-targeted interventions to mitigate disparities in well-being.
Asunto(s)
Pobreza , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Niño , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Padres/psicología , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Estrés Psicológico/diagnósticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Implementation of routine financial screening is a critical step toward mitigating financial toxicity. We evaluated the feasibility, sustainability, and acceptability of systematic financial screening in the outpatient breast oncology clinic at a large, urban cancer center. METHODS: We developed and implemented a stakeholder-informed process to systematically screen for financial hardship and worry. A 2-item assessment in English or Spanish was administered to patients through the electronic medical record portal or using paper forms. We evaluated completion rates and mode of completion. Through feedback from patients, clinicians, and staff, we identified strategies to improve completion rates and acceptability. RESULTS: From March, 2021, to February, 2022, 3,500 patients were seen in the breast oncology clinic. Of them, 39% (n = 1,349) responded to the screening items, either by paper or portal, 12% (n = 437) preferred not to answer, and the remaining 49% (n = 1,714) did not have data in their electronic health record, meaning they were not offered screening or did not complete the paper forms. Young adults (18-39 years) were more likely to respond compared with patients 70 years or older (61% v 30%, P < .01). English-preferring patients were more likely to complete the screening compared with those who preferred Spanish (46% v 28%, P < .01). Non-Hispanic White patients were more likely to respond compared with Non-Hispanic Black patients and with Hispanic patients (46% v 39% v 32%, P < .01). Strategies to improve completion rates included partnering with staff to facilitate paper form administration, optimizing patient engagement with the portal, and clearly communicating the purpose of the screening. CONCLUSION: Systematic financial screening is feasible, and electronic data capture facilitates successful implementation. However, inclusive procedures that address language and technology preferences are needed to optimize screening.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Financiación Personal , Oncología Médica , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Oncología Médica/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Adolescente , AdultoRESUMEN
Background: Oral chemotherapy nonadherence is a challenge in clinical oncology. During therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), poor adherence to 6-mercaptopurine (6MP) increases relapse risk. Clinically significant nonadherence is reported in 30% of children treated for ALL on Children's Oncology Group (COG) trials. Whether nonadherence rates vary across regimens with different treatment schedules and modes of administration is unknown. Methods: We conducted an exploratory, cross-sectional survey study on parents of children (1-18 years) receiving continuation therapy on, or as per Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) ALL Consortium Protocol 11-001. Treatment required weekly visits to the clinic and 14 days of oral 6MP every 3 weeks. Survey assessed self-reported sociodemographics, medication-taking, chemotherapy comprehension, and 6MP adherence; adherence survey items were developed from published surveys. Patients were grouped as nonadherent if they endorsed missing one 6MP dose during the last cycle, or more than one dose during prior cycles, for nonmedical reasons. Results: Sixty-two families completed the surveys, all of whom had evaluable adherence data. In total, 25% of patients met the study definition of nonadherence. Twenty-three percent reported that it was "not easy" to follow administration guidelines around the dairy intake and 57% requested more teaching and educational resources. Conclusion: Self-reported nonadherence to oral 6MP in the DFCI ALL Consortium is high, with rates similar to those observed in the COG. This suggests that the additional contact during weekly infusions on the DFCI is insufficient to address barriers affecting oral chemotherapy adherence.
Asunto(s)
Mercaptopurina , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Niño , Humanos , Mercaptopurina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
Social determinants of health (SDoH) are associated with stark disparities in cancer outcomes, but systematic SDoH data collection is virtually absent from oncology clinical trials. Trial-based SDoH data are essential to ensure representation of marginalized populations, contextualize outcome disparities, and identify health-equity intervention opportunities. We report the feasibility of a pediatric oncology multicenter therapeutic trial-embedded SDoH investigation. Among 448 trial participants, 392 (87.5%) opted-in to the embedded SDoH study; 375 (95.7%) completed baseline surveys, with high longitudinal response rates (88.9-93.1%) over 24 months. Trial-embedded SDoH data collection is feasible and acceptable and must be consistently included within future oncology trials.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Niño , Estudios de Factibilidad , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with sarcoma experience both acute and chronic pain related to their disease and treatment. Studies in older adults have reported a high risk of persistent opioid use after cancer therapy among previously opioid-naive patients; however, few studies have evaluated posttreatment opioid use among AYAs. This article describes patterns of new persistent opioid use among AYAs in the year after treatment for sarcoma. METHODS: Opioid-naive patients who were 10 to 26 years old and diagnosed with sarcoma (2008-2016) were identified with the IBM Marketscan Database. Included subjects had an International Classification of Diseases code for sarcoma (ninth or tenth revision), received anticancer therapy (chemotherapy, surgery, and/or radiation) within 30 days of the first diagnosis code, and had continuous insurance coverage (commercial or Medicaid) for more than 12 months both before the diagnosis and after the last therapy. The primary outcome was new persistent opioid use, which was defined as at least 2 opioid prescriptions in the 12 months following treatment completion. Covariates included age, sex, insurance, tumor type, surgical procedure, mental health (MH) or substance use diagnoses before or during therapy, and concomitant lorazepam use. RESULTS: In total, 938 patients met the inclusion criteria; 521 (56%) were male, and 578 (62%) were younger than 18 years. In total, 727 (78%) had commercial insurance, and 273 (29%) had an MH diagnosis either before or during the treatment period. Of the total group, 464 (49%) used opioids during treatment only. Of those who used opioids during treatment, 135 (23%) received at least 2 prescriptions in the year after therapy. In a multivariable analysis, Medicaid versus commercial insurance (odds ratio [OR], 1.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.64) and non-soft tissue sarcoma (OR for Ewing sarcoma, 3.23; 95% CI, 1.81-5.78; OR for osteosarcoma, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.36-3.09) conferred a higher likelihood of new persistent use. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of AYAs treated for sarcoma, 64% of the patients received opioid prescriptions during treatment, and 23% of these patients became new persistent users. Because of the risks associated with persistent opioid use, studies of novel pain management strategies along with age-appropriate education and anticipatory guidance are urgently needed. LAY SUMMARY: Using an insurance claims database, we conducted a study to determine the rate of new persistent opioid use among adolescents and young adults treated for sarcoma. We found that 64% of adolescents and young adults treated for sarcoma received opioid prescriptions during treatment, and 23% of these patients met the criteria for new persistent opioid use. These findings support the need for age-appropriate education and novel pain management strategies in this vulnerable population.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Sarcoma , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Niño , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Sarcoma/epidemiología , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The advances in pediatric cancer outcomes over the last quarter century are some of the most successful in modern medicine. Improved diagnostics and novel therapies have led to continued increases in the survival rates of most patients; however, not all populations have benefitted equally. Compared to White children, Black, Indigenous, People of Color patients with cancer more often present with advanced stage illness, less frequently participate in clinical trials, and are more likely to be lost to follow-up once therapy is complete. Proposed hypotheses for these disparities include both biologic and nonbiologic factors, and a growing body of research suggests that barriers influencing care from diagnosis through survivorship are important. In this article, we consider how primary pediatricians can help reduce disparities over the cancer continuum by identifying vulnerable populations, considering potential diagnoses, referring to cancer centers, and following up with patients through survivorship in partnership with the oncology team. [Pediatr Ann. 2022;51(1):e22-e26.].
Asunto(s)
Equidad en Salud , Neoplasias , Humanos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/terapia , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Poblaciones VulnerablesRESUMEN
We compared secondary primary malignancy risk (SPM) in HIV-uninfected and HIV-infected Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors. We used data from the California Cancer Registry on patients diagnosed with HL from 1990 to 2015 (all ages included), and standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and multivariable competing risk models for analyses. Of 19,667 survivors, 735 were HIV-infected. Compared with the general population, the risk of SPM was increased by 2.66-fold in HIV-infected and 1.92-fold in HIV-uninfected survivors. Among HIV-infected survivors, median time to development of SPM was shorter (5.4 years) than in HIV-uninfected patients (8.1 years). Additionally, the highest risk of SPM was observed <2 years after diagnosis in HIV-infected survivors (SIR = 4.47), whereas risk was highest ≥20 years after diagnosis (SIR = 2.39) in HIV-uninfected survivors. The risk of SPMs persisted for decades and was higher among HIV-infected survivors, suggesting that these patients should benefit from long-term surveillance and cancer prevention practices.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Enfermedad de Hodgkin , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/etiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/epidemiología , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/etiología , Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , SobrevivientesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Adolescents with Hodgkin lymphoma have worse disease outcomes than children. Whether these differences persist within clinical trials is unknown. We examined survival, by age, in patients receiving response-adapted therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma on Children's Oncology Group (COG) trials. METHODS: Patients (aged 1-21 years) diagnosed with classical Hodgkin lymphoma and enrolled between Sept 23, 2002, and Jan 19, 2012, on one of three phase 3 COG trials in the USA and Canada were eligible for inclusion. The three COG trials were defined by risk group according to Ann Arbor stage, B-symptoms, and bulk (AHOD0431 [low risk; NCT00302003], AHOD0031 [intermediate risk; NCT00025259], or AHOD0831 [high risk; NCT01026220]). The outcomes of this study were event-free survival (death, relapse, or subsequent neoplasm) and overall survival. Cox proportional hazards models estimated survival, adjusting for disease and treatment factors both overall and in patients with mixed cellularity or non-mixed cellularity (nodular sclerosing and not-otherwise-specified) disease. FINDINGS: Of 2155 patients enrolled on the three trials, 1907 (88·4%; 968 [50·8%] male and 939 [49·2%] female; 1227 [64·3%] non-Hispanic White) were included in this analysis. After a median follow-up of 7·4 years (IQR 4·3-10·2), older patients (aged ≥15 years) had worse unadjusted 5-year event-free survival (80% [95% CI 78-83]) than did younger patients (aged <15 years; 86% [83-88]; HR 1·38 [1·11-1·71]; p=0·0038). Older patients also had worse unadjusted 5-year overall survival than did younger patients (96% [95% CI 95-97] vs 99% [98-99]; HR 2·50 [1·41-4·45]; p=0·0012). In patients with non-mixed cellularity histology, older patients had a significantly increased risk of having an event than did younger patients with the same histology (HR 1·32 [1·03-1·68]; p=0·027). Older patients with mixed cellularity had significantly worse 5-year event-free survival than did younger patients in unadjusted (77% [95% CI 65-86] for older patients vs 94% [88-97] for younger patients; HR 2·93 [1·37-6·29]; p=0·0039) and multivariable models (HR 3·72 [1·56-8·91]; p=0·0032). Overall, older patients were more likely to die than younger patients (HR 3·08 [1·49-6·39]; p=0·0025). INTERPRETATION: Adolescents (≥15 years) treated on COG Hodgkin lymphoma trials had worse event-free survival and increased risk of death compared with children (<15 years). Our findings highlight the need for prospective studies to examine tumour and host biology, and to test novel therapies across the age spectrum. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health, St Baldrick's Foundation, and Lymphoma Research Foundation.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Hodgkin , Adolescente , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The molecular hallmark of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is characterized by recurrent, prognostic genetic alterations, many of which are cryptic by conventional cytogenetics. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is a powerful next-generation sequencing technology that can simultaneously identify cryptic gene rearrangements, sequence mutations and gene expression profiles in a single assay. We examined the feasibility and utility of incorporating RNA-seq into a prospective multicenter phase 3 clinical trial for children with newly diagnosed ALL. The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute ALL Consortium Protocol 16-001 enrolled 173 patients with ALL who consented to optional studies and had samples available for RNA-seq. RNA-seq identified at least 1 alteration in 157 patients (91%). Fusion detection was 100% concordant with results obtained from conventional cytogenetic analyses. An additional 56 gene fusions were identified by RNA-seq, many of which confer prognostic or therapeutic significance. Gene expression profiling enabled further molecular classification into the following B-cell ALL (B-ALL) subgroups: high hyperdiploid (n = 36), ETV6-RUNX1/-like (n = 31), TCF3-PBX1 (n = 7), KMT2A-rearranged (KMT2A-R; n = 5), intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 (iAMP21) (n = 1), hypodiploid (n = 1), Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive/Ph-like (n = 16), DUX4-R (n = 11), PAX5 alterations (PAX5 alt; n = 11), PAX5 P80R (n = 1), ZNF384-R (n = 4), NUTM1-R (n = 1), MEF2D-R (n = 1), and others (n = 10). RNA-seq identified 141 nonsynonymous mutations in 93 patients (54%); the most frequent were RAS-MAPK pathway mutations. Among 79 patients with both low-density array and RNA-seq data for the Philadelphia chromosome-like gene signature prediction, results were concordant in 74 patients (94%). In conclusion, RNA-seq identified several clinically relevant genetic alterations not detected by conventional methods, which supports the integration of this technology into front-line pediatric ALL trials. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03020030.
Asunto(s)
Cromosoma Filadelfia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Niño , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Reordenamiento Génico , Humanos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/diagnóstico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/genética , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Adolescents and young adults (AYAs; age 15-39 years) with cancer are under-represented in cancer clinical trials because of patient, provider, and institutional barriers. Health care technology is increasingly available to and highly used among AYAs and has the potential to improve cancer care delivery. The COVID-19 pandemic forced institutions to rapidly adopt novel approaches for enrollment and monitoring of patients on cancer clinical trials, many of which have the potential for improving AYA trial participation overall. This consensus statement from the Children's Oncology Group AYA Oncology Discipline Committee reviews opportunities to use technology to optimize AYA trial enrollment and study conduct, as well as considerations for widespread implementation of these practices. The use of remote patient eligibility screening, electronic informed consent, virtual tumor boards, remote study visits, and remote patient monitoring are recommended to increase AYA access to trials and decrease the burden of participation. Widespread adoption of these strategies will require new policies focusing on reimbursement for telehealth, license portability, facile communication between electronic health record systems and advanced safeguards to maintain patient privacy and security. Studies are needed to determine optimal approaches to further incorporate technology at every stage of the clinical trial process, from enrollment through study completion.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Adolescente , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Comunicación , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Tecnología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Background: We examined the impact of race/ethnicity and age on survival in a publicly insured cohort of children and adolescent/young adults (AYA; 15-39 years) with Hodgkin lymphoma, adjusting for chemotherapy using linked Medicaid claims. Materials and Methods: We identified 1231 Medicaid-insured patients <1-39 years diagnosed with classical Hodgkin lymphoma between 2005 and 2015, in the New York State Cancer Registry. Chemotherapy regimens were based on contemporary therapeutic regimens. Cox proportional hazards regression models quantified associations of patient, disease, and treatment variables with overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS), and are presented as hazard ratios (HR) with confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results: At median follow-up of 6.6 years, N = 1108 (90%) patients were alive; 5-year OS was 92% in children <15 years. In multivariable models, Black (vs. White) patients had 1.6-fold increased risk of death (HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.02-2.46; p = 0.042). Stage III/IV (vs. I/II) was associated with 1.9-fold increased risk of death (HR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.25-2.78; p = 0.002) and treatment at a non-National Cancer Institute (NCI) affiliate was associated with worse DSS (HR: 2.71, 95% CI: 1.47-4.98; p = 0.001). Conclusions: In this Medicaid-insured cohort of children and AYAs with Hodgkin lymphoma, Black race/ethnicity remained associated with inferior OS in multivariable models adjusted for disease, demographic, and treatment data. Further work is needed to identify dimensions of health care access not mediated by insurance, as findings suggest additional factors are contributing to observed cancer disparities in vulnerable pediatric and AYA populations.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Hodgkin , Adolescente , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Medicaid , New York/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Both adolescent and young adult (AYA) and Black or African American (hereafter referred to as Black) cancer patients are historically under-enrolled in cancer treatment trials (CTT). The purpose of this study was to quantify enrollment of Black AYAs in National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored CTTs overall and by age, sex, and cancer diagnosis during 2000-2015. METHODS: Utilizing data from NCI's Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program and the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program, we assessed CTT enrollment in Black patients with cancer and measured changes in enrollment over time between the study periods 2000-2007 and 2008-2015. Enrollment patterns were compared across age groups (≤14 years [y], 15-19y, 20-29y, 30-39y and 40+ years), sex, and cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: From 2000 through 2015, <3% of Black AYAs (20-39y) enrolled on CTTs. While AYAs had significantly higher cancer incidence than children, 20.5% fewer Black AYAs enrolled on CTTs. Enrollment was lowest among Black males 20-29y, with a mean of 18 enrolling in CTTs annually. The proportion of AYA enrollees who were Black did not change significantly over time periods (2000-2007 vs 2008-2015). CONCLUSIONS: Few Black AYAs enroll in CTTs each year. Given known benefits of clinical trial participation and the well-documented racial and age-related differences in cancer outcomes, addressing barriers to enrollment in these patients may, in turn, reduce disparities. Targeted interventions aimed at increasing the CTT enrollment of Black cancer patients, particularly young Black men, are urgently needed. PRECIS: This study documents that compared with Black children, Black adolescent, and young adult (AYA) patients were less likely to enroll in NCI-sponsored CTTs from 2000 to 2015. Black AYA male enrollment decreased with increasing age, highlighting disparities among this specific population in CTT enrollment.