Fournier's Gangrene: Microbiological Profile and Risk Factors for Mortality: Review of 97 Cases.

Objective: Fournier's gangrene (FG) is a rare necrotizing fasciitis affecting genital and perianal areas. This study aimed to provide data on predicting factors, mortality rates, and factors affecting mortality in comparison of survivors and non-survivors in patients with FG. Materials and Methods: This study included a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with FG between 2008 and 2018. Results: A total of 97 patients with FG were included in this study. Of the patients, 72 (74%) were male. The mean age was 56.03±13.92 years, and the median was 57 (21-90). The mortality rate was 21.6%. The most frequently isolated microorganism from tissue and blood cultures was Escherichia coli (43%-42%). The median Fournier's Gangrene Severity Index (FGSI) and Uludag FGSI (UFGSI) scores were 4 (0-20) and 5 (1-22), respectively. In the univariate model, mortality risk increases 7.18 times (p=0.001) in patients with two or more comorbidities, 1.31 times as the FGSI score increases (p<0.001), 1.28 times as the UFGSI score increases (p<0.001). When the cut-off value was set as 8 for the FGSI score, the sensitivity was 71.43%, and the specificity was 73.68%. The sensitivity was 73.43%, and the specificity was 75% when the cut-off value was set as 6 for the UFGSI score. In the univariate model, the mortality risk of those with hypotension was 6.07 times higher (p=0.003); as the platelet count increased, mortality risk decreased (odds ratio [OR]=0.99; p=0.02). The mortality risk of those hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) was 16.5 times higher than those followed in the ward (p<0.001). In the multivariate model, this ratio was 6.49. Conclusion: We concluded that FGSI and UFGSI scores could be used to predict mortality. Management of FG requires a multidisciplinary approach. Empiric treatment should include carbapenems and be de-escalated once getting the culture results. Authors from different centers should report their experiences to help reveal the ideal treatment and evaluate the consequences.

A Novel First-Line Treatment Alternative for Noncomplicated Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: Combined Intralesional Steroid Injection with Topical Steroid Administration.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is a rare form of nonlactational mastitis. Due to the small number of case series and consequently inadequate prospective studies, there is still no consensus on the optimal treatment of IGM. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of intralesional steroid injection with concomitant topical steroids to systemic steroid therapy only in the treatment of noncomplicated IGM. METHODS: Between June 2015 and April 2018, the patients' data was prospectively collected and analyzed retrospectively. The study included a total of 78 female patients diagnosed with IGM. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the local steroid treatment group (intralesional steroid injection with topical steroid administration; group 1, n = 46) and the peroral systemic steroid treatment group (group 2, n = 32). Response to the therapy, side effects, recurrence, the need for surgical treatment, and complication rates were compared. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (93.5%) in group 1 achieved a partial or complete response compared to 23 patients (71.9%) in group 2 after 3 months; this difference was significant (p = 0.012). The recurrence rates were significantly lower in group 1 (8.7%) compared to group 2 (46.9%; p = 0.001), and the need for surgical treatment was significantly less in group 1 (2.2%) than in group 2 (9.4%; p = 0.001). While the complication rates were similar between groups, a higher rate of systemic side effects was observed in group 2. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of our study, combined steroid injection and topical steroid treatment in IGM is as effective as systemic steroid treatment. We suggest that this combination therapy of topical steroids and local steroid injection should be used as first-line therapy in patients with noncomplicated IGM.

Bowel and mesenteric injury in blunt trauma: diagnostic efficiency and importance of experience in using multidetector computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic efficiency of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in the detection of blunt bowel and mesenteric injuries (BBMI), and the role of different experience levels in using MDCT. METHODS: This study included a test group of twenty-seven patients with surgically important BBMI in whom the diagnoses were confirmed after surgical intervention (23 men and 4 women; mean age, 40.7±16.2; range, 18-76), and a control group of twenty-one matched patients without BBMI who underwent laparotomy for trauma during the same time period (16 men and 5 women; mean age, 38.9±14.5; range, 20-68) and sixteen-detector computed tomography prior to surgery. Intraoperative findings were compared with MDCT findings. RESULTS: High accuracy, specificity, and positive predictive values in MDCT findings with respect to intraperitoneal free air, mesenteric air, thickened (>4-5 mm) and defected bowel wall, increased contrast enhancement on bowel wall, and mesenteric hematoma were found among others (p<0.01). Sensitivities and specificities of the diagnosis of BBMI by the resident and staff radiologist was 74% and 71%, and 85% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: MDCT displays BBMI with high sensitivity and specificity, and can predict the need for surgery. Experience in radiology is an important factor for appropriate interpretation of the MDCT findings.

Long-term outcomes of intraoperative and perioperative albendazole treatment in hepatic hydatidosis: single center experience.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcome of the intraoperative and perioperative albendazole (ALB) treatment on the recurrence and/or secondary hydatidosis. METHODS: One hundred and one patients with hepatic hydatidosis were treated intraoperatively and perioperatively with ALB, in addition to surgery. Perioperative ALB treatment was given in a dose of 12-15 mg/kg/day. The ALB treatment was started 13.27 ± 14.34 days before the surgery, and it was continued for 4.39 ± 3.11 months postoperatively. A total of 1.7 µg/mL of ALB solution was used as a protoscolidal agent. The follow-up period was 134.55 ± 51.56 months. RESULTS: Four patients died, with only one death was secondary to hydatid disease (cerebral eccinococcus). There was only one recurrence (1%) of hepatic hydatidosis. Early and late morbidity rates were 8.91% and 7.92%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that intraoperative and perioperative ALB is effective for the prevention of hepatic hydatidosis recurrence and/or secondary hydatidosis.

Increasing trend of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: what are the factors behind this phenomenon?

INTRODUCTION: Numerous studies have shown a trend towards increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in the US. In this review, we will explore the trend, possible causative factors and outcomes from CPM. METHODS: We performed a literature review of all relevant retrospective reviews, clinical trials and review articles regarding contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. RESULTS: Several studies have noted a four to fivefold increase in CPM in recent years; an increase most notable in younger patients. When surveyed, patients report that the most important factors affecting their choice of CPM include fear of cancer recurrence, genetic counseling/testing, family history or additional high risk factors, stress surrounding close follow up, the availability of reconstructive surgery and information provided about contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk and risk for local recurrence. Women who have undergone CPM do report high satisfaction with the procedure and some studies suggest risk reduction. CONCLUSION: CPM rates have increased across the US and numerous factors have been reported to increase the likelihood of choosing CPM. Despite that bilateral mastectomy is associated with an increased risk of wound and overall postoperative complications for certain populations, this surgery appears to have psychological, cosmetic and possibly oncologic benefit.