RESUMEN
Acute injury of the trigeminal nerve or its branches can result in posttraumatic trigeminal neuropathy (PTTN). Affected patients suffer from chronic debilitating symptoms long after they have recovered from the inciting trauma. Symptoms vary but usually consist of paresthesia, allodynia, dysesthesia, hyperalgesia, or a combination of these symptoms. PTTN of the trigeminal nerve can result from a variety of traumas, including iatrogenic injury from various dental and maxillofacial procedures. Treatments include medications, pulsed radiofrequency modulation, and microsurgical repair. Although trigeminal nerve stimulation has been reported for trigeminal neuropathy, V3 implantation is often avoided because of an elevated migration risk secondary to mandibular motion, and lingual nerve implantation has not been documented. Here, the authors report on a patient who suffered from refractory PTTN despite multiple alternative treatments. He elected to undergo novel placement of a lingual nerve stimulator for neuromodulation therapy. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first documented case of lingual nerve stimulator implantation for lingual neuropathy, a technique for potentially reducing the risk of electrode migration.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Nervio Lingual , Traumatismos del Nervio Trigémino/terapia , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Humanos , Traumatismos del Nervio Lingual/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Dolor/etiología , Manejo del Dolor , Enfermedades de la Lengua/etiología , Enfermedades de la Lengua/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades del Nervio TrigéminoRESUMEN
Importance: As cell phones gain more influence in daily life, they also become potentially more hazardous. Injuries resulting from cell phone use have long been reported largely in the context of driving-related incidents, but other mechanisms of injury have been underreported. Objective: To assess the incidence, types, and mechanisms of head and neck injuries associated with cell phone use. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cross-sectional study using data from a national database of individuals with head and neck injuries related to cell phone use who presented to emergency departments in the United States between January 1998 and December 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incidence, types, and mechanisms of injury related to cell phone use in the US population. Results: A reported total of 2501 patients (1129 [55.0%] female, 795 [38.8%] white, and 772 [37.6%] aged 13-29 years) presented with injuries of the head and neck related to cell phone use; the estimated weighted national total was 76â¯043 patients (42â¯846 females [56.3%], 34â¯894 [45.9%] white, and 29â¯956 [39.4%] aged 13-29 years). The most commonly reported subsites of injuries in the head and neck region included the head (33.1% of estimated total); face, including eyelid, eye area, and nose (32.7%); and neck (12.5%). The most common injury diagnoses included laceration (26.3% of estimated total), contusion/abrasion (24.5%), and internal organ injury (18.4%). Age group distributions showed that most injuries associated with cell phone user distraction occurred among individuals aged 13 to 29 years (60.3%; Cramer V = 0.29). In addition, those younger than 13 years were significantly more likely to sustain direct mechanical injury from a cell phone (82.1%) than to have a cell phone use-associated injury (17.9%) (Cramer V = 0.305), whereas a cell phone use-associated injury was more likely than a direct mechanical injury to occur among those aged 50 to 64 years (68.2% vs 31.8%; Cramer V = 0.11) and those older than 65 years (90.3% vs 9.7%; Cramer V = 0.29). Conclusions and Relevance: Cell phone-related injuries to the head and neck have increased steeply over the recent 20-year period, with many cases resulting from distraction. Although the disposition of most cases is simple, some injuries bear a risk of long-term complications. Many of these injuries occurred among those aged 13 to 29 years and were associated with common activities, such as texting while walking. These findings suggest a need for patient education about injury prevention and the dangers of activity while using these devices.
Asunto(s)
Uso del Teléfono Celular/efectos adversos , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/epidemiología , Traumatismos del Cuello/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Atención , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/etiología , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos del Cuello/etiología , Traumatismos del Cuello/prevención & control , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the national incidence of facial trauma among toddlers and delineate patterns of injury and their causes. METHODS: A retrospective review was designed to explore patterns of maxillofacial trauma within toddler-aged children using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System from the Consumer Product Safety Commission. The database was searched for emergency department visits involving facial trauma sustained by children 12 months through 3 years of age from 2010 through 2014 and analyzed for patient demographics, primary diagnosis, and associated products/activities. Subset analyses were performed between age groups to determine the relationship between causes of injury and age using extrapolated national incidences. RESULTS: A sample of 45,249 patients extrapolated to an estimated 1.3 million emergency department visits for facial trauma in toddlers from 2010 to 2014, averaging 260,000 annually. Injuries involving foreign bodies and fractures had a higher incidence in toddlers 2 years or older, and fractures comprised fewer than 1% of facial injuries in any age group. Furniture was the most common source of trauma overall, with a higher frequency among toddlers aged 12 to 17 months. Trauma in the setting of sports was more common in toddlers aged 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: The low incidence of facial fractures further supports recommendations against routine imaging in toddler facial trauma and suggests that more focus should be placed on investigating for concurrent traumas and soft tissue injuries where fractures are involved. Our findings highlight prevention opportunities, particularly in furniture-related injuries for toddlers aged 12 to 17 months and sports-related traumas in toddlers aged 3 years. Our study also suggests restricting certain toys from 3-year-old toddlers to decrease the risk of aspiration.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/epidemiología , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Huesos Faciales/lesiones , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas Craneales/epidemiología , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Enfermedades del Oído/diagnóstico , Osteogénesis Imperfecta/complicaciones , Perforación de la Membrana Timpánica/diagnóstico , Niño , Conducto Auditivo Externo/patología , Enfermedades del Oído/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Osteogénesis Imperfecta/genética , Osteogénesis Imperfecta/patología , Otoscopía , Membrana Timpánica/patología , Perforación de la Membrana Timpánica/genéticaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aims of this study were as follows: To determine the national incidence of facial fractures among infants, toddlers, and children; to evaluate the types of facial fractures; and to analyze common products/activities associated with the fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted to explore patterns of facial fractures among infants (<1 year), toddlers (1-3 years), and children (3-5 years), using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) from the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). The database was searched for emergency department (ED) visits involving facial fractures sustained by children 1 month through 5 years of age from 2004 through 2016 and analyzed for patient demographics, primary diagnosis and associated products/activities. Subset analyses were performed between age groups to determine the relationship between causes of injury and age using extrapolated national incidences. RESULTS: A total of 1507 ED visits for facial fractures among infants, toddlers, and children were obtained and extrapolated to an estimated total of 39,388 ED visits, averaging 3030 annually. The majority of these ED visits were for facial fractures that occurred at home. Most facial fractures sustained at the age period of 1 month-5 years old were nasal fractures. Facial fractures in infants were caused most commonly by floors or flooring materials, likely due to falls, while household items/furniture-related injuries were the most common cause of facial fractures in both toddlers and children. Facial fractures from playground equipment and riding toys were more common in children than in the other age groups. CONCLUSION: The reported trends in the incidence by age group and types of fracture can assist physicians by serving as supplement for clinical history and examination when encountering this challenging patient population. Our findings highlight preventative opportunities, particularly in baby care items and beds for reducing facial fractures in infants. Similarly, preventative opportunities are highlighted in household items and furniture for lowering the incidence of facial fractures in toddlers and children. Our study also suggests ensuring safe handling of playground equipment and riding toys for the prevention of facial fractures in children.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Faciales/epidemiología , Fracturas Craneales/epidemiología , Preescolar , Traumatismos Faciales/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas Craneales/etiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Occipital-frontal nerve stimulation is an off-label therapy for treating chronic refractory migraine and orofacial pain. Though effective, patients experience a high rate of complications including lead migration and erosion through the overlying skin. CASE DESCRIPTION: We present a case of frontal electrode erosion that was revised via pericranial flap repair. The patient presented with multiple lead migrations, necessitating multiple revision surgeries with eventual frontal wound dehiscence. The choice was made to wrap the electrode in a pericranial flap to prevent recurrent lead migration. Two weeks postoperatively, the wound was well healed and the patient reported that the midline electrode was functioning properly. DISCUSSION: Pericranial flap revision confers little additional risk when compared with simple wound closure, and the surgeon can proceed without total electrode removal, additional incisions, or lead tunneling. The flap provides a highly vascular additional layer of stability to the electrode, reducing the likelihood of further lead exposure without compromising the efficacy of the device. These results suggest that endoscopic pericranial flap revision is a viable technique for the repair of occipital nerve stimulation lead erosions.
Asunto(s)
Electrodos/efectos adversos , Endoscopía/métodos , Seno Frontal/lesiones , Seno Frontal/cirugía , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Seno Frontal/diagnóstico por imagen , Cefalea/diagnóstico por imagen , Cefalea/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Cuero Cabelludo/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To characterize global differences in otitis media (OM)-related disease burden between socioeconomically advantaged and disadvantaged nations. METHODS: Using the Global Health Data Exchange, worldwide OM burden was evaluated using age-standardized disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) per 100,000 individuals in 183 countries from 1990 to 2015. Countries were organized by socioeconomic status using Human Development Index (HDI) values collected from the United Nations Development Program. Gini coefficients and concentration indices were employed to analyze disparities in OM disease burden. RESULTS: From 1990 to 2015, the mean DALY rate across all nations decreased by 21.9%. When considering disease burden in relation to socioeconomic status, age-standardized DALYs decreased as HDI values increased (pâ<â0.001). For both children and adults, DALY rates were significantly different between HDI groups (pâ<â0.01). Gini coefficients decreased from 0.821 in 1990 to 0.810 in 2015, indicating a modest reduction in international health inequality. Global disparities in OM disease burden, as measured by the concentration index, worsened from 1990 to 2010 before showing a small trend reversal in 2015. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first analysis investigating socioeconomic-related global disparities in OM disease burden using HDI values, Gini coefficients, and concentration indices. While the overall mean decrease in DALY rate from 1990 to 2015 is encouraging, the net decrease in concentration index during this period suggests less-developed nations continue to shoulder a disproportionate burden. Greater resource allocation to resource-poor nations may be warranted, as disease burden negatively impacts these countries to a greater degree.
Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Otitis Media/epidemiología , Adulto , Niño , Países Desarrollados , Países en Desarrollo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Clase SocialRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: As the US population ages, public health agencies have released guidelines encouraging aerobic activity and muscle-strengthening exercises among older individuals. Facial trauma from such activities among elderly individuals has long been underappreciated. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of recreational activity-associated facial fractures among older adults and to further delineate injury characteristics including demographics, fracture location, and specific activities. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System was used to collect data on emergency department visits from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2015, for individuals 55 years of age or older who sustained facial fractures from recreational activities. Individual entries were evaluated for activity code, fracture site, and demographics. Weighting data were used to extrapolate national incidence. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Incidence and location of facial fractures and associated recreational activity. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 20â¯519 emergency department visits for recreational activity-associated facial fractures among adults 55 years of age or older (8107 women and 12â¯412 men; mean [SD] age, 66.5 [9.1] years). The annual incidence of facial fractures increased by 45.3% from 2011 (n = 3174) through 2015 (n = 4612). Bicycling (26.6%), team sports (15.4%), outdoor activities (10.1%), and gardening (9.5%) were the most common causes of facial fractures. Walking and jogging caused 5.5% of fractures. In cases specifying site of fracture, nasal (65.4%) and orbital (14.1%) fractures were the most common. A greater proportion of men than women sustained bicycle-associated fractures (35.7% vs 14.9%; P = 3.1056 × 10-170), while more women than men sustained fractures associated with gardening (15.5% vs 6.1%; P = 2.1029 × 10-97), outdoor activities (14.6% vs 7.7%; P = 4.3156 × 10-50), and gym exercise (7.7% vs 1.3%; P = 3.0281 × 10-114). Men harbored a greater likelihood than women of orbital (14.9% vs 12.8%; P = 6.1468 × 10-5) and mandible fractures (9.3% vs 2.0%; P = 9.3760 × 10-64). Walking and jogging and gardening comprised a greater proportion of injuries in older cohorts. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Facial fractures sustained from recreational activity increased by 45.3% during a 5-year period among older adults. Although bicycling was the most common activity facilitating these injuries, many other pursuits represent areas of concern. Nasal fractures predominated, although orbital fractures increased with age. These findings offer areas for targeted prevention and provide valuable information for patient counseling. Furthermore, initiatives encouraging greater activity among this population may need to be accompanied by guidelines for injury prevention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Faciales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Faciales/etiología , Recreación , Fracturas Craneales/epidemiología , Fracturas Craneales/etiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: This study investigates the financial burden of medical malpractice litigation associated with rhytidectomies, as well as factors that contribute to litigation and poor defendant outcomes, which can help guide physician practices. OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively evaluate rhytidectomy malpractice litigation. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Jury verdict and settlement reports related to rhytidectomy malpractice litigations were obtained using the Westlaw Next database. Use of medical malpractice in conjunction with several terms for rhytidectomy, to account for the various procedure names associated with the procedure, yielded 155 court cases. Duplicate and nonrelevant cases were removed, and 89 cases were included in the analysis and reviewed for outcomes, defendant specialty, payments, and other allegations raised in proceedings. Data were collected from November 21, 2015, to December 25, 2015. Data analysis took place from December 25, 2015, to January 20, 2016. RESULTS: A total of 89 cases met our inclusion criteria. Most plaintiffs were female (81 of 88 with known sex [92%]), and patient age ranged from 40 to 76 years (median age, 56 years). Fifty-three (60%) were resolved in the defendant's favor, while the remaining 36 cases (40%) were resolved with either a settlement or a plaintiff verdict payment. The mean payment was $1.4 million. A greater proportion of cases involving plastic surgeon defendants were resolved with payment compared with cases involving defendants with ear, nose, and throat specialty (15 [36%] vs 4 [24%]). The most common allegations raised in litigation were intraoperative negligence (61 [69%]), poor cosmesis or disfigurement (57 [64%]), inadequate informed consent (30 [34%]), additional procedures required (14 [16%]), postoperative negligence (12 [14%]), and facial nerve injury (10 [11%]). Six cases (7%) involved alleged negligence surrounding a "lifestyle-lift" procedure, which tightens or oversews the superficial muscular aponeurosis system layer. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, although most cases of rhytidectomy malpractice litigation were resolved in the defendant's favor, cases resulting in payments created substantial financial burden for the defendants. Common factors cited by plaintiffs for pursuing litigation included dissatisfaction with cosmetic outcomes and perceived deficits in informed consent. These factors reinforce the importance of a comprehensive, preoperative informed consent process in which the specific potential risks and outcomes are presented by the surgeon to the patient to limit or avoid postsurgical allegations. Intraoperative negligence and facial nerve injury were significantly more likely to result in poor defendant outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.
Asunto(s)
Testimonio de Experto/legislación & jurisprudencia , Traumatismos del Nervio Facial/diagnóstico , Traumatismos del Nervio Facial/etiología , Consentimiento Informado/legislación & jurisprudencia , Mala Praxis/legislación & jurisprudencia , Satisfacción del Paciente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Ritidoplastia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adulto , Anciano , Comunicación , Compensación y Reparación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Neoplasias del Oído/patología , Oído Medio , Parálisis Facial/etiología , Paraganglioma/patología , Vértigo/etiología , Anciano , Neoplasias del Oído/complicaciones , Neoplasias del Oído/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Paraganglioma/complicaciones , Paraganglioma/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Despite the increasing role of mobile applications (apps) in patient education, there has been little inquiry evaluating the quality of these resources. Because poor health literacy has been associated with inferior health outcomes, evaluating the quality of patient education materials takes on great importance. Our objective was to employ validated readability tools for the evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) mobile apps. METHODS: GERD-specific apps found in the Apple App Store (Apple Inc., Cupertino CA) were evaluated using the Readability Studio Professional Version 2015 for Windows (Oleander Software, Ltd, Vandalia, OH). All text was evaluated using nine validated algorithms measuring readability including Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook grading, Gunning Fog index, Coleman-Liau, New Fog Count formula, Raygor Readability Estimate, FORCAST, Fry graph, and Flesch Reading Ease score. RESULTS: Average reading grade levels for individual GERD apps ranged from 9.6 to 12.9 (interquartile range 10.3-12). The average reading grade level for all apps analyzed was 11.1 ± 0.2 standard error of the mean (SEM), with an average Flesch Reading Ease score for all mobile apps analyzed of 51 ± 2.05 (SEM), falling into the "fairly difficult" category given by this measure. Raygor Readability estimates that most mobile apps have a reading grade level between 10 and 12, with the majority of this outcome due to long words. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates the feasibility of assessing readability of mobile health apps. Our findings suggest significant gaps in potential comprehension between the apps analyzed and the average reader, diminishing the utility of these resources. We hope our findings influence future mobile health-related app development and thereby improve patient outcomes in GERD and other chronic diseases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA. Laryngoscope, 127:1775-1779, 2017.