The Significance of Inflow Artery and Tourniquet Derived Cephalic Vein Diameters on Predicting Successful Use and Patency of Arteriovenous Fistulas for Haemodialysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the significance of inflow artery and cephalic vein diameters on predicting patency of radiocephalic and brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs). DESIGN: Single centre study with retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data between November 2010 and July 2015. METHODS: A detailed history and physical examination was undertaken, including age, gender, history and duration of haemodialysis, cause of chronic kidney disease, and the presence of comorbidities/risk factors. Pre-operative arterial and venous upper extremity mapping was performed and inner vessel diameter was recorded, using a tourniquet for the veins. Outcome measures included AVF use (functionality), primary, primary assisted, secondary, and functional secondary patency. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty five AVFs (57 and 78 radiocephalic and brachiocephalic AVFs, respectively) were constructed and followed up for 5 years. A cephalic vein diameter <4.3 mm (lower three quartiles) was the single independent predictor of inferior secondary and also functional secondary patency of radiocephalic AVFs (p = .02, HR 11.2, 95% CI 1.44-90.9). A brachial artery diameter ≤4.1 mm (lowest quartile) was an independent predictor of AVF functionality (57% vs. 83% for larger arteries, p = .017), and inferior primary, primary assisted, secondary, and functional secondary patency of brachiocephalic AVFs (primary assisted patency 21.9% vs. 55.9% at 3 years, p = .001/log-rank test, HR 3.1, p = .002/Cox regression). The presence of lower extremity PAD or use of dual antithrombotics was also independently associated with an inferior secondary patency. The number of risk factors (brachial artery diameter ≤4.1 mm, PAD, and use of dual antithrombotics) demonstrated risk stratification capabilities for functional secondary patency. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing radiocephalic AVFs, a tourniquet derived cephalic vein diameter <4.3 mm was the single independent predictor of inferior secondary and functional secondary patency. Among patients undergoing brachiocephalic AVFs, all patency rates were inferior in the presence of a brachial artery diameter ≤4.1 mm and secondary patency was inferior in the presence of multiple risk factors.

Outcome of transplantation in renal allograft recipients from cadaveric donors with standard and expanded criteria: a single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: The increasing number of patients requiring kidney transplantation and the lack of available organs has led to the utilization of kidneys from expanded criteria donors (ECD). AIM: The comparison of the clinical outcome of renal transplantation, performed in a single center, between allograft recipients from standard (SCD) and expanded criteria donors (ECD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 215 cadaveric renal transplantations performed during a 16 year period at the University Hospital of Patras were retrospectively studied. Donors' and recipients' characteristics (gender, age, history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, cold ischemia time, post-transplant and long term graft function) were analyzed. RESULTS: Grafts from donors with expanded criteria (ECD, n = 53) were allocated to older recipients whereas grafts from donors with standard criteria (SCD, n = 162) were allocated to younger recipients. The mean cold ischemia time was 1,146 min and was similar between the two groups of patients. Patients' survival rates were similar between allograft recipients from SCD and ECD up to the 5(th) post-transplant year of follow-up. Graft survival was significantly better in allograft recipients from SCD during a 5-year follow-up period. A significantly lower eGFR was noted in allograft recipients from ECD in comparison to those from SCD throughout the observation period. Cold ischemia time was positively correlated to the development of DGF, while patients with DGF had significantly worse graft function throughout the observation period. CONCLUSION: Patient survival from ECD is comparable to that from SCD but graft survival is significantly lower. However, since renal function of recipients from ECD is adequate for long term period, grafts from ECD should be used in older patients.