Liquid biopsy as a tool for KRAS/NRAS/BRAF baseline testing in metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The absence of KRAS and NRAS gene mutations (RAS wild type) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), is associated with a good response to targeted therapy with anti-EGFR receptor antibodies. The current gold standard for RAS mutational status identification is genetic testing on tissue biopsy samples. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the relevance of liquid biopsy as a less invasive alternative to tissue biopsy for detecting KRAS/NRAS and BRAF mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The study also aimed to determine the concordance between liquid biopsy and tissue biopsy. METHODS: This is a phase IV, observational, uncontrolled, non-comparative, non-randomized, open label study. RAS/BRAF status will be tested at baseline using tissue and liquid biopsy using the Idylla/Biocartis PCR-based device. The primary endpoint is the comparison of the RAS status based on liquid biopsy with the RAS status based on tissue biopsy. RESULTS: 100 patients with mCRC were included in the study. 75% of patients showed concordant results between liquid biopsy and tissue biopsy, while 25% had discordant results. Liquid biopsy demonstrated a sensitivity of 62% and a specificity of 93%. The accuracy of liquid biopsy was 75%, with a moderate agreement between the two tests. The most frequent mutations in concordant cases were in KRAS (41%), followed by NRAS (4%) and BRAF (3%). Mutations were not detected in 42% of tissue biopsy samples and 60% of liquid biopsy samples. The presence of hepatic metastases did not significantly affect the concordance between the biopsy methods. CONCLUSION: Liquid biopsy using the Idylla™ system showed a relatively low sensitivity but high specificity for detecting KRAS/NRAS and BRAF mutations in mCRC patients. Despite some discordant cases, liquid biopsy remains a promising alternative to tissue biopsy due to its non-invasiveness, ability to provide multiple samples, and better representation of tumor heterogeneity.

Management of Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in Emerging Markets (EM): An Expert Opinion.

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the 10th most common cancer globally with an almost 4 times higher prevalence in men. The main risk factors for development of urothelial carcinoma are advanced age, smoking, arsenic contamination, exposure to carcinogens. Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) has overall poor prognosis with a 5-year overall survival rate of only < 5%. The standard of care comprises of platinum-based chemotherapy, but the responses are often not sustained. A working group was established with an objective to discuss the most recent clinical data on the genitourinary tumors of interest and comprised of experts across Latin America, Emerging Asia (except China, Japan, and South Korea), Africa, and the Middle East (known as Emerging Markets or EM). There is an evident disparity in terms of uneven mortality and incidence rate distribution among various regions. There is a lack and/or insufficient data on epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes in the EM. The lack of registries impacts the healthcare decisions and the lower incidence from the region might not be reflective of the true disease burden. The treatment outcomes of mUC can be improved by understanding the current disease burden and treatment approach of mUC and identifying the gaps and challenges associated with management. Hence, a literature review was developed to summarize the current disease burden and treatment approach of mUC across EM. The review also highlights the unmet needs for mUC management in EM and suggests a way forward to improve the current situation in order to better serve the patients.

Genetic markers of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a retrospective study of 312 patients from a reference center in Lebanon.

Aim: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a highly heterogenous hemopathy. Genetic stratification of CLL patients has important prognostic and therapeutic values - mainly immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene (IGHV) mutational status and the presence of cytogenetic abnormalities. The genetics of CLL in Lebanon is scarcely described in the literature. Patients & methods: In this work, we studied the genetic biomarkers of 312 Lebanese CLL patients. Results: Prominent IGHV genes were IGHV4-34, IGHV1-69 and IGHV3-30; and CLL #1 and #5 presented major subsets. Some similarities as well as major differences were highlighted when comparing our data with previously published data. Conclusion: The distribution of IGHV alleles in our series differed from previously described distributions, suggesting involvement of antigenic selection and regional variables in CLL pathogenesis.

Renal cell carcinoma management: real-world practice and challenges at a national level.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) management has seen a revolution over the last decades. Six Lebanese oncologists discussed recent updates in RCC management and outlined the challenges and future directions in Lebanon. Sunitinib continues to be a first-line choice for metastatic RCC in Lebanon, except for intermediate- and poor-risk patients. Immunotherapy is not always accessible to patients or selected routinely as first-line therapy. More data are needed on the sequencing of immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments and on the use of immunotherapy beyond progression and/or after failure of immunotherapy in the first-line setting. For second-line management, the clinical experience with axitinib for low tumor growth rate and nivolumab after progression on tyrosine kinase inhibitors make those two agents the most widely used. Several challenges affect the Lebanese practice, limiting the accessibility and availability of the medications. Reimbursement remains the most critical challenge, especially with the socioeconomic crisis of October 2019.

Clinical and genetic factors associated with self-reported cognitive deficits in women with breast cancer: the "CAGE-Cog" study.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment are at particular risk of experiencing acute cognitive impairment leading to daily challenges in decision-making and reduced quality of life and functional autonomy. The aim was to assess the relationship between clinical and genetic factors and cognitive function in a sample of patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out between November 2017 and June 2019 on women (N = 112) treated for breast cancer by intravenous chemotherapy at the oncology outpatient unit of Hôtel-Dieu de France Hospital, Beirut. Patients were evaluated with the 37-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog). Other validated scales were also used to assess depression, anxiety, sleep disorders, pain, and fatigue. DNA was obtained by a buccal swab (FTA®technology) for genotyping of different genes (ABCB1, COMT, DRD2, OPRM1, CLOCK, CRY2, and PER2) using the Lightcycler®(Roche). RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 56.04 years. Multivariable analysis, taking the four FACT-Cog subscores as the dependent variables, showed that the mean cognitive score decreased with higher depression, anxiety, and insomnia scores. Patients with university education levels had better perceived cognitive abilities than those with primary education. Moreover, carrying the G allele for the OPRM1 polymorphism (c.118A > G;rs197791) was significantly associated with a better cognitive function compared to AA patients (B = 2.05; p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive oncological care plan should include a personalized assessment of all factors related to cognitive functioning in cancer patients, particularly anxiety and depression, to achieve an optimal patient outcome.

Palbociclib and letrozole in hormone-receptor positive advanced breast cancer: Predictive response and prognostic factors.

CDK 4/6 inhibitors have been yielding propitious results when with hormone therapy in the management of Her2-negative and hormone-receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer, palbociclib being one of the first molecules investigated in this setting. However, the response to CDK4/6 inhibitors is variable. To identify predictive and prognostic factors of response to this therapeutic regimen. Eligible patients were females with HR+ and Her2- advanced breast cancer, receiving Palbociclib in combination with Letrozole. PFS was the primary endpoint in the evaluation of response to treatment. This survival was then further segregated according to various characteristics: histological (type, grade, hormone receptors), metastatic site, line of treatment, response type at initial assessment, and best response achieved. The data was then processed by two statistical analysis models: Kaplan-Meier and univariate preceding multivariate Cox proportional risks. Sixty patients were included and followed for a median follow-up duration of 15.98 months. PFS recorded a median of 19.07 months (95% CI=15.43-22.71). PFS had a median of 12.99 months in the absence of progesterone receptors (vs 20.05 months in the case of positive estrogen and progesterone receptors; P = 0.046), a median of 13.02 months in the presence of liver metastases (vs 22.98 months in the absence of liver metastases; P = 0.007), and 15.94 months in the case of second-line and beyond (vs 22.98 months in the case of first-line; P = 0.033). Regarding the Hazard Ratio of progression, we note age (HR 0.941; P = 0.019), liver metastases (HR 2.751; P = 0.051), response at initial evaluation (HR<1; P < 0.001) and best response (HR<1; P = 0.003). PFS reached similar figures to those of international studies. The absence of progesterone receptors, presence of liver metastases, and use as second-line or beyond are associated with a reduced median PFS. One year age increase (protective factor), liver metastases (risk factor), response at initial evaluation, and best response achieved are identified as the most predictive factors of the response to this treatment regimen and of the progression risk.

Perceptions of the COVID-19 vaccine among patients with cancer: a single-institution survey.

Aims: This paper reports the results of a survey assessing the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine among patients with cancer. Patients and methods: In total, 111 adult patients with cancer from a single institution were asked to complete a questionnaire designed to assess their knowledge about the vaccine, their readiness to be vaccinated and the determinants of their decision. Results: 61.3% of the patients considered themselves more vulnerable to COVID-19 than the general population. Television, radio and newspapers were the major sources of information about the vaccine. A total of 55% of the patients were ready to be vaccinated and 14.4% refused the vaccine. The main reason for refusal was incompatibility with patients' disease or treatment. Conclusion: Most of the patients in this institutional sample accepted the COVID-19 vaccine. Better communication of information with patients is needed to decrease vaccine hesitancy.

Lay abstract Major cancer societies consider vaccinating patients with cancer against COVID-19 a priority. The investigators conducted a survey assessing perceptions of the vaccine among patients with cancer. A total of 111 patients were asked to complete a questionnaire evaluating their knowledge about the vaccine, their readiness to be vaccinated and the determinants of their decision. Most (61.3%) patients considered themselves more susceptible to COVID-19 than the general population. Television, radio and newspapers were the major sources of information about the vaccine. The majority of patients (55%) were ready to be vaccinated and 14.4% refused the vaccine. The main reason for refusal was incompatibility with patients' disease or treatment. Better communication with patients is needed to decrease vaccine hesitancy.

Safety and efficacy of pazopanib as a second-line treatment and beyond for soft tissue sarcomas: A real-life tertiary-center experience in the MENA region.

INTRODUCTION: Sarcomas are uncommon malignancies. No advances have been recently achieved despite multiple efforts. Pazopanib is a safe and effective tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in managing soft tissue sarcomas (STS) after chemotherapy failure. However, its use is limited in developing countries and no efficacy data exist from our region. We aimed to study the efficacy of pazopanib in our population, characterized by response rates of patients with chemotherapy-refractory advanced STS receiving pazopanib. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity profile. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 15 patients (age≥18 year) diagnosed with advanced STS, refractory to first-line chemotherapy, receiving pazopanib as ≥second-line therapy in one tertiary center in Lebanon were included between January 1st, 2014 and October 31st, 2018. Patient and disease characteristics, disease evaluation, as well as tolerance to treatment, were extracted from charts retrospectively. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 24. RESULTS: The mean age was 48.6 [19-66] years. Eleven patients (73.3%) received pazopanib in second-line, whereas four patients (26.7%) received it in third-line. Thirteen patients (86.7%) progressed, and two patients (13.3%) had stable disease. The median PFS was three months [1-19] and the mean OS was 25.4 months [17.2-33.6]. Five patients required dose-reductions due to poor tolerance. CONCLUSION: Conclusions cannot be drawn due to small patient numbers. However, given the 3-month PFS, 13% of patients maintaining stable disease, and tolerable safety profile, it is reasonable to incorporate pazopanib in STS treatment. More focused studies with larger patient populations need to be done in Lebanon.

Should we screen patients with hematologic malignancies for COVID-19?

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has posed several challenges to the hematology community to re-organize the medical care of patients with hematologic malignancies. Whereas the oncology societies favored a more or less conservative approach which considered the possibility of delaying treatment administration on a case-by-case basis, the hematology community guidelines were less stringent and recommended adequate individualized regimens. As countries are de-escalating the lockdown and the medical community is unable to foresee the end of the current outbreak will and whether the pandemic would eventually come back as a seasonal infection, there is interest in screening of patients with hematology malignancies with COVID-19 instead of limiting access to curative treatments. The rapidly accumulating knowledge about COVID-19 allows a better understanding of the diagnostic tools that may be potentially used in screening. Herein, we briefly review the pathophysiology of COVID-19, the rationale of screening of patients with hematologic malignancies, tools for screening, and available guidelines.

TRK inhibition in soft tissue sarcomas: A comprehensive review.

Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) are a group of rare mesenchymal tumors that constitutes ∼1% of all solid tumors. It remains a rare tumor which lacks effective treatment options. Precision oncology may be of interest in this regard by identifying potential targets for emerging novel therapies. Neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) fusions are rare oncogenic driver mutations found in a broad range of common and rare tumor subtypes including STS. The recent approvals of NTRK inhibitors (larotrectinib and entrectinib) represent new therapeutic options in the drug armamentarium especially valuable in advanced STS given the paucity of treatment options and the generally poor prognosis of these tumors. We review the methods used to detect NTRK fusions in STS with focus on incidence, diagnosis and management of these rare and intriguing oncogenic targets.

Comprehensive tumor profiling-guided therapy in rare or refractory solid cancer: A feasibility study in daily clinical practice.

Tumor profiling has been shown to benefit patients with rare or refractory metastatic cancer, but several limitations hamper its use in daily clinical practice. We aim to assess the added benefit of a comprehensive tumor profiling, including factors predictive of response to targeted and cytotoxic therapy, in the treatment of refractory or rare solid tumors outside of a formal clinical trial. Patients were included between 2013 and 2017. Multiplatform comprehensive tumor profiling (CTP) was performed on FFPE specimens. Tumor response was evaluated by imaging using the RECIST criteria version 1.1. The PFS ratio was defined as PFS under CTP-guided therapy (PFS2)/PFS under previous standard therapy (PFS1). A clinical benefit was identified if the PFS ratio exceeded the 1.3 threshold value. In total, 184 patients were enrolled among whom 104 were evaluable for the PFS ratio. Objective response rates (ORR) were equal to 25% (CI95: 16.6-33.4%) and 36.5% (CI95: 27.2-45.8%) on the last therapy before CTP and on the CTP-guided therapy respectively (P-value=0.058 on paired proportion comparison test). The proportion of patients achieving a PFS2/PFS1 ratio≥1.3 was equal to 50%. The median PFS1 was statistically lower than PFS2 (120 days compared to 184 days respectively, P-value log rank 0.01). These results confirm the feasibility and the added benefit of a CTP in patients with refractory tumors in daily clinical practice especially in patients not able to enter a clinical trial.

The interaction of immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: subadditivity, additivity or synergism?

The hypothesis that the interaction of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is synergistic has not been formally validated. The frontline ICI Phase II/III trials in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were reviewed for the objective response rates (ORRs) and grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) of ICI-chemotherapy combinations and those of each individual drug. The expected ORR and grade 3-5 AE of ICI-chemotherapy combinations were computed as the arithmetic sum of the pooled effects of each drug. Statistical pooling was performed using a double arcsine transformation and a random-effects model. Our findings suggest an enhanced effect that is less than additive for the ICI-chemotherapy combinations since the actual ORR and grade 3-5 AE were found to be less than the expected additive effect.

Untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Lebanese patients: an observational study using standard karyotyping and FISH.

AIM: We aimed to understand the biology of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients in Lebanon. MATERIALS & METHODS: We applied conventional cytogenetic and FISH studies on Lebanese patients diagnosed with CLL and undergoing a watch and wait approach. RESULTS: Our study disclosed 53.6% of patients with aberrant karyotypes among which 26.7% were complex karyotypes. Genetic aberrations included del(13q14) 46.4%, 14q32 translocation in 25%, trisomy 12 in 14.3%, del(17p13) and del(11q22) in 7.1% each. The deletion of 6q21/6q23 was not found in any of our patients. CONCLUSION: The higher prevalence of del(13q14) as a sole abnormality could be the primary event in inducing CLL. The del(17p13) and del(11q22) followed as potential drivers for progression in CLL patients with a watch and wait approach.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors renal side effects and management.

The choice of immunotherapy in the treatment of cancer has improved the prognosis of many patients affected by various malignancies. The high expectations foreseen with immunotherapy have led to fast approvals despite the incomplete understanding of the toxicity profiles in the different organs, including the kidneys. The high prevalence of chronic kidney disease in cancer patients complicates the issue further and requires a better knowledge of the renal safety profile to ensure an optimal safe treatment. This review summarizes the present knowledge of renal adverse events secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitors and discusses their pathophysiology, clinical presentation and adequate management. We also advocate the need for a multidisciplinary approach in patients with immune-related toxic adverse events.

Informational Needs of Women with Breast Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Research in the field of informational needs of breast cancer patients is scarce. In the few published articles, these needs were usually not satisfied. The main objective of this study was to evaluate satisfaction regarding informational needs in women with breast cancer. The long-term goal was to guide physician-patient communication to meet these needs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey with 21 questions was completed by 84 female patients receiving chemotherapy in a one-day hospital in Beirut, Lebanon. All patients were aware of their disease and agreed to participate in the survey. RESULTS: The doctor was the major source of information for patients followed by media (radio and television). The level of knowledge of patients concerning their disease was proportional to the number of information sources. Women aged younger than 45 years, diagnosed during the last three months before the survey and certified from high school were less satisfied with information given by the oncologist. The missing information was in relation with the steps of the treatment after the chemotherapy regimen, the risk of a family member (sisters and daughters) of developing the disease and management of lymphedema. CONCLUSIONS: This study generated a scale for the degree of satisfaction of information received by women with breast cancer from their oncologist. The physician can use this scale to improve his or her skills of communication to patients and diminish their level of fear and anxiety.