Effect of biocompatibility of hemodialysis membranes on mortality in acute renal failure: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The effect of biocompatibility of hemodialysis membranes on mortality in acute renal failure (ARF) has been a subject of intense debate, with some, but not all studies reporting a lower risk of death among patients with ARF dialyzed with biocompatible membranes (BCM) compared to bioincompatible membranes (BICM). OBJECTIVES: We performed a meta-analysis of group data extracted from previously published studies of controlled clinical trials to assess the impact of BCM on the mortality among patients with ARF who required intermittent hemodialysis (IHD). METHODS: BCM and BICM were defined as synthetic and cellulose-derived membranes (cuprophan and cellulose acetate), respectively. All controlled clinical trials comparing the effect of BCM to BICM on clinical outcomes in the setting of ARF were included. Original articles as well as abstracts were included. Data in Tables, Figures, and text were independently extracted by 2 of the authors. Risk ratios (RR) for mortality were combined using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Seven studies with a total of 722 patients met the inclusion criteria. One hundred seventy-two (45%) of 384 patients died in the BCM group, compared with 156 (46%) of 338 patients in the BICM group. The RRs for mortality ranged from 0.56-1.28. Overall, the pooled RR for mortality was 0.92 (95% CI = 0.76-1.13) in favor of the BCM group. However, the test for heterogeneity in RR among studies was significant (chi2 = 8.6, p < 0.05). One study accounted for this significance, and once removed from the model, the RR for mortality was 0.94 (95% CI = 0.79-1.12), and the test for heterogeneity among studies lost its significance. Subgroup analyses comparing BCM to cuprophan membranes revealed that the RR for mortality was 0.82 (95% CI = 0.62 - 1.08) in favor of the BCM group, whereas in the subgroup of studies comparing BCM to cellulose acetate, the RR for mortality was 1.11 (95% CI = 0.87-1.44) in favor of the BCM group. CONCLUSION: This metaanalysis demonstrates that the use of BCM does not significantly affect mortality among patients with ARF who require IHD. However, subgroup analyses suggest that cellulose acetate membranes may offer a survival advantage when compared with synthetic membranes, which, in turn, may be more beneficial than cuprophan membranes. Available evidence does not permit a recommendation for or against the use of BCM in ARF. Large trials and pooled analyses of individual patient-level data will be required to assess sources of variability among studies and non-fatal outcomes of ARF.

Impact of dialyzer membrane selection on cellular responses in acute renal failure: a crossover study.

BACKGROUND: When acute renal failure (ARF) is severe enough to require dialysis, in-hospital mortality rates approach 60%. These alarming figures have been ascribed in part to advanced age and the high prevalence of comorbid conditions. In the past several years, a number of attempts have been made to investigate the impact of dialyzer membrane type on clinical outcomes. Unfortunately, to date, clinical studies addressing this question have reported conflicting results. METHODS: This crossover study examined the effect of dialyzer membrane type on cytokine synthesis by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), superoxide release by neutrophils, and apoptosis or programmed cell death of neutrophils in 24 patients with ARF requiring intermittent hemodialysis. The patients were assigned in an alternate order to a low-flux cellulose acetate (CA) or polysulfone (PS) dialyzer. After three consecutive dialysis sessions, patients were crossed over to the second dialyzer for three additional treatments. These cellular responses were measured upon dialyzer assignment and at the third and sixth dialysis session in relationship to the dialyzer type. RESULTS: The results of the study showed no impact of dialyzer biocompatibility on synthesis of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) or interleukin 10 (IL-10) by PBMCs, superoxide release by neutrophils, or neutrophil apoptosis. This held true regardless of the initial dialyzer assignment. Furthermore, there was no correlation between dialysis adequacy (measured by single-pool Kt/V) and postdialysis cellular responses. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, this study refines the question of biocompatibility by comparing a substituted cellulose rather than unsubstituted cellulose dialyzer to a PS dialyzer in the setting of ARF. The results failed to demonstrate a dialyzer advantage on the selected cellular responses.

Impact of intermittent hemodialysis variables on clinical outcomes in acute renal failure.

When hospital-acquired acute renal failure (ARF) is severe enough to require renal replacement therapy, mortality rates are extremely high, exceeding 50%. The potential impact of renal replacement therapy on clinical outcomes in ARF remains a subject of ongoing investigation and controversy. This article reviews in depth all of the clinical trials that have examined the effect of dialysis-related variables on clinical outcomes in patients with ARF requiring intermittent hemodialysis. In particular, the role of biocompatibility of dialyzer membranes, and timing, intensity, and adequacy of dialysis are discussed.