Asia-Pacific consensus on the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: an update focusing on refractory reflux disease and Barrett's oesophagus

"OBJECTIVE: Since the publication of the Asia-Pacific consensus on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in 2008, there has been further scientific advancement in this field. This updated consensus focuses on proton pump inhibitor-refractory reflux disease and Barrett's oesophagus. METHODS: A steering committee identified three areas to address: (1) burden of disease and diagnosis of reflux disease; (2) proton pump inhibitor-refractory reflux disease; (3) Barrett's oesophagus. Three working groups formulated draft statements with supporting evidence. Discussions were done via email before a final face-to-face discussion. We used a Delphi consensus process, with a 70% agreement threshold, using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria to categorise the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 32 statements were proposed and 31 were accepted by consensus. A rise in the prevalence rates of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Asia was noted, with the majority being non-erosive reflux disease. Overweight and obesity contributed to the rise. Proton pump inhibitor-refractory reflux disease was recognised to be common. A distinction was made between refractory symptoms and refractory reflux disease, with clarification of the roles of endoscopy and functional testing summarised in two algorithms. The definition of Barrett's oesophagus was revised such that a minimum length of 1 cm was required and the presence of intestinal metaplasia no longer necessary. We recommended the use of standardised endoscopic reporting and advocated endoscopic therapy for confirmed dysplasia and early cancer. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines standardise the management of patients with refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's oesophagus in the Asia-Pacific region."

Review article: acute severe ulcerative colitis - evidence-based consensus statements.

BACKGROUND: Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a potentially life-threatening complication of ulcerative colitis. AIM: To develop consensus statements based on a systematic review of the literature of the management of ASUC to improve patient outcome. METHODS: Following a literature review, the Delphi method was used to develop the consensus statements. A steering committee, based in Australia, generated the statements of interest. Three rounds of anonymous voting were carried out to achieve the final results. Acceptance of statements was pre-determined by ≥80% votes in 'complete agreement' or 'agreement with minor reservation'. RESULTS: Key recommendations include that patients with ASUC should be: hospitalised, undergo unprepared flexible sigmoidoscopy to assess severity and to exclude cytomegalovirus colitis, and be provided with venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and intravenous hydrocortisone 100 mg three or four times daily with close monitoring by a multidisciplinary team. Rescue therapy such as infliximab or ciclosporin should be started if insufficient response by day 3, and colectomy considered if no response to 7 days of rescue therapy or earlier if deterioration. With such an approach, it is expected that colectomy rate during admission will be below 30% and mortality less than 1% in specialist centres. CONCLUSION: These evidenced-based consensus statements on acute severe ulcerative colitis, developed by a multidisciplinary group, provide up-to-date best practice recommendations that improve and harmonise management as well as provide auditable quality assessments.

Smoking prevalence and its influence on disease course and surgery in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Smoking demonstrates divergent effects in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Smoking frequency is greater in CD and deleterious to its disease course. Conversely, UC is primarily a disease of nonsmokers and ex-smokers, with reports of disease amelioration in active smoking. AIM: To determine the prevalence of smoking and its effects on disease progression and surgery in a well-characterised cohort of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) patients. METHODS: Patients with smoking data of the Sydney IBD Cohort were included. Demographic, phenotypic, medical, surgical and hospitalisation data were analysed and reported on the basis of patient smoking status. RESULTS: 1203 IBD patients were identified comprising 626 CD and 557 UC with 6725 and 6672 patient-years of follow-up, respectively. CD patients were more likely to smoke than UC patients (19.2% vs. 10.2%, P < 0.001). A history of smoking in CD was associated with an increased proportional surgery rate (45.8% vs. 37.8%, P = 0.045), requirement for IBD-related hospitalisation (P = 0.009) and incidence of peripheral arthritis (29.8% vs. 22.0%, P = 0.027). Current smokers with UC demonstrated reduced corticosteroid utilisation (24.1% vs. 37.5%, P = 0.045), yet no reduction in the rates of colectomy (3.4% vs. 6.6%, P = 0.34) or hospital admission (P = 0.25) relative to nonsmokers. Ex-smokers with UC required proportionately greater immunosuppressive (36.2% vs. 26.3%, P = 0.041) and corticosteroid (43.7% vs. 34.5%, P = 0.078) therapies compared with current and never smokers. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the detrimental effects of smoking in CD, yet failed to demonstrate substantial benefit from smoking in UC. These data should encourage all patients with IBD to quit smoking.

Patients' knowledge of pregnancy-related issues in inflammatory bowel disease and validation of a novel assessment tool ('CCPKnow').

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) require complex therapeutic decisions and life choices concerning pregnancy, but little is known about patient's knowledge of IBD and its treatment before and during pregnancy. AIM: To develop a novel tool (Crohn's and Colitis Pregnancy Knowledge Score 'CCPKnow') to assess knowledge of pregnancy-related issues in IBD. The validated tool was then applied to determine knowledge in patients. METHOD: Discriminate ability of 'CCPKnow' was validated in four groups with different levels of IBD knowledge. Reliability and readability were tested by Cronbach-α and Flesch-Kencaid. Construct validity was subsequently assessed against general IBD knowledge (CCKnow) in 145 women with IBD. Associations between patient factors and knowledge were studied. RESULTS: Median CCPKnow scores differed significantly between the validation groups (P < 0.001). CCPKnow displayed excellent internal consistency, reliability (Cronbach-α 0.94), readability (reading age 9 years) and close correlation with CCKnow (Spearman's ρ 0.64; P < 0.001). Of 145 patients, 44.8% had poor, 27.6% adequate, 17.3% good and only 10.3% very good knowledge. Better knowledge was associated with Caucasian ethnicity, higher income, having a partner, having children, Crohn's and Colitis Association membership, longer disease duration and Crohn's disease. CONCLUSIONS: Crohn's and Colitis Pregnancy Knowledge Score, a novel knowledge assessment tool of pregnancy and IBD, demonstrated excellent test characteristics. We found that nearly half of the women with IBD had poor knowledge, identifying a pressing need for better education.

An objective study of acid reflux and cough in children using an ambulatory pHmetry-cough logger.

OBJECTIVE: There are no objective ambulatory studies on the temporal relationship between reflux and cough in children. Commercial pHmetry loggers have slow capture rates (0.25 Hz) that limit objective quantification of reflux and cough. The authors aimed to evaluate if there is a temporal association between cough and acid pH in ambulatory children with chronic cough. DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: The authors studied children (aged <14 years) with chronic cough, suspected of acid reflux and considered for pHmetry using a specifically built ambulatory pHmetry-cough logger that enabled the simultaneous ambulatory recording of cough and pH with a fast (10 Hz) capture rate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Coughs within (before and after) 10, 30, 60 and 120 s of a reflux episode (pH<4 for >0.5 s). RESULTS: Analysis of 5628 coughs in 20 children. Most coughs (83.9%) were independent of a reflux event. Cough-reflux (median 19, IQR 3-45) and reflux-cough (24.5, 13-51) sequences were equally likely to occur within 120 s. Within the 10 and 30 s time frame, reflux-cough (10 s=median 2.5, IQR 0-7.25; 30 s=6.5, 1.25-22.25) sequences were significantly less frequent than reflux-no cough (10 s=27, IQR 15-65; 30 s=24.5, 14.5-55.5) sequences, (p=0.0001 and p=0.001, respectively). No differences were found for 60 and 120 s time frame. Cough-reflux sequence (median 1.0, IQR 0-8) within 10 s was significantly less (p=0.0001) than no cough-reflux sequences (median 29.5, 15-67), within 30 s (p=0.006) and 60 s (p=0.048) but not within 120 s (p=0.47). CONCLUSIONS: In children with chronic cough and suspected of having gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, the temporal relationship between acid reflux and cough is unlikely causal.

Who needs colonoscopy to identify colorectal cancer? Bowel symptoms do not add substantially to age and other medical history.

BACKGROUND: Many bodies advise that people with bowel symptoms undergo colonoscopy to detect colorectal cancer. AIM: To determine which bowel symptoms predict cancer on colonoscopy. METHODS: Information was collected on symptoms, demographics and medical history from patients subsequently undergoing colonoscopy. Multiple logistic regression modelling was used to identify predictors of colorectal cancer. An ROC curve was estimated for each model, and the area under the curve (AUC) was computed. RESULTS: Cancer was found in 159 patients and no cancer or adenoma in 7577 patients. Bowel symptoms that predicted cancer were rectal bleeding, change in bowel habit and rectal mucus. Prediction was the strongest in patients who had symptoms at least weekly and commencing within the previous 12 months; abdominal pain was predictive only in such patients. The odds ratios never exceeded 4.27. A model based on age, gender, and medical history was highly predictive (AUC = 0.79). Adding symptoms to this model increased the AUC to 0.85. CONCLUSIONS: This model predicts patients in whom colonoscopy will have the highest yield. Conversely, colonoscopy can be avoided in people at low risk: in our study, 95% of cancers could have been detected by doing only 60% of the colonoscopies.

Clinical trial: the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care--prospective randomized comparison of rabeprazole 20 mg with esomeprazole 20 and 40 mg.

BACKGROUND: A trial of empirical PPI therapy is usual practice for most patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in primary care. AIM: To determine if the 4-week efficacy of rabeprazole 20 mg for resolving heartburn and regurgitation symptoms is non-inferior to esomeprazole 40 mg or 20 mg. METHODS: In all, 1392 patients were randomized to rabeprazole 20 mg, esomeprazole 20 mg or 40 mg once daily. Patients, doctors and assessors were blinded. Symptom resolution data were collected on days 0-7 and day-28 using the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptom Severity Index with a shortened version used on days 8-27. RESULTS: Rabeprazole 20 mg was non-inferior to esomeprazole 40 mg for complete resolution of regurgitation and satisfactory resolution of heartburn and regurgitation. For complete heartburn resolution, the efficacy of rabeprazole 20 mg and esomeprazole 40 mg was statistically indistinguishable, although the non-inferiority test was inconclusive. Rabeprazole 20 mg was non-inferior to esomeprazole 20 mg for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In uninvestigated GERD patients, rabeprazole 20 mg was non-inferior to esomeprazole 40 mg for complete and satisfactory relief of regurgitation and satisfactory relief of heartburn, and not different for complete resolution of heartburn.

The effectiveness of rifabutin triple therapy for patients with difficult-to-eradicate Helicobacter pylori in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Failure of first line and subsequent Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy is a significant problem and alternative treatments are few. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of a rifabutin-based triple therapy in clinical practice and determine the optimal strategy for its use. METHODS: Patients referred after first or subsequent treatment failure were prescribed rifabutin triple therapy consisting of standard dose proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin 1 g and rifabutin 150 mg each b.d. for 10 days. RESULTS: In 67 patients, the main indications for treatment were dyspepsia (55%), peptic ulcer disease (24%) and increased gastric cancer risk (18%). The median number of previous treatments was 2 (range: 1-9). Eradication of Helicobacter pylori was achieved in 76% (48/63) per protocol and 72% (48/67) on an intention-to-treat basis. When used as second line therapy, 95% (18/19) achieved eradication compared with 68% (30/44) when two or more previous treatments had been used (P = 0.03). Outcome was independent of age, ethnicity, gender or indication for treatment. Adverse events were reported in 10%. CONCLUSION: Rifabutin triple therapy is a well tolerated and effective second line therapy in the treatment of persistent Helicobacter pylori; however, its efficacy decreases with increasing number of failed previous therapies.

Review article: from gastrin to gastro-oesophageal reflux disease--a century of acid suppression.

To commemorate Edkins' discovery of gastrin in 1905, we review a century of progress in the physiology and pathobiology of gastrin and acid secretion especially as it pertains to clinical aspects of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Although initially ignored, Edkins' observations eventually led to the enthusiastic investigation of gastrin and acid regulation in peptic ulcer disease, culminating in important therapeutic advances in the management of acid peptic disease. Following the improved understanding of gastric secretory physiology, and the development of acid suppressants with increasing efficacy, the use of surgical intervention for peptic ulcer disease was almost eliminated. Surgery became obsolete with the discovery of Helicobacter pylori. Three other advances are also influencing modern practice: the gastrotoxicity of aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is now increasingly appreciated, the role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and therapy of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and the use of intravenous acid-suppressive agents. The major issue for the future resides within the epidemic of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. How to diagnose, categorize and treat this condition and how to identify and prevent neoplasia, are the challenges of the new century.

Esomeprazole 20 mg vs. pantoprazole 20 mg for maintenance therapy of healed erosive oesophagitis: results from the EXPO study.

BACKGROUND: Following initial healing of erosive oesophagitis, most patients require maintenance therapy to prevent relapse. AIM: To compare endoscopic and symptomatic remission rates over 6 months' maintenance therapy with esomeprazole or pantoprazole (both 20 mg once daily) in patients with healed erosive oesophagitis. METHODS: Patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and endoscopically confirmed erosive oesophagitis at baseline were randomized to receive esomeprazole 40 mg or pantoprazole 40 mg for up to 8 weeks. Patients with healed erosive oesophagitis and free of moderate/severe heartburn and acid regurgitation at 4 weeks or, if necessary, 8 weeks entered the 6-month maintenance therapy phase of the study. RESULTS: A total of 2766 patients (63% men; mean age 50 years) received esomeprazole 20 mg (n = 1377) or pantoprazole 20 mg (n = 1389) and comprised the intention-to-treat population. Following 6 months of treatment, the proportion of patients in endoscopic and symptomatic remission was significantly greater for those receiving esomeprazole 20 mg (87.0%) than pantoprazole 20 mg (74.9%, log-rank test P < 0.0001). Esomeprazole 20 mg produced a higher proportion of patients free of moderate to severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms and fewer discontinuations because of symptoms than pantoprazole 20 mg (92.2% vs. 88.5%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole 20 mg is more effective than pantoprazole 20 mg for maintenance therapy following initial healing of erosive oesophagitis and relief of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms.

The C-caffeine breath test distinguishes significant fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B and reflects response to lamivudine therapy.

BACKGROUND: The 13C-caffeine breath test is a non-invasive, quantitative test of liver function. AIM: To determine the utility of the 13C-caffeine breath test in chronic hepatitis B virus and its ability to monitor response to lamivudine. METHODS: Forty-eight chronic hepatitis B virus patients and 24 controls underwent the 13C-caffeine breath test. In 28 patients commenced on lamivudine, 13C-caffeine breath tests were performed at 1 week (n = 12) and after 1 year of therapy. RESULTS: Patients with Metavir F0-1 fibrosis (2.30 +/- 1.02 Delta per thousand per 100 mg caffeine) had a 13C-caffeine breath test similar to controls (2.31 +/- 0.85, P = 0.96). However, patients with F2-3 fibrosis (1.59 +/- 0.78, P = 0.047) and cirrhotic patients (0.99 +/- 0.33, P = 0.001) had a decreased 13C-caffeine breath test. Fibrosis correlated best with the 13C-caffeine breath test (r(s) = -0.62, P < 0.001). The 13C-caffeine breath test independently predicted significant (F > or = 2) and advanced (F > or = 3) fibrosis and yielded the greatest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.91 +/- 0.04) for predicting advanced fibrosis. The 13C-caffeine breath test was unaltered by 1 week of lamivudine but improved by 61% (P < 0.001) in responders to long-term lamivudine, whereas in those with viraemia and elevated alanine aminotransferase, values remained stable or deteriorated. CONCLUSION: The 13C-caffeine breath test distinguishes chronic hepatitis B virus-related fibrosis and detects improvement in liver function in response to long-term lamivudine.

A randomized comparative study of esomeprazole 40 mg versus pantoprazole 40 mg for healing erosive oesophagitis: the EXPO study.

AIM: To assess the efficacy of the 8-week therapy with esomeprazole 40 mg vs. pantoprazole 40 mg for healing erosive oesophagitis (EE) as part of a management study. METHODS: Patients had a history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms (> or =6 months) and had suffered heartburn on at least 4 of the 7 days preceding enrollment. Endoscopies were performed to grade EE severity using the Los Angeles (LA) classification system at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks (if unhealed at 4 weeks). Heartburn severity was recorded by patients on diary cards. The primary end point was healing of EE by week 8 of treatment. RESULTS: Of 3170 patients randomized, the intent-to-treat population consisted of 3151 patients (63% male, mean age: 50.6 years, 27% Helicobacter pylori-positive). Esomeprazole 40 mg healed a significantly greater proportion of EE patients than pantoprazole 40 mg at both 4 weeks (life table estimates: esomeprazole 81%, pantoprazole 75%, P < 0.001) and 8 weeks (life table estimates: esomeprazole 96%, pantoprazole 92%, P < 0.001). The median time to reach sustained heartburn resolution was 6 days in patients receiving esomeprazole and 8 days with pantoprazole (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Esomeprazole 40 mg is more effective than pantoprazole 40 mg for healing EE and providing resolution of associated heartburn.

Review article: oesophageal complications and consequences of persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

The major oesophageal complications associated with persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) include erosive oesophagitis, ulceration, strictures and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Although the causes of these complications are uncertain, studies indicate that erosive oesophagitis may progress to the development of ulcers, strictures and GI bleeding. Pharmacological treatment with proton pump inhibitors is favoured over that with H(2)-receptor antagonists for the treatment of strictures. The treatment of strictures is accomplished with dilation and many favour the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors. Most gastroenterologists are seeing far fewer oesophageal strictures these days since the introduction of proton pump inhibitors. In addition, research has shown that oesophageal complications have a greater impact on patients suffering from night-time GERD than on those suffering from daytime GERD. Barrett's oesophagus is a significant complication associated with persistent GERD and those at risk generally experience a longer duration of symptoms, especially those with a high degree of severity. In addition, there is a strong relationship between Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. This is in part due to the association of obesity and the development of hiatal hernias. Furthermore, endoscopic screening is being used to detect Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma in persons suffering from chronic GERD, even though screening may not have an impact on outcomes (Sharma P, McQuaid K, Dent J, et al. A critical review of the diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus: The AGA Chicago Workshop. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 310-30.).

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and Helicobacter pylori.

The interaction between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection has been the subject of intense scrutiny in recent years. Although the evidence base is incomplete it is now sufficient to clarify a number of key questions. H. pylori is not a risk factor for reflux disease. Similarly, H. pylori infection, in most patients, is not ''protective'' against the risk of developing reflux and oesophagitis. Furthermore, reflux and oesophagitis are not more likely to develop or to worsen after H. pylori eradication therapy and eradication does not make control of reflux symptoms with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy more difficult. Long term PPI therapy in the presence of H. pylori infection does increase the rate at which gastric mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia develop. Eradication therapy has been shown to reduce this risk. In the uninfected stomach, PPIs are associated with a low likelihood of these adverse histological changes. PPI therapy reduces the accuracy of diagnostic tests for H. pylori. The decision to test for and treat H. pylori infection in the context of reflux must be individualised based on patient factors including co-morbidity, age, gastric histology, family history and informed choice. Distinction must be made between treating symptoms and potentially reducing risks. A decision not to test for and treat H. pylori is now just as active a choice as is the decision to test and treat. Recent international consensus statements recommend eradication of H. pylori prior to long term PPI therapy in reflux disease, although there is not a universal agreement on this. Further research to clarify the risk and benefits of such an approach is required.

Chest pain. Differentiating GIT from cardiac causes.

BACKGROUND: Chest pain is a common presenting symptom in general practice. Although a cardiac cause is not the commonest origin, a high index of suspicion is needed. When the diagnosis is not clear, a cardiac cause should be considered until proven otherwise. A gastrointestinal origin of chest pain is not infrequent and may be due to oesophageal, gastric or biliary disease. Oesophageal causes are most common and include reflux, hypersensitivity or dysmotility. OBJECTIVE: This paper reviews the main gastrointestinal causes that may present with acute chest pain. DISCUSSION: Clinical history taking is the key to decision making and guides the choice of prompt or routine investigation or a therapeutic trial. When reflux is suspected as the cause, a therapeutic trial of high dose antisecretory therapy is appropriate. Investigations may be helpful when typical reflux symptoms are not present or there is a poor response to this approach. Investigations may include endoscopy, ambulatory pH monitoring, barium swallow or oesophageal manometry.

Randomized trial of omeprazole and metronidazole with amoxycillin or clarithromycin for Helicobacter pylori eradication, in a region of high primary metronidazole resistance: the HERO study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of omeprazole-based eradication therapies has been determined mostly in populations with low to moderate prevalence of metronidazole resistant Helicobacter pylori, yet resistance is high in many regions. AIM AND METHODS: The H. pylori eradication and duodenal ulcer healing rates after 1 week of either omeprazole 40 mg mane, amoxycillin 500 mg t.d.s. and metronidazole 400 mg t.d.s. (OAM) or omeprazole 20 mg b.d., metronidazole 400 mg b. d. and clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. (OMC) were compared in a randomized trial in Australia and New Zealand. Patients had a further 1 week of omeprazole 20 mg. Outcome was assessed at 6 weeks with stringent criteria (endoscopy, biopsies and 13C-urea breath test). RESULTS: Of 220 subjects randomized, the H. pylori eradication rates (all patients treated/per protocol) were 82%/85% for OMC and 58%/63% for OAM (P= 0.001). Pre-treatment metronidazole resistance was present in 56% and clarithromycin resistance in 6%. The eradication rate for primary metronidazole resistance isolates treated with OMC was 80% (CI: 65-90%) compared with 45% (CI: 29-62%) for OAM, whereas for sensitive organisms, the eradication rates were 94% (CI: 79-99%) and 79% (CI: 62-91%), respectively. Duodenal ulcer healing was 96% for OMC and 87% for OAM. Compliance was excellent and both treatments were well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: OMC is a well-tolerated, effective therapy for H. pylori eradication and duodenal ulcer healing in this region despite the high metronidazole resistance rate. OAM is less effective, largely due to the impact of metronidazole resistance.