Cediranib and Olaparib Combination Compared With Cediranib or Olaparib Alone, or Chemotherapy in Platinum-Resistant or Primary Platinum-Refractory Ovarian Cancer: NRG-GY005.

PURPOSE: We assessed the efficacy of cediranib, olaparib, and cediranib/olaparib compared with standard-of-care chemotherapy (SOC) in platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory epithelial ovarian cancer (PROC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: NRG-GY005 is an open-label, four-arm, phase II/III superiority trial enrolling patients with high-grade serous/endometrioid PROC and one to three previous therapies. Key exclusion criteria included previous receipt of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor or receipt of antiangiogenic therapy in the recurrent setting. Treatment arms (SOC [once weekly paclitaxel, topotecan, or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin], cediranib, olaparib, or cediranib/olaparib) were equally randomized. A preplanned interim futility analysis on the basis of progression-free survival (PFS) selected treatment arms to advance to phase III. PFS and overall survival (OS) were phase III coprimary end points, with hierarchical testing of PFS followed by OS to preserve type 1 error control, designed to have 90% power for a 0.625 PFS hazard ratio (HR). OS was tested after PFS in the multiple hierarchical testing procedure. Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Five hundred sixty-two eligible patients were enrolled for phase II/III. Three arms met PFS criteria to carry forward to phase III (SOC, cediranib/olaparib, and cediranib). Median PFS was 3.4, 5.2, and 4 months with SOC, cediranib/olaparib, and cediranib, respectively, with a median follow-up duration of 42.2 months. PFS HR estimates for cediranib/olaparib and cediranib (v SOC) were 0.796 (98.3% CI, 0.597 to 1.060) and 0.972 (98.3% CI, 0.726 to 1.300), respectively. Median OS was 13.6, 12.8, and 10.5 months, and of 443 patients with measurable disease, ORR was 8.6%, 24.7%, and 13.1% for SOC, cediranib/olaparib, and cediranib, respectively. No new safety signals were identified. In patients receiving cediranib/olaparib, no statistically significant difference was observed on the NFOSI-DRS-P subscale compared with SOC (98.3% CI, -1.3 to 1.5, P = .8725). CONCLUSION: The cediranib-containing arms demonstrated clinical activity on the basis of PFS but were not superior compared with SOC.

Sociodemographic disparities in targeted therapy in ovarian cancer in a national sample.

Background: The treatment landscape for ovarian cancer has changed in recent years with the introduction of targeted therapies to treat patients with advanced disease. We investigated patient demographic and clinical factors associated with use of targeted therapies as a part of the first-line treatment for ovarian cancer. Methods: This study included patients diagnosed with stage I-IV ovarian cancer between 2012 and 2019 from the National Cancer Database. Information on demographic and clinical characteristics were collected and described using frequency and percent across receipt of targeted therapy. Logistic regression was used to compute the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) associating patient demographic and clinical factors with receipt of targeted therapy. Results: Among 99,286 ovarian cancer patients (mean age 62 years), 4.1% received targeted therapy. The rate of targeted therapy receipt across racial and ethnic groups over the study period was fairly similar; however, non-Hispanic Black women were less likely to receive targeted therapy than their non-Hispanic White counterparts (OR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.76-1.00). Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to receive targeted therapy than those who received adjuvant chemotherapy (OR=1.26; 95% CI: 1.15-1.38). Moreover, among patients who received targeted therapy, 28% received neoadjuvant targeted therapy, with non-Hispanic Black women being most likely to receive neoadjuvant targeted therapy (34%) compared with other racial and ethnic groups. Conclusions: We observed differences in receipt of targeted therapy by factors such as age at diagnosis, stage, and comorbidities present at diagnosis, as well as factors related to healthcare access-including neighborhood education level and health insurance status. Approximately 28% of patients received targeted therapy in the neoadjuvant setting, which could negatively impact treatment outcomes and survival due to the increased risk of complications associated with targeted therapies that may delay or prevent surgery. These results warrant further evaluation in a cohort of patients with more comprehensive treatment information.

Role of neighborhood context in ovarian cancer survival disparities: current research and future directions.

Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer-associated mortality among US women with survival disparities seen across race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, even after accounting for histology, stage, treatment, and other clinical factors. Neighborhood context can play an important role in ovarian cancer survival, and, to the extent to which minority racial and ethnic groups and populations of lower socioeconomic status are more likely to be segregated into neighborhoods with lower quality social, built, and physical environment, these contextual factors may be a critical component of ovarian cancer survival disparities. Understanding factors associated with ovarian cancer outcome disparities will allow clinicians to identify patients at risk for worse outcomes and point to measures, such as social support programs or transportation aid, that can help to ameliorate such disparities. However, research on the impact of neighborhood contextual factors in ovarian cancer survival and in disparities in ovarian cancer survival is limited. This commentary focuses on the following neighborhood contextual domains: structural and institutional context, social context, physical context represented by environmental exposures, built environment, rurality, and healthcare access. The research conducted to date is presented and clinical implications and recommendations for future interventions and studies to address disparities in ovarian cancer outcomes are proposed.

Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Endometrial Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Standard first-line chemotherapy for endometrial cancer is paclitaxel plus carboplatin. The benefit of adding pembrolizumab to chemotherapy remains unclear. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, phase 3 trial, we assigned 816 patients with measurable disease (stage III or IVA) or stage IVB or recurrent endometrial cancer in a 1:1 ratio to receive pembrolizumab or placebo along with combination therapy with paclitaxel plus carboplatin. The administration of pembrolizumab or placebo was planned in 6 cycles every 3 weeks, followed by up to 14 maintenance cycles every 6 weeks. The patients were stratified into two cohorts according to whether they had mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) or mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) disease. Previous adjuvant chemotherapy was permitted if the treatment-free interval was at least 12 months. The primary outcome was progression-free survival in the two cohorts. Interim analyses were scheduled to be triggered after the occurrence of at least 84 events of death or progression in the dMMR cohort and at least 196 events in the pMMR cohort. RESULTS: In the 12-month analysis, Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival in the dMMR cohort were 74% in the pembrolizumab group and 38% in the placebo group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19 to 0.48; P<0.001), a 70% difference in relative risk. In the pMMR cohort, median progression-free survival was 13.1 months with pembrolizumab and 8.7 months with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.71; P<0.001). Adverse events were as expected for pembrolizumab and combination chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, the addition of pembrolizumab to standard chemotherapy resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than with chemotherapy alone. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; NRG-GY018 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03914612.).

A New High Affinity Hemoglobin Variant: Hb San Francisco-KP (HBB: c.104T>C).

The evaluation of erythrocytosis can fail to detect hemoglobin (Hb) variants if a thorough and systemic investigation is not undertaken. Here we report the identification of a novel high-oxygen affinity Hb that was previously misclassified as polycythemia vera (PV). Given that treatment recommendations can vary significantly based on the etiology of erythrocytosis, familiarity with reference laboratories and their methodologies is of crucial importance to conducting a precise consultation, as in the case of our Hb variant, named Hb San Francisco-KP [ß34(B16)Val→Ala, HBB: c.104T>C] for the city and medical center where it was discovered. The Mayo Clinic's (Rochester, MN, USA) Erythrocytosis Evaluation (REVE) panel was instrumental in establishing a final diagnosis. Of note, the patient's clinical response to phlebotomy distinguishes this subtype from many of the other high affinity Hbs where the erythrocytosis is primarily compensatory and not in need of venesection.

Bone metastases in well-to-moderately differentiated neuroendocrine tumors: a single institutional review from the Ohio State University Medical Center.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we look at the clinical features associated with bone metastasis in patients with well-to-moderately differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), specifically primary tumor characteristics, complications, elevated hormone levels, and survival. METHODS: A retrospective study at the Ohio State University was performed on patients diagnosed with well-to-moderately differentiated NETs from 2000 to 2010 who were found to have bone metastases. A control group of patients with metastatic NETs without bone metastases was matched with regard to demographic and clinical data. RESULTS: Of 341 patients with well-to-moderately differentiated NETs, 40 patients were found with bone metastases within the 10-year study period. Patients with bone metastases had shorter survival (median, 52 months) compared to the control group (median, 98 months; P = 0.024). Of 26 patients with bone metastases who died, 6 (23%) patients had a cause of death related to their bone metastatic disease. There were 8 patients with spinal cord compression, and 6 with pathologic fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that patients with well-to-moderately differentiated NETs metastatic to bone have larger tumors, more frequently elevated pancreastatin, and shorter survival than patients without bone metastases, with complications of bone metastases significantly contributing to mortality and morbidity.

Chromosome breakage is regulated by the interaction of the BLM helicase and topoisomerase IIalpha.

Cells deficient in the recQ-like helicase BLM are characterized by chromosome changes that suggest the disruption of normal mechanisms needed to resolve recombination intermediates and to maintain chromosome stability. Human BLM and topoisomerase IIα interact directly via amino acids 489-587 of BLM and colocalize predominantly in late G2 and M phases of the cell cycle. Deletion of this region does not affect the inherent in vitro helicase activity of BLM but inhibits the topoisomerase IIα-dependent enhancement of its activity, based on the analysis of specific DNA substrates that represent some recombination intermediates. Deletion of the interaction domain from BLM fails to correct the elevated chromosome breakage of transfected BLM-deficient cells. Our results demonstrate that the BLM-topoisomerase IIα interaction is important for preventing chromosome breakage and elucidate a DNA repair mechanism that is critical to maintain chromosome stability in cells and to prevent tumor formation.

Telomerase-associated protein 1, HSP90, and topoisomerase IIalpha associate directly with the BLM helicase in immortalized cells using ALT and modulate its helicase activity using telomeric DNA substrates.

The BLM helicase associates with the telomere structural proteins TRF1 and TRF2 in immortalized cells using the alternative lengthening of telomere (ALT) pathways. This work focuses on identifying protein partners of BLM in cells using ALT. Mass spectrometry and immunoprecipitation techniques have identified three proteins that bind directly to BLM and TRF2 in ALT cells: telomerase-associated protein 1 (TEP1), heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), and topoisomerase IIalpha (TOPOIIalpha). BLM predominantly co-localizes with these proteins in foci actively synthesizing DNA during late S and G(2)/M phases of the cell cycle when ALT is thought to occur. Immunoprecipitation studies also indicate that only HSP90 and TOPOIIalpha are components of a specific complex containing BLM, TRF1, and TRF2 but that this complex does not include TEP1. TEP1, TOPOIIalpha, and HSP90 interact directly with BLM in vitro and modulate its helicase activity on telomere-like DNA substrates but not on non-telomeric substrates. Initial studies suggest that knockdown of BLM in ALT cells reduces average telomere length but does not do so in cells using telomerase.