Proctoscopy following transrectal prostate biopsy can control rectal bleeding after prostate biopsy.

OBJECTIVES: Rectal bleeding is a common complication of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRPB). Massive rectal bleeding after TRPB can be life threatening. We initiated proctoscopy after TRPB to clarify the incidence of rectal bleeding and evaluated the usefulness of proctoscopy for controlling bleeding after TRPB. MATERIALS: Two hundred and fifty six patients who underwent TRPB were included in the study. TRPB was performed under local anesthesia. Post-biopsy, we performed a proctoscopy to evaluate the degree of rectal bleeding at four levels (G0, no bleeding; G1, traces; G2, venous bleeding requiring hemostasis; and G3, massive venous bleeding or arterial bleeding). Once the bleeding site on the rectal wall was identified, a gauze tampon was placed at the bleeding site and compressed for a few minutes. A second proctoscopy was performed to confirm complete hemostasis, after which the TRPB was terminated. RESULTS: Proctoscopy revealed that the degree of bleeding was G0 in 27 cases, G1 in 104 cases, G2 in 116 cases, and G3 in nine cases. Rectal bleeding that required hemostasis (G2 and G3) was observed in 125 of 256 cases (48.3%). Among the 125 cases, bleeding was stopped by compression in 121 cases; in the remaining four cases, bleeding continued despite compression and was stopped by suturing of the bleeding site. Suturing was performed by urologists, and none of the 256 patients had problematic posterior hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Proctoscopy enables precise and effective pressure hemostasis. Moreover, suturing hemostasis under direct vision can be performed in cases in which pressure hemostasis is difficult. Continued proctoscopy allays urologists' fear of post-TRPB rectal bleeding.

Prognostic impact of radiological tumor burden in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab.

PURPOSE: Radiological tumor burden has been reported to be prognostic in many malignancies in the immunotherapy era, yet whether it is prognostic in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) treated with pembrolizumab remains uninvestigated. We sought to assess the predictive and prognostic value of radiological tumor burden in patients with mUC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 308 patients with mUC treated with pembrolizumab. Radiological tumor burden was represented by baseline tumor size (BTS) and baseline tumor number (BTN). Optimal cut-off value of BTS was determined as 50 mm using the Youden index (small BTS: n = 194, large BTS: n = 114). Overall (OS), cancer-specific (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) were compared. Non-linear associations between BTS and OS and CSS were evaluated using restricted cubic splines. RESULTS: Patients with large BTS were less likely to have undergone the surgical resection of the primary tumor (P = 0.01), and more likely to have liver metastasis (P < 0.001) and more metastatic lesions (P < 0.001). On multivariable analyses controlling for the effects of confounders (resection of primary tumor, metastatic site, number of metastases and lactate dehydrogenase level), large BTS and high BTN were independently associated with worse OS (HR 1.52; P = 0.015, and HR 1.69; P = 0.018, respectively) and CSS (HR 1.59; P = 0.01, and HR 1.66; P = 0.031, respectively), but not PFS. Restricted cubic splines revealed BTS was correlated with OS and CSS in linear relationships. Additionally, large BTS was significantly predictive of lower ORR and complete response rate on univariable analyses (P = 0.041 and P = 0.032, respectively), but its association disappeared on multivariable analyses. CONCLUSION: Radiological tumor burden has independent prognostic value with a linear relationship in pembrolizumab-treated patients with mUC and might help drive the earlier introduction of second-line pembrolizumab and/or switching to subsequent therapies.

A case of testicular seminoma with testicular abscess caused by Salmonella saintpaul.

Testicular abscesses are rarer than epididymitis and orchitis. Here, we report a case of testicular seminoma with testicular abscess caused by Salmonella saintpaul. A 41-year-old male was referred for painful enlargement of the right scrotal content and fever for 1 week. With the diagnosis of epididymitis, he was administered levofloxacin (LVFX) but the fever and painful enlargement persisted. Because of the poor response to antimicrobial agents and the undeniable complications of testicular malignancy, radical orchiectomy was performed. The testis was enlarged to 7 cm, weighed approximately 100 g, and was filled with pus. A substantial portion of the tumor was seminoma, and pus culture revealed Salmonella saintpaul. Although testicular tumors are the most common differential diseases for testicular abscess, there are few reports of testicular abscess accompanying testicular tumors. Here, we report a case of testicular seminoma with testicular abscess caused by Salmonella saintpaul.