Ventilator-associated pneumonia surveillance using two methods.

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia surveillance is used as a quality indicator due to concerns that some cases may be preventable and may contribute to mortality. Various surveillance criteria exist for the purposes of national reporting, but a large-scale direct comparison has not been conducted. METHODS: A prospective cohort study applied two routinely used surveillance criteria for ventilator-associated pneumonia from the European Centre for Disease Control and the American Centers for Disease Control to all patients admitted to two large general intensive care units. Diagnostic rates and concordance amongst diagnostic events were compared. FINDINGS: A total of 713 at-risk patients were identified during the study period. The European surveillance algorithm returned a rate of 4.6 cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia per 1000 ventilation days (95% confidence interval 3.1-6.6) and the American surveillance system a rate of 5.4 (3.8-7.5). The concordance between diagnostic events was poor (Cohen's Kappa 0.127 (-0.003 to 0.256)). CONCLUSIONS: The algorithms yield similar rates, but the lack of event concordance reveals the absence of inter-algorithm agreement for diagnosing ventilator-associated pneumonia, potentially undermining surveillance as an indicator of care quality.

The effect of a large Legionnaires' disease outbreak in Southwest Edinburgh on acute and critical care services.

OBJECTIVE: The largest outbreak of Legionnaires Disease (LD) in the UK for a decade occurred in Edinburgh in June 2012. We describe the clinical and public health management of the outbreak. SETTING: Three acute hospitals covering an urban area of ~480,000. METHODS: Data were collected on confirmed and suspected cases and minutes of the Incident Management Team meetings were reviewed to identify key actions. RESULTS: Over 1600 urine samples and over 600 sputum samples were tested during the outbreak. 61 patients with pneumonia tested positive for Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 by urinary antigen detection, culture, respiratory PCR or serology. A further 23 patients with pneumonia were treated as suspected cases on clinical and epidemiological grounds but had no microbiological diagnosis. 36% of confirmed and probable cases required critical care admission. Mean ICU length of stay was 11.3 (±7.6) days and mean hospital length of stay for those who were admitted to ICU was 23.0 (±17.2) days. For all hospitalized patients the mean length of stay was 15.7 (±14) days. In total there were four deaths associated with this outbreak giving an overall case fatality of 6.5%. Hospital and critical care mortality was 6.1% and 9.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of patients required prolonged multiple organ support or complex ventilation. Case fatality compared favourably to other recent outbreaks in Europe. Access to rapid diagnostic tests and prompt antibiotic therapy may have mitigated the impact of pre-existing poor health among those affected.

Evaluation of the effect of diagnostic methodology on the reported incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: The optimal method for diagnosing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is controversial and its effect on reported incidence uncertain. This study aimed to model the impact of using either endotracheal aspirate or bronchoalveolar lavage on the reported incidence of pneumonia and then to test effects suggested from theoretical modelling in clinical practice. METHODS: A three-part single-centre study was undertaken. First, diagnostic performance of aspirate and lavage were compared using paired samples from 53 patients with suspected VAP. Secondly, infection surveillance data were used to model the potential effect on pneumonia incidence and antibiotic use of using exclusively aspirate or lavage to investigate suspected pneumonia (643 patients; 110 clinically suspected pneumonia episodes). Thirdly, a practice change initiative was undertaken to increase lavage use; pneumonia incidence and antibiotic use were compared for the 12 months before and after the change. RESULTS: Aspirate overdiagnosed VAP compared with lavage (89% vs 21% of clinically suspected cases, p<0.0001). Modelling suggested that changing from exclusive aspirate to lavage diagnosis would decrease reported pneumonia incidence by 76% (95% CI 67% to 87%) and antibiotic use by 30% (95% CI 20% to 42%). After the practice change initiative, lavage use increased from 37% to 58%. Although clinically suspected pneumonia incidence was unchanged, microbiologically confirmed VAP decreased from 18 to 9 cases per 1000 ventilator days (p = 0.001; relative risk reduction 0.61 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.82)), and mean antibiotic use fell from 9.1 to 7.2 antibiotic days (21% decrease, p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic technique impacts significantly on reported VAP incidence and potentially on antibiotic use.

A unitary patient record improves admission documentation in a medical assessment unit in a major teaching hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the impact of the introduction of a unitary patient record (UPR) on clerking documentation of emergency medical admissions. DESIGN: Retrospective casenote audit. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Random sample of 100 unselected admissions to the medical assessment unit of a major teaching hospital, comprising two groups pre- and post-introduction of the UPR. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements in the documentation of several items were achieved; function before episode, ethnic origin, chest pain, breathlessness, ankle oedema, cough, bowel habit and locomotor symptoms and recording of blood pressure and peripheral pulses. There were trends towards improvement in other areas and there were no areas in which the UPR performed less well than standard documentation. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of the UPR represents the successful application of multidisciplinary principles to over 10,000 acute general medical admissions. It has improved some, but not all, aspects of documentation. Revision of the design of the UPR should lead to further progress, as part of an ongoing process of development and re-audit.